|
Home > Archive > Architecture > October 2006 > Fallacies
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| Warm Worm, if you like talking about fallacies -- like in tomcat's
thread from hell -- you'll love www.fallacyfiles.org
I found this when Googling for "Cum Hoc, Ergo Proctor Hoc" which Jeb
Bartlett said on "West Wing". See, TV can be educational.
| |
| RicodJour 2006-10-31, 5:26 pm |
| Pat wrote:
> Warm Worm, if you like talking about fallacies -- like in tomcat's
> thread from hell -- you'll love www.fallacyfiles.org
>
> I found this when Googling for "Cum Hoc, Ergo Proctor Hoc"
Is that where you have to pawn stuff to afford a hooker or colonoscopy?
R
| |
|
|
RicodJour wrote:
> Pat wrote:
>
> Is that where you have to pawn stuff to afford a hooker or colonoscopy?
>
> R
Finally, someone with a dirtier mind than mine.
No, that is not what "Cum Hoc" means .... you're gross even by MY
standards (I have standards?). It means "With this" or something along
that lines.
"With this, therefore because of this".
| |
| RicodJour 2006-10-31, 5:26 pm |
|
Pat wrote:
> RicodJour wrote:
>
> Finally, someone with a dirtier mind than mine.
>
> No, that is not what "Cum Hoc" means .... you're gross even by MY
> standards (I have standards?). It means "With this" or something along
> that lines.
>
> "With this, therefore because of this".
Dirty?! What do you find dirty about pawn shops, hookers and colons?
If I'd thrown in an albino midget, _that_ would be dirty.
R
|
|
|
|
|