|
Home > Archive > Architecture > November 2006 > Ping: 3D Peruna
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
|
| 3D Peruna 2006-11-25, 9:25 am |
| Michael Bulatovich wrote:
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conte...t/314/5803/1286
>
Thanks for the update... I've seen some other interesting stuff on
Greenland and Antarctica, much of it contradictory.
Monckton wrote a scathing rebuttal to AlGore's rebuttal to Monckton's
Sunday Telegraph articles. He's emailed it to me (and will email it to
anyone who asks). Send me a valid email address (some hows) and I'll
forward it to you. It's 24 pages, in word, with the last 1/3 or so
being scientific references so you can check his
facts/figures/statements for yourself (in other words, he saying that he
didn't take things out of context and you can go check for yourself).
The guys at http://www.climateaudit.org are double checking Monckton
(you can follow here: http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=923).
We just don't know...
| |
| Michael Bulatovich 2006-11-25, 1:25 pm |
| You can go to my site and click the banner...
--
MichaelB
www.michaelbulatovich.ca
"3D Peruna" <wharold@weirdness.com> wrote in message
news:mWY9h.81$ou.79@newsfe06.lga...
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update... I've seen some other interesting stuff on
> Greenland and Antarctica, much of it contradictory.
>
> Monckton wrote a scathing rebuttal to AlGore's rebuttal to Monckton's
> Sunday Telegraph articles. He's emailed it to me (and will email it to
> anyone who asks). Send me a valid email address (some hows) and I'll
> forward it to you. It's 24 pages, in word, with the last 1/3 or so being
> scientific references so you can check his facts/figures/statements for
> yourself (in other words, he saying that he didn't take things out of
> context and you can go check for yourself).
>
> The guys at http://www.climateaudit.org are double checking Monckton (you
> can follow here: http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=923).
>
> We just don't know...
>
>
| |
| RicodJour 2006-11-25, 1:25 pm |
| On Nov 25, 10:10 am, "Michael Bulatovich" <Ple...@dont.try> wrote:
> You can go to my site and click the banner...
Oh, no! Another Ad Sense cult member!! Click the banner is akin to
pull my finger. ;)
R
| |
| 3D Peruna 2006-11-25, 1:25 pm |
| Michael Bulatovich wrote:
> You can go to my site and click the banner...
Check your email...
| |
| Ken S. Tucker 2006-11-26, 3:25 am |
|
3D Peruna wrote:
> Michael Bulatovich wrote:
>
> Thanks for the update... I've seen some other interesting stuff on
> Greenland and Antarctica, much of it contradictory.
>
> Monckton wrote a scathing rebuttal to AlGore's rebuttal to Monckton's
> Sunday Telegraph articles. He's emailed it to me (and will email it to
> anyone who asks). Send me a valid email address (some hows) and I'll
> forward it to you. It's 24 pages, in word, with the last 1/3 or so
> being scientific references so you can check his
> facts/figures/statements for yourself (in other words, he saying that he
> didn't take things out of context and you can go check for yourself).
>
> The guys at http://www.climateaudit.org are double checking Monckton
> (you can follow here: http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=923).
>
> We just don't know...
The story of Greenland is sad = some colonists
settled there in a warm climatic period around
1000AD, and thrived for a few centurys
(that's a long time).
For unknown reasons the climate changed to be
cooler and recent autopsies of the later graves
indicates an unpleasant mortality due to
mal-nutrition and it's side effects, for example
stunted longevity.
For our part, we're attempting a down-sizing to
20x20 as an experiment to comply to the Kyoto
accords, no matter what, we can afford it.
Ken
| |
| 3D Peruna 2006-11-26, 8:25 pm |
| Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> For our part, we're attempting a down-sizing to
> 20x20 as an experiment to comply to the Kyoto
> accords, no matter what, we can afford it.
> Ken
If you just did it because you wanted to, then fine. But don't do it
for "Kyoto." Kyoto, by the authors' own admission, would only affect
temperatures by a fraction of a fraction of a degree...in other words,
it's not about the CO2, but about the carbon credits scheme to enrich a
few at the expense of everyone else.
Kyoto was stupid from the beginning and is even more stupid now.
| |
| Ken S. Tucker 2006-11-27, 3:25 am |
|
3D Peruna wrote:
> Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
>
> If you just did it because you wanted to, then fine. But don't do it
> for "Kyoto." Kyoto, by the authors' own admission, would only affect
> temperatures by a fraction of a fraction of a degree...in other words,
> it's not about the CO2, but about the carbon credits scheme to enrich a
> few at the expense of everyone else.
> Kyoto was stupid from the beginning and is even more stupid now.
Trusted consultants have asked me/us to
consider the issue as well.
Ken
| |
| Warm Worm 2006-11-27, 8:25 pm |
|
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> 3D Peruna wrote:
>
> Trusted consultants have asked me/us to
> consider the issue as well.
> Ken
"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot
With a pink hotel, a boutique, and a swinging hot spot
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got till it's gone
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot
Shoo-bop-bop-bop-bop, shoo-bop-bop-bop
They took all the trees and put 'em in a tree museum
And then they charged all the poeple twenty-five bucks just to see 'em
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got till it's gone
They paved paradise and put up a parking lot
Shoo-bop-bop-bop-bop, shoo-bop-bop-bop..."
-- Joni Mitchell/Amy Grant
|
|
|
|
|