| Author |
about intelligent building
|
|
| architect.kewal@gmail.com 2007-02-21, 3:25 am |
| give me information and standards of intelligent building if any knows
about that
| |
| 3D Peruna 2007-02-21, 3:25 am |
| architect.kewal@gmail.com wrote:
> give me information and standards of intelligent building if any knows
> about that
Go read the alt.architecture FAQ. It was posted a short time ago.
| |
|
| On Feb 20, 11:26 pm, 3D Peruna <whar...@weirdness.com> wrote:
> architect.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Go read the alt.architecture FAQ. It was posted a short time ago.
Isn't an intelligent building one with an IQ over 125?
| |
|
|
<architect.kewal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172029241.137545.176620@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> give me information and standards of intelligent building if any knows
> about that
>
Have you tried to go out on Google and type 'intelligent building standards'
and see what you get back.? Don't pay attention to the others that try to
make jokes of your query. They have a lower IQ anyway.
CID...
| |
|
|
"Pat" <groups@artisticphotography.us> wrote in message
news:1172035077.482916.305640@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 20, 11:26 pm, 3D Peruna <whar...@weirdness.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't an intelligent building one with an IQ over 125?
Buildings have feelings too ya know.
| |
| Michael Bulatovich 2007-02-21, 9:25 am |
|
"Pat" <groups@artisticphotography.us> wrote in message
news:1172035077.482916.305640@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 20, 11:26 pm, 3D Peruna <whar...@weirdness.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't an intelligent building one with an IQ over 125?
Two standard deviations is 130, but you don't always want the smartest
building on the block. They can be awkward, and isolated.
| |
| Michael Bulatovich 2007-02-21, 9:25 am |
|
"Chuck" <chuck_dinsmore@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BLOdnadQBI3jZEbYnZ2dnUVZ_rKvnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> <architect.kewal@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1172029241.137545.176620@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Have you tried to go out on Google and type 'intelligent building
> standards' and see what you get back.? Don't pay attention to the others
> that try to make jokes of your query. They have a lower IQ anyway.
Pay no attention to people who tell you to pay no attention to other people.
| |
| clintonG 2007-02-22, 3:25 am |
| The notion of intelligent building presumes the presence of intelligent
people designing and constructing the building(s).
The National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) has determined that
the U.S. construction industry is operating at a $15 billion loss each and
every year and that number is rising. Does this sound like an industry that
is intelligent?
<%= Clinton Gallagher
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/
MAP http://wikimapia.org/#y=43038073&x=...38&z=17&l=0&m=h
<architect.kewal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172029241.137545.176620@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> give me information and standards of intelligent building if any knows
> about that
>
| |
|
|
"Michael Bulatovich" <Please@dont.try> wrote in message
news:erhf8l0nv6@news4.newsguy.com...
>
> "Chuck" <chuck_dinsmore@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:BLOdnadQBI3jZEbYnZ2dnUVZ_rKvnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> Pay no attention to people who tell you to pay no attention to other
> people. And, pay no attention to those people who tell you to pay no
> attention to people who tell you to pay no attention to other people who
> tell you to pay no attention to other people.
| |
| Michael Bulatovich 2007-02-22, 9:25 am |
|
"Chuck" <chuck_dinsmore@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7M-dnT94Hedl0UDYnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@comcast.com...[color=darkred]
>
> "Michael Bulatovich" <Please@dont.try> wrote in message
> news:erhf8l0nv6@news4.newsguy.com...
You see? IQ is over-rated.
| |
|
|
"Michael Bulatovich" <Please@dont.try> wrote in message
news:erk2ht018rc@news4.newsguy.com...
>
> "Chuck" <chuck_dinsmore@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7M-dnT94Hedl0UDYnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> You see? IQ is over-rated.
Not really, it can go on forever and ever and ever. Since we only use the
newsgroup for fun and flaming and tell folks that they are stupid. They
might really not know things that they question, might be nice to help them
out. If they are playing a game it is easily noticed then one can continue
flaming if one likes.
>
>
| |
| Michael Bulatovich 2007-02-23, 9:25 am |
|
"Chuck" <chuck_dinsmore@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ZmdnWC4lrqnOUPYnZ2dnUVZ_ruknZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Michael Bulatovich" <Please@dont.try> wrote in message
> news:erk2ht018rc@news4.newsguy.com...
>
> Not really, it can go on forever and ever and ever. Since we only use the
> newsgroup for fun and flaming and tell folks that they are stupid. They
> might really not know things that they question, might be nice to help
> them out. If they are playing a game it is easily noticed then one can
> continue flaming if one likes.
It's interesting to look at someone's posting history to get a sense of who
they are. I count 8 from your 'account' here:
1 sending someone to google,
1 saying others on the group have low IQs
this last one,
3 where you misunderstood the question, or post erroneous assertions,
1 where you speculate on the basis of unattributed hearsay,
and 1 where you 'make nice' to Don about the weather....
Now you're getting NG-evangelical on me? ....<plonk>
| |
|
| give me?
That's how you ask for help?
<architect.kewal@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172029241.137545.176620@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> give me information and standards of intelligent building if any knows
> about that
>
|
|
|
|