|
| > =A0Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!
Well, at least the Engineers part makes sense.
> and =A0 1028 =A0other supporters including A/E students
What kind of supporters? Isn't it a lie to include them under that
header? How many of the "others" are A/E students, therefore kind of
relevant and only half a lie?
> have signed the petition demanding of Congress
> a truly independent investigation.
If you want something "truly independent" you don't petition
_Congress_ for it. This says something about the people who signed it.
> Architects, Engineers and all others may sign the petition!
"Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" is a lie. Not even 30%. How
do you expect to be taken seriously?
How do you claim "exponential growth" with only 279 valid signatories?
"But it says right there, everybody is welcome to sign. EVERYBODY is
valid." How do you expect to be taken seriously?
> We will post your name after verifying your A/E credentials --
> and other info for non-A/E's. This may take a few days.
Sweet way to build a mailing list worth more per name than most.
> Mission Statement:
>
> To research and to disseminate the truth
I thought the mission was to demand government do the impossible.
> of the 9/11 "collapses" of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
> to every architect and engineer
Overlooking the poorly constructed sentence I still have to ask why
don't you want to disseminate the truth to people other than A/E
professionals? Don't they deserve the truth? Can they handle the
truth? Why are A/E professionals somehow special, more deserving of
the truth?
> Why are Architects and Engineers Re-examining the WTC Collapses?
I thought they weren't and Congress was supposed to. Independently.
Well, maybe A/Es are doing it. But then why would you need to demand
of Congress that A/Es do it. All Congress could do would be to pass a
law that says "Um, well, there you go. Um."
> Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function
> well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-
> rise buildings at the World Trade Center which "collapsed" on 9/11
> (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of
> evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the
> scope of our training and experience.
I know what you are trying to say, but you did not succede.
Isn't controlled demolition clearly inside the scope of "our" training
and experience?
> attacks and staggering loss of life has limited our ability to
> rationally evaluate what really happened.
Well then, maybe Congress is the correct body after all. I mean, who
else could be an independent government body specializing in
irrationality?
You want to evaluate what really happened or discover what really
happened?
Or have you actually done both to your own (all be it irrational)
satisfaction?
> [deleted due to lack of support]
> read more...
Can't. You lose.
|
|