Home > Archive > Lawn and Garden forum > June 2005 > Gears or Hydrostat ?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Gears or Hydrostat ?
Iowa883

2005-06-24, 11:26 pm

I was wonderng what you all thought about a riding mower with gears versus
hydrostats ? Is there any advantage to the old fashion gears ? I am looking
at the maint. aspect .
Plus and minus of each would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Iowa883


puddles

2005-06-24, 11:26 pm


"Iowa883" <dswebber@netins.net> wrote in message
news:d9hvf4$qr8$1@news.netins.net...
quote:

> I was wondering what you all thought about a riding mower with gears

versus
quote:

> hydrostats ? Is there any advantage to the old fashion gears ? I am

looking
quote:

> at the maintenance. aspect .
> Plus and minus of each would be appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Iowa883


Gears really limit your ability to vary your speed. To speed up and slow
down you've got to CONSTANTLY work the throttle. Lots of wear on the motor
and drive train.

Variable drive allows a single lever to control your speed WITHOUT altering
the motor RPM. The governor runs the motor at one speed REGARDLESS of load.
Minimal wear on the motor and drive train.

Puddles




Srgnt Billko

2005-06-24, 11:26 pm


"puddles" <puddles@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:11bp6pfeegmm6a@corp.supernews.com...
quote:

>
> "Iowa883" <dswebber@netins.net> wrote in message
> news:d9hvf4$qr8$1@news.netins.net...
> versus
> looking
>
> Gears really limit your ability to vary your speed. To speed up and slow
> down you've got to CONSTANTLY work the throttle. Lots of wear on the motor
> and drive train.
>
> Variable drive allows a single lever to control your speed WITHOUT

altering
quote:

> the motor RPM. The governor runs the motor at one speed REGARDLESS of

load.
quote:

> Minimal wear on the motor and drive train.
>
> Puddles
>


<chuckle>


ds549@webtv.net

2005-06-24, 11:26 pm

the hydros in the cheeper tractors have been very problematic,. in
that respect gears would be better.but the hydro is easier to operate.
lucas

willshak

2005-06-25, 12:25 pm

On 6/24/2005 9:19 PM US(ET), ds549@webtv.net took fingers to keys, and
typed the following:
quote:

> the hydros in the cheeper tractors have been very problematic,. in
>that respect gears would be better.but the hydro is easier to operate.
>lucas
>


I haven't had any problems with the hydro in my Murray built garden
tractor and it has been in use for 10 years in all seasons, mowing and
blowing, here in the NE USA.

--
Bill
Stanley

2005-06-26, 11:26 pm

Had the 6 gears, got a new hydro..Just Luv it...Keep your hand on the
shifter, no throttle nor brake neeed..Speed up anytine without stopping to
change gears

Just LUV it!


"Iowa883" <dswebber@netins.net> wrote in message
news:d9hvf4$qr8$1@news.netins.net...
quote:

>I was wonderng what you all thought about a riding mower with gears versus
>hydrostats ? Is there any advantage to the old fashion gears ? I am looking
>at the maint. aspect .
> Plus and minus of each would be appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Iowa883
>
>



LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com