|
Home > Archive > Tools repair and advice > June 2005 > GE Going Downhill
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| I hear you about that. Typical plantation-minded company best I can tell.
One good thing about them.... they bought one of our major competitors a
couple of years ago. Now our company spends over half the time fixing their
products in the field and the other time replacing them!!
"none" <Vampyres@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:1q9et09gfo9gn87t0bnrkd3cdmon9p06r5@4ax.com...
quote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:03:18 GMT, "Fred"
> <testing@testing1212mouse.com> wrote:
>
"meatball".[vbcol=seagreen]
on[vbcol=seagreen]
the[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Fred, I grew up way back when in a home that had to deal with GE and
> all the crap they dish out.
> My old man was an electrical engineer working in one of their
> industrial divisions servicing motors and generators.
> I still hate GE with my heart and soul to this very day.
> It wasn't untill my old man tried to got the union in that he got a
> decent wage.
> It took over a year with GE pulling every criminal, dirty trick it
> could to bust our efforts.
> They even hired teamsters to come in and terrorize the families.
> I took more than a few licks on that one, not to mention me and my
> father having our cars bashed up on several occasions.
> I wouldn't pollute my piss on a GE product.
the[vbcol=seagreen]
GE[vbcol=seagreen]
>
| |
| James Sweet 2005-06-17, 11:33 pm |
|
"Fred" <testing@testing1212mouse.com> wrote in message
news:wEIBd.22082$rL3.13022@trnddc03...
quote:
> I hear you about that. Typical plantation-minded company best I can tell.
>
> One good thing about them.... they bought one of our major competitors a
> couple of years ago. Now our company spends over half the time fixing
their
quote:
> products in the field and the other time replacing them!!
GE used to make really top notch stuff, sometime back in the 70's though
they started getting cheaper and at some point they passed a point of no
return. Today for the most part, GE is junk, the once renowned name is
forever tarnished.
| |
|
|
"James Sweet" <jamessweet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LYIBd.20971$2X6.11679@trnddc07...
| GE used to make really top notch stuff, sometime back in the 70's though
| they started getting cheaper and at some point they passed a point of no
| return. Today for the most part, GE is junk, the once renowned name is
| forever tarnished.
A lot of these old line names seem to be rented out to 'improve' crap these
days! You can usually tell when you see them used on some totally 'wrong'
product. "Bell and Howell Triple Head Shaver - As Seen On TV" comes to mind.
Bell and Howell Shavers??? What happened to their projectors?
N
| |
| c.reifert 2005-06-17, 11:33 pm |
|
"NSM" <nowrite@to.me> wrote in message
news:EhLBd.43478$KO5.35687@clgrps13...
quote:
>
> "James Sweet" <jamessweet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:LYIBd.20971$2X6.11679@trnddc07...
>
> | GE used to make really top notch stuff, sometime back in the 70's though
> | they started getting cheaper and at some point they passed a point of no
> | return. Today for the most part, GE is junk, the once renowned name is
> | forever tarnished.
>
> A lot of these old line names seem to be rented out to 'improve' crap
these
quote:
> days! You can usually tell when you see them used on some totally 'wrong'
> product. "Bell and Howell Triple Head Shaver - As Seen On TV" comes to
mind.
quote:
> Bell and Howell Shavers??? What happened to their projectors?
>
> N
>
Bell and Howell is the brand of parts systems that I repair in car
dealerships. Same logo, so I know it's the same group. That scares me!!
Will
| |
|
| James Sweet wrote:
quote:
> GE used to make really top notch stuff, sometime back in the 70's though
> they started getting cheaper and at some point they passed a point of no
> return. Today for the most part, GE is junk, the once renowned name is
> forever tarnished.
Back in the '60s (and possibly earlier) GE was a innovator in production
shortcuts. Since they also developed and manufactured electron tubes
and plastics, they took advantage of it in their consumer product
development. Their TVs were the first with polarized power cords,
presumably to assure acceptable performance.
| |
| GEO Me@home.here 2005-06-17, 11:33 pm |
| On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 02:25:47 GMT, "James Sweet"
<jamessweet@hotmail.com> wrote:
quote:
>"Fred" wrote in message
>news:wEIBd.22082$rL3.13022@trnddc03...
[vbcol=seagreen]
>GE used to make really top notch stuff, sometime back in the 70's though
>they started getting cheaper and at some point they passed a point of no
>return. Today for the most part, GE is junk, the once renowned name is
>forever tarnished.
From chapter 5 of 'Perfectly Legal' by David Cay Johnston:
'Jack Welch left GE in September 2001 after 41 years. His final
salary and bonus totaled $16.7 million. He also left with stock
options worth a quarter of a billion dollars and a pension that
shareholders were told was worth more than $9 million a year.'
This did not include the perks that were paid by GE, including a
Boing 737 for his personal use (page 61).
I guess that GE was doing fine for some.
Geo
| |
| Mad Mac 2005-06-17, 11:33 pm |
| c.reifert wrote:
quote:
> Bell and Howell is the brand of parts systems that I repair in car
> dealerships. Same logo, so I know it's the same group. That scares me!!
>
> Will
>
B&H were also in the military manufacturing business (Radar/Periscopes
etc.)!
| |
|
|
"GEO" <Me@home.here> wrote in message
news:41d793a7.118088@news.ucalgary.ca...
| From chapter 5 of 'Perfectly Legal' by David Cay Johnston:
|
| 'Jack Welch left GE in September 2001 after 41 years. His final
| salary and bonus totaled $16.7 million. He also left with stock
| options worth a quarter of a billion dollars and a pension that
| shareholders were told was worth more than $9 million a year.'
|
| This did not include the perks that were paid by GE, including a
| Boing 737 for his personal use (page 61).
|
| I guess that GE was doing fine for some.
|
| Geo
See "America: What Went Wrong?" by James B Steele, Donald L. Barlett
Reader's quote ===>> "America: What Went Wrong" is just as important and
relevant today as it was when initially released. America's overall economic
situation is much worse today than it was when this book was initially
published. This book accurately forecasts the problems America has as it
loses its manufacturing base and became a service-oriented society (Wal-Mart
supposedly has 700 Chinese factories of its own). Now the multi-national's
factories are fleeing Mexico in 2002 for the slave-like workers of China.
Unsettling for sure, I challenge you to read this book and don't be
surprised if you re-read parts of it as the late 1990s Clinton/Greenspan
artificial economic bubble unwinds into a 1930s style worldwide economic
depression.
GW
| |
|
| On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:33:38 -0800, Mad Mac <madmacmfc@adelphia.net>
wrote:
quote:
>c.reifert wrote:
>
>B&H were also in the military manufacturing business (Radar/Periscopes
>etc.)!
Bell and Howell were into just about all types of manufacturing years
ago.
Especially the photographic industry.
Gunsight cameras, belly cameras etc...
Then there's all the actual general photgraphic cameras from still to
mopic.( in the 60's they marketed the most popular work horse 35mm
around under the pentax label. Spotmatic was it's name.)
Then of course there's all the WWII era cameras they made for th
military which were used right up to the late 70's.( their 16mm combat
movie cameras the KM, KLM, KRM 70 series. I used them during my combat
camera days.)
They also made slide strip projectors as well as movie film
projectors.
They started out as principally a grinder of optical lenses and grew
from there.
| |
|
| On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:25:30 GMT, "GEO" Me@home.here wrote:
quote:
>On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 02:25:47 GMT, "James Sweet"
><jamessweet@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> From chapter 5 of 'Perfectly Legal' by David Cay Johnston:
>
> 'Jack Welch left GE in September 2001 after 41 years. His final
>salary and bonus totaled $16.7 million. He also left with stock
>options worth a quarter of a billion dollars and a pension that
>shareholders were told was worth more than $9 million a year.'
>
> This did not include the perks that were paid by GE, including a
>Boing 737 for his personal use (page 61).
>
> I guess that GE was doing fine for some.
>
> Geo
Yet when I worked for them as an electrician's assistant they often
tried to cheat me out of my pay.(late paychecks, short paychecks
etc...)
| |
| GEO Me@home.here 2005-06-17, 11:33 pm |
| On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:17:23 GMT, "NSM" <nowrite@to.me> wrote:
quote:
>
>"GEO" :
>| From chapter 5 of 'Perfectly Legal' by David Cay Johnston:
>| 'Jack Welch left GE in September 2001 after 41 years. His final
>| salary and bonus totaled $16.7 million. He also left with stock
>| options worth a quarter of a billion dollars and a pension that
>| shareholders were told was worth more than $9 million a year.'
>| This did not include the perks that were paid by GE, including a
>| Boing 737 for his personal use (page 61).
>|
>| I guess that GE was doing fine for some.
quote:
>See "America: What Went Wrong?" by James B Steele, Donald L. Barlett
>
>Reader's quote ===>> "America: What Went Wrong" is just as important and
>relevant today as it was when initially released. America's overall economic
>situation is much worse today than it was when this book was initially
>published. This book accurately forecasts the problems America has as it
>loses its manufacturing base and became a service-oriented society (Wal-Mart
>supposedly has 700 Chinese factories of its own). Now the multi-national's
>factories are fleeing Mexico in 2002 for the slave-like workers of China.
>Unsettling for sure, I challenge you to read this book and don't be
>surprised if you re-read parts of it as the late 1990s Clinton/Greenspan
>artificial economic bubble unwinds into a 1930s style worldwide economic
>depression.
Thanks for the reference. I'll check if my local library has it.
Geo
| |
| David Combs 2005-06-17, 11:33 pm |
| In article <7eNBd.43756$KO5.23326@clgrps13>, NSM <nowrite@to.me> wrote:
quote:
>
>
>See "America: What Went Wrong?" by James B Steele, Donald L. Barlett
>
>Reader's quote ===>> "America: What Went Wrong" is just as important and
>relevant today as it was when initially released. America's overall economic
>situation is much worse today than it was when this book was initially
>published. This book accurately forecasts the problems America has as it
>loses its manufacturing base and became a service-oriented society (Wal-Mart
>supposedly has 700 Chinese factories of its own). Now the multi-national's
>factories are fleeing Mexico in 2002 for the slave-like workers of China.
>Unsettling for sure, I challenge you to read this book and don't be
>surprised if you re-read parts of it as the late 1990s Clinton/Greenspan
>artificial economic bubble unwinds into a 1930s style worldwide economic
>depression.
>
>GW
Some patriots, these CEOs! Sell the nation down the
tubes just to raise EPS.
Lenin is supposed to have said something like this:
Don't worry about the capitalists; they'll
sell us the rope to hang them with.
:-(
David
| |
|
| "none" <Vampyres@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
news:kllft0h8mjogq9v838j8q2hffphlu0rk9p@4ax.com...
quote:
> On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:33:38 -0800, Mad Mac <madmacmfc@adelphia.net>
> wrote:
>
me!![vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Bell and Howell were into just about all types of manufacturing years
> ago.
> Especially the photographic industry.
> Gunsight cameras, belly cameras etc...
> Then there's all the actual general photgraphic cameras from still to
> mopic.( in the 60's they marketed the most popular work horse 35mm
> around under the pentax label. Spotmatic was it's name.)
> Then of course there's all the WWII era cameras they made for th
> military which were used right up to the late 70's.( their 16mm combat
> movie cameras the KM, KLM, KRM 70 series. I used them during my combat
> camera days.)
> They also made slide strip projectors as well as movie film
> projectors.
> They started out as principally a grinder of optical lenses and grew
> from there.
Sounds like a familiar story - a company makes a name for itself in one
area, then establishes a good distribution network. Then some wall street
gobbler buys it for it's distribution network and used it to sell cheap junk
and trinkets. Then they unload the shell of the company after they have
sucked all the value out of it and run off their senior tech staff.
|
|
|
|
|