|
Home > Archive > Home Repair forum > February 2008 > Re: John McCain, liar and liberal punk
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: John McCain, liar and liberal punk
|
|
| symplastless 2008-02-01, 9:25 pm |
| I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John McCain is
one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What is the
matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of people logging and
people opposed to logging federal public land. When I say logging I want to
be absolutely care what I mean:
I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100% at
www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess you are
write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean water for our
children and grand children.
He did seem interested in the forest health issues.
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
<haber14@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:0ae828e7-0632-49bb-a86d-afe686fea152@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 31, 3:32 am, Ted <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Open-Borders Activist Juan Hernandez Works for McCain Campaign
> MOONBATTERY.COM
> Jan. 25, 2008
>
> To get an idea of just how contemptuously John McCain is lying through
> his teeth when he claims to have learned his lesson from the shamnesty
> debacle, Michelle Malkin reports that Juan Hernandez, whom she
> accurately describes as an "ethnocentrist, border obliteration
> activist," is working as McLame's Hispanic Outreach Director.
>
> This would clearly indicate that the outreach is not to Hispanic
> Americans, but to Mexicans who are colonizing this country illegally.
>
> You've probably seen Hernandez on cable TV, smarmily calling everyone
> "my friend" as he demands that the USA renounce any claims to
> territorial sovereignty. He has headed up Mexico's Office of Mexicans
> Abroad. That is, he's served as an agent of a foreign power whose
> interests are clearly hostile to our own regarding the unacceptable
> border situation. working for a free flow of people.
>
> In other words, America must submit to unlimited Mexican colonization,
> as well as provide healthcare and social services for any Mexican who
> cares to take a ride north. Among his causes: defending Mexican bus
> drivers for bringing illegal aliens to the USA.
>
> Mexicans in America are still Mexicans in Hernandez's scheme of
> things: "I want 'em all to think Mexico first" -- no matter how many
> generations they have spent in the USA. Assimilation is clearly not on
> his agenda, any more than border security is on McCain's.
Dennis
http://www.vdare.com/ V-Dare
| |
| symplastless 2008-02-02, 3:25 am |
| many people would like to drink clean water and breath clean air if they
have the opportunity or choice
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
"symplastless" <symplastless@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:qcWdnW3Eu5X3RT7anZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John McCain is
>one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What is the
>matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of people logging and
>people opposed to logging federal public land. When I say logging I want
>to be absolutely care what I mean:
>
> I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100% at
> www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess you are
> write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean water for
> our children and grand children.
>
> He did seem interested in the forest health issues.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> John A. Keslick, Jr.
> Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
> http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
> and www.treedictionary.com
> Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
> Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding
> us that we are not the boss.
>
>
>
>
> <haber14@lycos.com> wrote in message
> news:0ae828e7-0632-49bb-a86d-afe686fea152@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 31, 3:32 am, Ted <tedor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dennis
>
> http://www.vdare.com/ V-Dare
>
>
| |
| HeyBub 2008-02-02, 3:25 am |
| symplastless wrote:
> I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John
> McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
> is the matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of
> people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
> say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:
>
> I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
> at www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess
> you are write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean
> water for our children and grand children.
>
> He did seem interested in the forest health issues.
Tree hugger!
Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.
| |
| Tony Hwang 2008-02-02, 3:25 am |
| HeyBub wrote:
> symplastless wrote:
>
>
>
> Tree hugger!
>
> Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
> need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.
>
>
Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"
| |
| HeyBub 2008-02-02, 1:25 pm |
| Tony Hwang wrote:
> Hmm,
> Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
> plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
> If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
> time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"
With enough coal-fired power plants, we can distill unlimited amounts of
water and generate Oxygen by electrolysis.
I don't see a problem.
| |
| symplastless 2008-02-02, 5:26 pm |
|
"HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:13q7oqapbmdgo35@corp.supernews.com...
> symplastless wrote:
>
> Tree hugger!
>
> Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll
> ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.
>
Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree biology.
If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
| |
| symplastless 2008-02-02, 5:26 pm |
|
"HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:13q9cotaur3i1f0@corp.supernews.com...
> Tony Hwang wrote:
>
> With enough coal-fired power plants, we can distill unlimited amounts of
> water and generate Oxygen by electrolysis.
>
> I don't see a problem.
What about soil?
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
| |
| aemeijers 2008-02-02, 5:26 pm |
| symplastless wrote:
> "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:13q7oqapbmdgo35@corp.supernews.com...
snip[color=darkred]
>
> Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree biology.
> If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
> No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
> http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html
>
>
I'm no tree expert, but I like most trees better than I like most people.
aem sends....
| |
| symplastless 2008-02-02, 5:26 pm |
|
"aemeijers" <aemeijers@att.net> wrote in message
news:Sg6pj.536450$kj1.228083@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> symplastless wrote:
> snip
>
> I'm no tree expert, but I like most trees better than I like most people.
>
> aem sends....
What's you favorite tree?
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
| |
| aemeijers 2008-02-02, 8:26 pm |
| symplastless wrote:
> "aemeijers" <aemeijers@att.net> wrote in message
> news:Sg6pj.536450$kj1.228083@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> What's you favorite tree?
>
>
I don't even know how to answer that. I'm not fussy on species, as long
as they are healthy. I get a little PO'd at the branches that the 60+
foot maple in my back yard keeps dropping- one of these days, one of
them is bound to hit the house. I was utterly blown away driving
through a patch of sequoia on the road up to that famous mountain near
Portland Oregon- I'd love to have a chance to visit there in warmer
weather some time, instead of a lightning side trip for dinner while on
a business trip. But I find hanging out in a tall-canopy forest for an
hour, is good for a least a 20-point drop in BP for the rest of the day,
as long as nothing sets off my allergies, and none of the fauna dines on me.
The 100+ year old building I work in used to have dozens of mature
deciduous trees around it, that provided lots of shade to sit, and park
under. Building management has found excuses to remove most of them, and
replace a few with small evergreens that will never get over 20 feet.
Better than nothing, I guess, but a little boring. IMHO, the desire to
simplfy mowing and avoid raking should not be the criteria for choosing
trees. That, and they (from casual non-expert inspection) all seem to be
the same species. If a bug ever comes around, it'll be looking pretty
brown around there.
aem sends...
| |
| Kurt Ullman 2008-02-02, 8:26 pm |
| In article <g7-dnRRqF-29aDnanZ2dnUVZ_t6onZ2d@comcast.com>,
"symplastless" <symplastless@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> What's you favorite tree?
<Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference>
The Larch
</Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference>
| |
| symplastless 2008-02-02, 8:26 pm |
|
"aemeijers" <aemeijers@att.net> wrote in message
news:r_6pj.192112$MJ6.86917@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> symplastless wrote:
> I don't even know how to answer that. I'm not fussy on species, as long as
> they are healthy.
I like forest where all of the ecological stages of trees are of value.
Each ecological stage is associated with unique groups of organisms and
microorganisms.
Check out the first two articles at this site:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT2...oget/index.html
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
| |
| symplastless 2008-02-02, 8:26 pm |
|
"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-D0C383.19564402022008@70-3-168-216.area5.spcsdns.net...
> In article <g7-dnRRqF-29aDnanZ2dnUVZ_t6onZ2d@comcast.com>,
> "symplastless" <symplastless@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> <Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference>
>
> The Larch
>
> </Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference>
Unique tree. A deciduous conifer. Other than ginkgo that's the only
deciduous conifer I know of.
Of course most conifers do shed their foliage, just not all at once.
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|