quote:

---

>
> You're asking for something that doesn't exist. It takes quite some
> time to learn the "basics" and then it takes some time to learn the
> software.
>
> Are you looking to create "pretty pictures" or "building information
> models?" They're related, but very different in how they're
> approached. And for either of them, you're looking at investing
> considerable time and money. The decent software starts at about $1K
> (and I don't think that stuff is all that good -- to get anything
> worthwhile for 3D work, look to spend at least $3K). And the learning
> curve is steep--because you're not only learning the software, but how
> to represent a building.
>
> Lastly...as for "best" software. You're asking for a religious
> discussion. There are many programs out there. Those who use them all
> have their reasons for doing so and think that their software is the
> best for their purposes. The industry standard is based on Autodesk's
> AutoCAD products...but that doesn't mean they're the best, or what you
> should use (because you don't have a clue as to what you're getting into).
>
> Why not just hire an architecture firm to do what you need to do?