|
Home > Archive > Alternative Power sources > October 2005 > Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Foucault Pendulum and 'free energy'.
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Conservation of angular momentum, Foucault Pendulum and 'free energy'.
|
|
|
| "malc" <malcolm.white@ubht.swest.nhs.uk> wrote in message
news:1128954618.409774.215740@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> News wrote:
the[color=darkred]
make[color=darkred]
Institution[color=darkred]
that[color=darkred]
claiming it[color=darkred]
science[color=darkred]
Institution[color=darkred]
>
> I saw those lectures on TV. I never could figure out why he was not
> made a member of the RI.
I saw them too. He dared to say that "maybe" the laws of physics could not
explain what was happening. Anyone who thinks the laws of physics
encapsulates all understanding of matter is a fool.
He patented the reactionless drive in 1994 and was working for NASA at his
death 1997. He was constantly on the radio - the BBC World Service' Science
in Action. I would listen to him from the middle of a desert, and Imoperial
College. He went to great lengths, probably frigging figures and the likes,
to prove that the recationless drive was inside the current laws, otherwise
no one would take it seriously. Where is this openness to the off the wall,
from a new angle thinking the British are so famous for? Karl Marx was
basically driven out of his own country, yet the British allowed him to
study and live in then UK, as he was a deep, different and free thinker.
Marx wrote Das Capital in the reading room of the British Museum.
The Royal Society owe Eric Laithwaites family an apology. And if this is
how they conduct themselves then the outfit should wound up.
|
|
|
|
|