Home > Archive > Alternative Power sources > December 2005 > Re: ?MTBF - Big and Heavy versus Modern and light ...?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: ?MTBF - Big and Heavy versus Modern and light ...?
philkryder

2005-12-31, 10:21 pm


Bughunter wrote:[color=darkred]
> One said, built in 1943, 43000 hours, and still flying! Amazing!
>
> How do you spell "overbuilt" and "rugged dependability".
>
> Maybe we should teach engineers how to use slide-rules again?
>
> And how about those B52's. The expect that they may still be using the
> original airframes
> after 100 years of service.
>
>
> "Anthony Matonak" <anthonym40@nothing.like.comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:6NadndKuj_YUhirenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...

I assume the 43000 hours is airframe hours.
How many hours between overhauls on those engines?
Does the FAA require rebuild and recertification based on hours?

LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2009 homeownerschat.com