|
Home > Archive > Alternative Power sources > July 2005 > Workshop In An Alternate Homepower Environment
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Workshop In An Alternate Homepower Environment
|
|
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully get a
good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if this offends
anyone.
When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
homepower environment where every amp is precious?
Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is off
grid?
Special operations like welding and using air compressors would seem to
need consideration because of their unique requirements.
I would be interested in hearing how others have approached this
situation and what implementations they have adopted.
Thanks for any suggestions or comments that you can offer.
TMT
| |
| Robert Bonomi 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| In article <1118776073.386508.60230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Tools <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
quote:
>I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully get a
>good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if this offends
>anyone.
>
>When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
>what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
>homepower environment where every amp is precious?
>
>Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
>
>Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
cordless tools violate the 'every amp is precious' premise.
Charging batteries is *extremely* ineffcient.
quote:
>When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
>grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is off
>grid?
PTO-driven ones. The 'drive' can come from nerly anything -- a water-wheel,
a steam-engine, a tread-mill, etc. Even an electric motor, in extreme
circumstance. 
quote:
>Special operations like welding and using air compressors would seem to
>need consideration because of their unique requirements.
Welding -- gas, instead of electric arc.
Air compressor -- gasoline/deiesel engint, steam-powered.
| |
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| Good point on the battery charging of cordless tools.
I was thinking that they might fit in where they could be run from the
main bank of batteries themselves.
TMT
| |
| MikeMandaville 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| I second what Robert Bonomi has said. What's wrong with good old
fashioned human power? Such machinery was once very common. Take a
look at some pictures of old machinery, and you will find an apprentice
who is busy turning a flywheel all day long, and observing his master
at work, thereby gaining a firsthand knoiwledge which no number of
words can communicate. Nowadays, however, such flywheel turners tend
to be very expensive. Therefore, I recommend that you build yourself a
squirrelcage apparatus, and purchase a greyhound to run in it. Retired
racing greyhounds are put to death if nobody wants them. I know a lady
who has a retired racer, and he is a wonderful pet. A racer is happy
when he is racing. This is of the very nature of a racer. So give a
veteran a job, for god's sake, and build a squirrelcage power plant.
Mike Mandaville
providing meaningful solutions for the workaday world
| |
| Ignoramus32489 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| On 14 Jun 2005 12:36:13 -0700, MikeMandaville <MikeMandaville@aol.com> wrote:
quote:
> I second what Robert Bonomi has said. What's wrong with good old
> fashioned human power? Such machinery was once very common. Take a
> look at some pictures of old machinery, and you will find an apprentice
> who is busy turning a flywheel all day long, and observing his master
> at work, thereby gaining a firsthand knoiwledge which no number of
> words can communicate. Nowadays, however, such flywheel turners tend
> to be very expensive. Therefore, I recommend that you build yourself a
> squirrelcage apparatus, and purchase a greyhound to run in it. Retired
> racing greyhounds are put to death if nobody wants them. I know a lady
> who has a retired racer, and he is a wonderful pet. A racer is happy
> when he is racing. This is of the very nature of a racer. So give a
> veteran a job, for god's sake, and build a squirrelcage power plant.
Along the same lines, I would suggest to build an internal combustion
engine powered by the the farting gas. You need to assure a steady
supply of beans and cabbage if you want this to work well. You will
need a flexible vinyl line for supplying gas to the engine, if you
want to move about the shope while the engine is running.
i
quote:
> Mike Mandaville
> providing meaningful solutions for the workaday world
>
--
| |
| FriscoSoxFan 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| 1. Go to a big power tool store.
2. Buy a generator.
3. Buy a whole bunch of gas.
4. Start said generator
5. Plug in tools
6. Build.
| |
| MikeMandaville 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| And for those who might think that fart gas, otherwise known as bio
gas, is unrealistic, here is the Mother Earth News "Plowboy Interview"
of L. John Fry, who powered his farm with a generator turned by an
engine which ran on this gas. This engine ran non-stop for six solid
years:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel...s/fryintvu.html
| |
|
|
Only real solution for running tools at home is a generator. A propane
generator might be the way to go if you already have auxilary heat that
way. Typically the machines don't run terribly long at a stretch,
except maybe a sander. My jointer and table saw only run a few minutes
max.
If your pace is slow, hand tools will get it all done. Watched alone
in the wilderness the other night. He did amazing time with cutting
through several feet of spruce tree with a large western hand saw.
Alan
| |
| samuelchamb 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| Too_Many_Tools wrote:
quote:
> I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully get a
> good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if this offends
> anyone.
>
> When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
> what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
> homepower environment where every amp is precious?
>
> Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
>
> Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
>
> When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
> grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is off
> grid?
>
> Special operations like welding and using air compressors would seem to
> need consideration because of their unique requirements.
>
> I would be interested in hearing how others have approached this
> situation and what implementations they have adopted.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions or comments that you can offer.
>
> TMT
>
ok things that you need a genny/huge inverter for (1) air compressor
1.1kw + , (2) arc/mig,tig welder 2.2kw + , some large routers and table
saws . the list is endless . I at presant can run my 12speed pillar
drill or chop saw (not both) from my 1 kw mod inverter . high batt
voltage will help you start large motors so use in day light hours only
(solar)
| |
|
| On 14 Jun 2005 12:07:53 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
quote:
>When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
>what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
>homepower environment where every amp is precious?
8kW (surges to 16) can handle most everything a home shop is likely to
have. We have a few limitations - Hypertherm 600 suffers nuisance
cut-outs above 45 Amps. It will also temporarily shut down if the
compressor starts mid-cut. So I let the compressor tank fill, then
shut the pump power off before starting the cut. For prolonged cutting
at max output, I run the backup generator for boost. Lincoln SW TIG
175 can't be run at full output off our inverters, amp draw is too
high. Could be solved by trading up to an inverter based unit if I
didn't already have an engine driven substitute for the bigger jobs.
Powermig 255 seems perfectly happy at full output.
quote:
>Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
Yuck! Perish the thought.
quote:
>Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
Cordless tools are great for jobs where the cord is a nuisance, but
there' isn't any special need for them with home power. Careful though
if you're using some of the modsquare (often called modsine)
inverters, they can cook the chargers included with some cordless
tools.
quote:
>When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
>grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is off
>grid?
There aren't really any special considerations unless you're trying to
get away with too-small inverter capacity. Keep in mind that if you're
maxing out system capacity in the shop, it won't be available in the
house at the same time. Having said that, I don't bother to tell my
wife what I'm up to in the shop. If together we managed to exceed
capacity, the inverters would trip off automatically. And that could
happen more easily if for instance batteries were low, and you have
surges due to large loads starting. The temporary voltage drop might
be sensed, and cause a shutdown.
quote:
>Special operations like welding and using air compressors would seem to
>need consideration because of their unique requirements.
One thing I've done with all equipment purchases is to make sure
they're easily returnable just in case they're not compatible with the
inverters. VFDs could be an issue for instance. Although the only
thing we've ever returned due to incompatibility was a bread maker
that ran at double speed.
Wayne
| |
|
| On 14 Jun 2005 12:55:15 -0700, "FriscoSoxFan" <junk@kreusch.com>
wrote:
quote:
>1. Go to a big power tool store.
>2. Buy a generator.
>3. Buy a whole bunch of gas.
>4. Start said generator
>5. Plug in tools
>6. Build.
Booo! Hissss! Generators as a sole source are often the worst choice
for home power. Their only advantage is low up-front cost. But in the
long run they'll cost more, and are no fun to live with compared to
solar/wind/inverter/battery. Home use tends to be relatively high
energy but low power, while shop use tends to be high power but low
energy. So adding shop power usually means increasing charging sources
and batteries a little, but making the inverters substantially larger.
And if one were to choose a generator well suited for shop use, it's
likely to be way too big for backup on a properly sized home power
setup.
Wayne
| |
|
| On 14 Jun 2005 13:42:00 -0700, "arw01" <arwomack01@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
quote:
>Only real solution for running tools at home is a generator.
Nonsense.
Wayne
| |
| Steve Peterson 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| How many of these tools are going to operate at the same time? What do
those amps add up to? With some extra margin, that is the demand you need
to satisfy. It isn't the sum of all the tools, unless they will all be
running at the same time.
Steve
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118776073.386508.60230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully get a
> good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if this offends
> anyone.
>
> When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
> what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
> homepower environment where every amp is precious?
>
> Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
>
> Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
>
> When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
> grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is off
> grid?
>
> Special operations like welding and using air compressors would seem to
> need consideration because of their unique requirements.
>
> I would be interested in hearing how others have approached this
> situation and what implementations they have adopted.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions or comments that you can offer.
>
> TMT
>
| |
| Mike Henry 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
|
"MikeMandaville" <MikeMandaville@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1118779337.527192.155210@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> And for those who might think that fart gas, otherwise known as bio
> gas, is unrealistic, here is the Mother Earth News "Plowboy Interview"
> of L. John Fry, who powered his farm with a generator turned by an
> engine which ran on this gas. This engine ran non-stop for six solid
> years:
>
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel...s/fryintvu.html
>
AIR, it's possible to get somewhere in the neighborhood of 2-6 CF of methane
from a dry pound of biomass. It's interesting to ponder how many pounds of
biomass one must produce to replace the total consumption of natural gas in
the US. The idea can make sense in some situations but is far from a
universal solution.
| |
| MrSilly 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| I think there are other considerations besides efficiency. This depends
on your method of power generation, and how often you work. Cordless
tools can be useful because you can charge them when you have peak
power available from your source. The same is true for compressed air.
If your home's battery bank is fully charged, you can divert your
energy to building spare power for the shop in your cordless batteries,
and building up compression in your air tank.
I also think that, depending on how you work, the loads may not be so
bad. You most likely don't crank your saws constantly for hours on end.
You use these things in bursts. You may be able schedule your work so
that the extra load from these machines is manageable.
| |
|
|
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118776073.386508.60230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully get a
> good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if this offends
> anyone.
>
> When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
> what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
> homepower environment where every amp is precious?
>
> Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
>
> Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
>
> When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
> grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is off
> grid?
>
> Special operations like welding and using air compressors would seem to
> need consideration because of their unique requirements.
>
> I would be interested in hearing how others have approached this
> situation and what implementations they have adopted.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions or comments that you can offer.
>
> TMT
>
Have you ever been in an Amish woodshop? The last time I was in one it had
very many modern woodworking machines all driven by a jackshaft. There was
a Deutz diesel engine powering the jackshaft. The amish farmers in PA where
I grew up used the same diesel engine driving a jackshaft arrangement to
pump water, compress air, run the refridgeration units for their bulk tanks
and pump water. As a side note to this, they used an interesting pump down
the well that used compressed air as power to pump the water up to a holding
tank.
Shawn
| |
| John P Bengi 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| Some people, unlike you, have a real life though.
"wmbjk" <wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net> wrote in message
news:l5iua19akfhnla80npf692gtb99mmqvifs@4ax.com...
quote:
> On 14 Jun 2005 12:55:15 -0700, "FriscoSoxFan" <junk@kreusch.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Booo! Hissss! Generators as a sole source are often the worst choice
> for home power. Their only advantage is low up-front cost. But in the
> long run they'll cost more, and are no fun to live with compared to
> solar/wind/inverter/battery. Home use tends to be relatively high
> energy but low power, while shop use tends to be high power but low
> energy. So adding shop power usually means increasing charging sources
> and batteries a little, but making the inverters substantially larger.
> And if one were to choose a generator well suited for shop use, it's
> likely to be way too big for backup on a properly sized home power
> setup.
>
> Wayne
| |
| John Grossbohlin 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
|
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118776073.386508.60230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
>I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully get a
> good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if this offends
> anyone.
>
> When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
> what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
> homepower environment where every amp is precious?
clip
quote:
> I would be interested in hearing how others have approached this
> situation and what implementations they have adopted.
>
> Thanks for any suggestions or comments that you can offer.
I worked in a shop with no electric and no "alternative power" tools... We
had a forge with bellows, anvil, hardies, tongs, etc., out back for metal
shaping and welding and a large selection of files, screw plates, hacksaws,
etc. For woodworking there were axes, adzes, spoke shaves, draw knives,
frame saws, panel saws, rasps, spring pole lathe, etc. Light came through
the windows... It's doable... At the time there was a 10 year waiting list
for our output.
John
| |
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| FYI...I have had several emails expressing interest in this discussion.
Some of them are from viewers in Florida who commented that this topic
is revelant to their situation after last year's storms. It would seem
that many were without power for many weeks/months and were living
subsistence energy wise for a long period of time while they were
trying to rebuild their lives and property.
As one person said.." you never realize how much you rely on your power
drill until you don't have the juice to run it".
TMT
| |
| Andy Dingley 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:21:32 -0000, bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert
Bonomi) wrote:
quote:
>Charging batteries is *extremely* ineffcient.
That depends. For a typical windpower setup, you have an excess of power
you can't store when you don't need it, then a shortage when you do.
Even inefficient batteries can improve _overall_ efficiency
--
Cats have nine lives, which is why they rarely post to Usenet.
| |
| Andy Dingley 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| On 14 Jun 2005 12:07:53 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
quote:
>When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
>what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
>homepower environment where every amp is precious?
Don't use the amps. I can't see any scenario where powering these tools
(bigger than trivial) from an existing setup where "every amp is
precious" can be viable. For lighting it's a different matter - simply
upping the battery capacity might be enough.
And what's the shortage here ? Amps or coulombs ? Is the limit on power
(ability to deliver it) or energy (stored capacity) ?
For convenience, go for a generator. You can use standard tools, the
cost of doing this is low, the convenience is high. For an occasional
use setup, or particularly for construction work, then this is almost
always the best way.
For improved efficiency, then go to lineshafts and a separate internal
combustion prime mover. This is likely to mean pre-WW2 vintage tools
though, and slow-speed metalworking rather than our modern high-speed
cutting. One of my neighbours has a 1900 house with its original
(commercial light engineering) workshop - power comes from a 12hp gas
engine (town gas, not gasoline) and it powers several lathes, mill and
drill by lineshaft. All still operational too! This seems more viable
for wood than for metal though.
With centralised lineshaft power, you're also geared up to use a water
turbine. I can't see this working for wind power, but water is certainly
viable. I've seen old UK cereal watermills which have had modern lathes
or potter's wheels attached to them, and smithing has regularly done
this to drive power hammers. The well-known Taunton press "Workshops"
book has photos and drawings in it of "Ben's Mill" in Vermont, a
water-powered mill with a 1900s iron water turbine, now supplemented by
a tractor.
A timber yard I use is on an old farm. It has a number of electric
machines, but the main rip saw is powered by a tractor and flat belt.
There's now a dedicated stripped-down tractor, on a permanent brick
footing.
A more modern approach than lineshafting is hydraulics. There are a
number of US religious groups (Amish, AFAIR) where there are
prohibitions on electric machinery. However a centralised diesel
hydraulic power pack and individual hydraulic motors are acceptable. Not
cheap though!
One of the simplest options is to not use powered tools at all. Why do
you need a workshop? What are you trying to make ? If you're a green
woodworker than you can use a shave horse and drawknife for much shaping
work, a pole, treadle or great-wheel lathe for turning (powered either
by the operator, or an assistant). Many such workers may also use these
in conjunction with a Wood-mizer or similar large bandsaw, with its own
petrol engine.
--
Cats have nine lives, which is why they rarely post to Usenet.
| |
| Andy Dingley 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:41:55 -0500, "Mike Henry" <MichaelHenry@msn.com>
wrote:
quote:
>The idea can make sense in some situations but is far from a
>universal solution.
I've actually built one of these things. The justification was as much
waste disposal (dairy farm) as it was for power generation.
| |
|
| On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:19:59 -0400, "John P Bengi" <JBengi
(spamm)@(spamm) yahoo,com> wrote:
quote:
>"wmbjk" <wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net> wrote in message
>news:l5iua19akfhnla80npf692gtb99mmqvifs@4ax.com...
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Some people, unlike you, have a real life though.
1. If you think that generators on their own make good sense for
permanent off-grid workshops, then that's another subject that your
sock puppet army doesn't know squat about.
2. Any guy who'd post under the name "pizza girl" shouldn't be allowed
around electricity or power tools, unless it's for electroshock
therapy, or for having a frontal lobotomy hole drilled.
3. Two of your identities, including the one you're using now, already
claimed to have killfiled me, so any response from you to my posts is
just more BS.
Wayne
| |
| F. George McDuffee 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| <snip>
quote:
>When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working capabilities,
>what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop in an alternate
>homepower environment where every amp is precious?
<snip>
Given the current economic/social/political environment your
concerns are well founded, however I think the primary or basic
problem will not be limited or unavailable [electrical] power,
but rather the more pervasive and dangerous problem of a lack of
spare parts, raw materials and most critical HSS and carbide
tools and blanks.
Whether by design or stupidity, the American
manufacturing/industrial infrastructure is rapidly being
destroyed, primarily by management "outsourcing" and plant
transfer.
With the trade deficit [current account trade balance]
approaching 2 billion dollars *PER DAY* it does not require a
degree in rocket science or a tarot deck to see that the time is
near when imports by the U.S. economy will be on a C.O.D. or even
a "pre-pay" basis [in gold, not dollars].
Given the U.S. has a very limited (and rapidly diminishing)
domestic production capacity for machine tools [lathes, mills,
gear shapers, etc.], C.N.C. controllers, and perhaps most
critical M2 HSS and carbide inserts, this means the entire house
of cards will collapse as the existing machinery wears out,
replacements are unobtainable, and repair cannot be attempted.
Re-industrialization will be very expensive, time consuming and
dangerous, as even the most basic industries such as iron
foundries will have to be reestablished. Indeed, a generation or
more will be required, as the evolution, techniques and lessons
of the period 1890-1930 will have to be retraced, with no
assurance that the time required will be available before America
must again meet a serious international challenge to its
existence / hegemony.
| |
| twillmon@cybermesa.net 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
|
On 2005-06-14 too_many_tools@yahoo.com said:
quote:
>Newsgroups: alt.energy.homepower,rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.
>woodworking
>I am posting this subject in three different groups to hopefully
>get a good cross section of ideas. I apologize ahead of time if
>this offends anyone.
>When one considers a workshop with metal and wood working
>capabilities, what tradeoffs have you made to have a working shop
>in an alternate homepower environment where every amp is precious?
>Obviously hand nonpowered tools take on a special importance.
>Cordless tools come to mind but which ones and what batteries?
>When considerng stationary tools like drills, lathes, mills, saws,
>grinders, etc., which ones fit best in an environment where one is
>off grid?
>Special operations like welding and using air compressors would
>seem to need consideration because of their unique requirements.
>I would be interested in hearing how others have approached this
>situation and what implementations they have adopted.
>Thanks for any suggestions or comments that you can offer.
>TMT
My shop contains a 1HP air compressor (real, 1970's DeVilbiss), Miller
135amp 120volt MIG welder, metal lathe, drill press, radial-arm saw,
small table saw, assorted powered hand tools.
Because of all the motors, I chose a Trace sinewave inverter, 4KW to
cover starting surges (SW4024). Battery is 550 amp-hour, 24 volt,
T-105 golf cart, 3 parallel strings of 4 each. 1 KW of PV panels (16
Solarex 64 watt). System is in its 6th year of operation, supplying
household and work needs.
I work alone, so machines are run singly. Duty cycle is low; so is
energy consumption. I have yet to need to run a generator to cover
my working load, though I do use it to maintain the battery in our
rare cloudy weather, then avoiding power-intensive work.
When the shop was under construction, power initially was from the
generator. Most of the time is just sat, thrashing at no load, being
totally inefficient. Later construction was powered by the solar
system, blessedly silently recharging itself in between power draws.
When I have production welding, sand blasting, or intensive use of an
air-powered die grinder, I will probably have to use the generator,
passing power through the inverter and maintaining the battery
charge.
Tom Willmon
near Mountainair, (mid) New Mexico, USA
Net-Tamer V 1.12.0 - Registered
| |
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| Thanks for posting...actual daily experience carries alot of weight.
What is the largest motor that your equipment has?
Any of them three phase? I ask because many times industrial equipment
has three phase motors.
Any desire for changing any of the motors to DC?
TMT
| |
| Matt Stawicki 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
| On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:36:34 -0700, F. George McDuffee
<gmcduffee@fpc.cc.tx.us> wrote:
quote:
><snip>
><snip>
>Given the current economic/social/political environment your
>concerns are well founded, however I think the primary or basic
>problem will not be limited or unavailable [electrical] power,
>but rather the more pervasive and dangerous problem of a lack of
>spare parts, raw materials and most critical HSS and carbide
>tools and blanks. =20
>
>Whether by design or stupidity, the American
>manufacturing/industrial infrastructure is rapidly being
>destroyed, primarily by management "outsourcing" and plant
>transfer.
>
>With the trade deficit [current account trade balance]
>approaching 2 billion dollars *PER DAY* it does not require a
>degree in rocket science or a tarot deck to see that the time is
>near when imports by the U.S. economy will be on a C.O.D. or even
>a "pre-pay" basis [in gold, not dollars]. =20
>
>Given the U.S. has a very limited (and rapidly diminishing)
>domestic production capacity for machine tools [lathes, mills,
>gear shapers, etc.], C.N.C. controllers, and perhaps most
>critical M2 HSS and carbide inserts, this means the entire house
>of cards will collapse as the existing machinery wears out,
>replacements are unobtainable, and repair cannot be attempted.
>
>Re-industrialization will be very expensive, time consuming and
>dangerous, as even the most basic industries such as iron
>foundries will have to be reestablished. Indeed, a generation or
>more will be required, as the evolution, techniques and lessons
>of the period 1890-1930 will have to be retraced, with no
>assurance that the time required will be available before America
>must again meet a serious international challenge to its
>existence / hegemony.=20
>
>
Well, hell. Might as well just cash in your chips now. Take a quick
vacation, and then head for your local crematorium.=20
Sheesh, George. You really need to get out more:-)
Matt
| |
| Ulysses 2005-06-16, 2:22 pm |
|
"wmbjk" <wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net> wrote in message
news:aphua1pdi90qec4bgi5okqso0ct3q5k9df@4ax.com...
quote:
> On 14 Jun 2005 12:07:53 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
We have a few limitations - Hypertherm 600 suffers nuisance
quote:
> cut-outs above 45 Amps. It will also temporarily shut down if the
> compressor starts mid-cut. So I let the compressor tank fill, then
> shut the pump power off before starting the cut.
I only use my compressor for about 15-30 minutes a day. Right now I'm using
a gasoline generator to run it but I am considering the possibility of using
a belt-driven generator and replacing the AC motor with a 12 VDC motor. For
my purposes it won't matter much if it takes a little longer (lower gear
ratio on the compressor) to fill the tank. I also always manage to find
something to do while compressor is filling the tank anyway. The main
problem I see with a 12 volt compressor is motor life and having to change
the brushes etc.
I also use more human-powered tools than I would if I was connected to the
grid. For example I make custom picture frames and I can either (in most
cases) use a big noisy double-miter saw that uses a lot of power and throws
sawdust all over the place or use a foot-powered chopper that makes hardly
any noise and produces wood chips that I expect will be suitable fuel for
the woodgas generator that I plan to build in the not-to-distant future.
A few people mentioned that cordless tools are ineffecient but hey, it sure
is nice to be able to grab a cordless drill when you only need to drill a
couple of small holes and not have to go start anything up or turn anything
else on.
| |
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
| Thanks for the reply.
I would agree that cordless tools have a spot in the AHP workshop since
one can recharge them during off load hours.
Where would one find 12v motors in the suitable HP and speeds to
retrofit something like a table saw?
In considering this subject, a lineshaft approach does come to mind but
unfortunately you rarely see the needed equipment at HD or Lowes. I am
not to crazy about chucking all the stationary power tools that have
taken me decades to collect. Also, lineshafts take up room, linedriven
tools are required to stay in one place and cannot be mounted on wheels
to optimize shop space as needed. A workshop should be no larger than
necessary for the heating/cooling aspect that also takes energy.
TMT
| |
|
|
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
quote:
>Thanks for the reply.
>
>I would agree that cordless tools have a spot in the AHP workshop since
>one can recharge them during off load hours.
>
>Where would one find 12v motors in the suitable HP and speeds to
>retrofit something like a table saw?
>
>In considering this subject, a lineshaft approach does come to mind but
>unfortunately you rarely see the needed equipment at HD or Lowes. I am
>not to crazy about chucking all the stationary power tools that have
>taken me decades to collect. Also, lineshafts take up room, linedriven
>tools are required to stay in one place and cannot be mounted on wheels
>to optimize shop space as needed. A workshop should be no larger than
>necessary for the heating/cooling aspect that also takes energy.
>
>TMT
>
>
>
There was a recent article in one of the wood working magazines about
cordless tools on the higher end beginning to use lithium ion batteries
instead of nicads. Apparently they can give one hell of a current draw
and run at a slightly higher voltage (28V?). Anyway, along with the
usual benefits for contractors on cordless drills and such there was
great promise for cordless table saws and larger equipment due to the
ability to run for extended periods at the higher current draw.
It doesn't help today but there is hope in the near future for the
off-gridders and job site work.
Koz
| |
| Scott Willing 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
| On 15 Jun 2005 11:36:20 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
<too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
quote:
>Thanks for the reply.
>
>I would agree that cordless tools have a spot in the AHP workshop since
>one can recharge them during off load hours.
>
>Where would one find 12v motors in the suitable HP and speeds to
>retrofit something like a table saw?
>
>In considering this subject, a lineshaft approach does come to mind but
>unfortunately you rarely see the needed equipment at HD or Lowes. I am
>not to crazy about chucking all the stationary power tools that have
>taken me decades to collect. Also, lineshafts take up room, linedriven
>tools are required to stay in one place and cannot be mounted on wheels
>to optimize shop space as needed. A workshop should be no larger than
>necessary for the heating/cooling aspect that also takes energy.
>
>TMT
I really hesitate to jump in on this topic, but I advise you to make
sure to do your research carefully before pursuing the replacement of
AC motors with DC motors.
In the early days of homepower which was nearly universally 12V on the
primary side, this was a pretty common practice, but in the overall
picture of things today I'm not sure it's warranted in the general
case.
At one time I was given to understand that DC motors are just innately
more efficient than AC. It appears that this is not necessarily so,
and has much to do with the crappy design and build quality of
"shovelware" AC motors than any basic electromechanical principles. To
know whether you would actually be further ahead after a DC
conversion, you would have to consider each case individually.
Ignoring power factor, a 12V load of power "x" draws 10 times the
current that an 120VAC load will draw. Will the losses you avoid by
bypassing the inverter get chewed up in the wire? How close to the
battery room will the workshop be?
I started out at 12V primary by virtue of buying a house with an
existing PV system. Like many frontier homebrew systems, it had
started as a purely DC system to which an inverter was added later.
Having no plumbing in the house, I've acquired a number of small 12V
pumps for various specific purposes, such as our bucket shower.
Fortunately this hasn't represented a significant investment. With
each system upgrade I left myself options for going to a higher
primary voltage, and recently made the move to 24V when we replaced
our chargerless mod square wave inverter with a sine wave
inverter/charger. At some distant point in the future we might even
make the jump to 48V, but for the moment, 24V was "just right."
The punchline is that our little pumps (and other 12V DC loads) are
now running off a 24V/12V DC-DC converter. In the overall picture of
things this crazy scenario actually still makes sense here, but again
these are *small* loads.
The moral is that when you choose to run DC loads, you're creating
specialized equipment and there are serious implications that might
not be immediately obvious. If you stick with AC loads, your wire runs
can be far longer for a given power throughput / wire guage, you can
reconfigure the primary side of your system without affecting anything
on the load side, use a common AC generator when it's more convenient
or more sensible to do so, or take your gear with you and use it
elsewhere.
Having "inherited" a mixed DC/AC system and lived with it, off-grid,
for five years, there is no question in my mind that the new house we
build here will be wired almost entirely for conventional AC and will
likely have only some emergency lighting (power room!), and perhaps a
few very special-purpose devices and outlets wired for DC.
YMMV.
-=s
| |
| MikeMandaville 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
| > Well, hell. Might as well just cash in your chips now. Take a quick
quote:
> vacation, and then head for your local crematorium.
>
> Matt
Many of these are now self-service. You just put your money in the
machine, and then lie down in your coffin. :-)
Mike Mandaville
| |
|
| In article <1118849176.114205.118790@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
quote:
> Thanks for posting...actual daily experience carries alot of weight.
>
> What is the largest motor that your equipment has?
>
> Any of them three phase? I ask because many times industrial equipment
> has three phase motors.
>
> Any desire for changing any of the motors to DC?
>
> TMT
>
3 Phase motors really aren't a problem if you just use a FreqDrive that
is 1 Phase input and 3 Phase output.
Me
| |
| Ulysses 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
|
"Scott Willing" <NOTwilling2BSPAMMED@mts.net> wrote in message
news:gvu0b1t6l2777mhv4qma4vt010dg2gepo9@4ax.com...
quote:
> On 15 Jun 2005 11:36:20 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I really hesitate to jump in on this topic, but I advise you to make
> sure to do your research carefully before pursuing the replacement of
> AC motors with DC motors.
>
> In the early days of homepower which was nearly universally 12V on the
> primary side, this was a pretty common practice, but in the overall
> picture of things today I'm not sure it's warranted in the general
> case.
>
> At one time I was given to understand that DC motors are just innately
> more efficient than AC. It appears that this is not necessarily so,
> and has much to do with the crappy design and build quality of
> "shovelware" AC motors than any basic electromechanical principles. To
> know whether you would actually be further ahead after a DC
> conversion, you would have to consider each case individually.
> Ignoring power factor, a 12V load of power "x" draws 10 times the
> current that an 120VAC load will draw. Will the losses you avoid by
> bypassing the inverter get chewed up in the wire? How close to the
> battery room will the workshop be?
I absolutely agree with what you are saying. This is why the on-grid folks
are using Tesla's design and not Edison's DC idea. For a house I also think
it's probably not worth the trouble to run massive wires everywhere in order
to use DC effeciently. Of course the higher the voltage the smaller the
wire required, which brings you right back to 115VAC. Probably better to
have a few extra batteries and a couple of extra solar panels (or whatever)
to cover the loss of effeciency. When I first started reading about wind
generators about 20 or so years ago they were talking about 120 volt
generators charging batteries in series equaling 120 VDC. According to the
author most appliances wouldn't care if it was AC or DC. This idea is
definately simpler than having to buy and connect an expensive sine wave
inverter but I suspect that today's electronics might be a bit more
particular about their input current than a 20 year old dishwasher or vacuum
cleaner. If someone wanted to try it I suppose the best thing to do would
be to buy a new whatever and make sure you can return it. If it explodes
you go get your money back. And of course there's always the problem of
short circuits burning the house down.
However, for a stand-alone workshop that is to be powered seperately I would
consider using DC as opposed to running a gasoline/diesel generator on one
or two tools that I use regularly. For those that I only use occasionally
for me it's no big deal to start up a little generator (most of my saws etc
run fine from a Honda eu2000). As someone else pointed out running a
compressor during peak sunlight or wind times (or when a generator happens
to be running) and filling the tank can, at least in my case, supply enough
air to do quite a bit of work later without having to use any additional
power. Leaks, in this case, cannot be allowed to exist!
quote:
>
> I started out at 12V primary by virtue of buying a house with an
> existing PV system. Like many frontier homebrew systems, it had
> started as a purely DC system to which an inverter was added later.
>
> Having no plumbing in the house, I've acquired a number of small 12V
> pumps for various specific purposes, such as our bucket shower.
> Fortunately this hasn't represented a significant investment. With
> each system upgrade I left myself options for going to a higher
> primary voltage, and recently made the move to 24V when we replaced
> our chargerless mod square wave inverter with a sine wave
> inverter/charger. At some distant point in the future we might even
> make the jump to 48V, but for the moment, 24V was "just right."
>
> The punchline is that our little pumps (and other 12V DC loads) are
> now running off a 24V/12V DC-DC converter. In the overall picture of
> things this crazy scenario actually still makes sense here, but again
> these are *small* loads.
Lol. As long as you don't plug a battery charger into it to charge the
batteries it's running off of ;-)
quote:
>
> The moral is that when you choose to run DC loads, you're creating
> specialized equipment and there are serious implications that might
> not be immediately obvious. If you stick with AC loads, your wire runs
> can be far longer for a given power throughput / wire guage, you can
> reconfigure the primary side of your system without affecting anything
> on the load side, use a common AC generator when it's more convenient
> or more sensible to do so, or take your gear with you and use it
> elsewhere.
I keep toying with the idea (12 volt motors) but I still use a gasoline
generator for the sizeable, short use loads. When it comes right down to it
I'm probably only using about 2 to 3 gallons of gasoline per month to run my
tools to produce around $15,000 worth of revenue. From a business
standpoint this is an insignificant expenditure. I simply manage the use of
my power tools and do work in batches. I don't work after the sun goes down
(usually, unless it's a RUSH order).
quote:
>
> Having "inherited" a mixed DC/AC system and lived with it, off-grid,
> for five years, there is no question in my mind that the new house we
> build here will be wired almost entirely for conventional AC and will
> likely have only some emergency lighting (power room!), and perhaps a
> few very special-purpose devices and outlets wired for DC.
>
> YMMV.
>
> -=s
>
| |
| Ulysses 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
|
"Matt Stawicki" <stawickiREMOVE@sciti.com> wrote in message
news:41m0b1ludgarbac6nu97vbuu5f20rifjan@4ax.com...
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:36:34 -0700, F. George McDuffee
<gmcduffee@fpc.cc.tx.us> wrote:
quote:
><snip>
><snip>
>Given the current economic/social/political environment your
>concerns are well founded, however I think the primary or basic
>problem will not be limited or unavailable [electrical] power,
>but rather the more pervasive and dangerous problem of a lack of
>spare parts, raw materials and most critical HSS and carbide
>tools and blanks.
>
>Whether by design or stupidity, the American
>manufacturing/industrial infrastructure is rapidly being
>destroyed, primarily by management "outsourcing" and plant
>transfer.
>
>With the trade deficit [current account trade balance]
>approaching 2 billion dollars *PER DAY* it does not require a
>degree in rocket science or a tarot deck to see that the time is
>near when imports by the U.S. economy will be on a C.O.D. or even
>a "pre-pay" basis [in gold, not dollars].
>
>Given the U.S. has a very limited (and rapidly diminishing)
>domestic production capacity for machine tools [lathes, mills,
>gear shapers, etc.], C.N.C. controllers, and perhaps most
>critical M2 HSS and carbide inserts, this means the entire house
>of cards will collapse as the existing machinery wears out,
>replacements are unobtainable, and repair cannot be attempted.
>
>Re-industrialization will be very expensive, time consuming and
>dangerous, as even the most basic industries such as iron
>foundries will have to be reestablished. Indeed, a generation or
>more will be required, as the evolution, techniques and lessons
>of the period 1890-1930 will have to be retraced, with no
>assurance that the time required will be available before America
>must again meet a serious international challenge to its
>existence / hegemony.
>
>
Well, hell. Might as well just cash in your chips now. Take a quick
vacation, and then head for your local crematorium.
Sheesh, George. You really need to get out more:-)
Matt
Somehow methinks supply and demand will take care of itself.
| |
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
| I would agree but an VFD that is unnecessary is a current draw that is
not needed.
Like any system, one needs to plan a workshop as a whole.
At this point, I could go single phase, 3 phase or DC motors on on all
my machines. One of the reasons why I started this discussion was to
make that decision based partially on the experiences of others who
have hopefully gone before me.
TMT
| |
| Too_Many_Tools 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
| Thanks for your posting.
Your discussion is one of the major reasons for me starting this
thread. As I soon discovered when I started research into the design of
an AHP workshop...that the continuing progression of technology
(especially that of inverter design) changes the approach that one
should take in implementing a AHP system today.
While the lure to go "no power" is strong, I am no Luddite. Power
tools, both portable and stationary, have their place in a AHP
workshop. The opportunity to leverage consumer offerings allows one to
use conventional tools with minimal hassles. I also have a large
collection of older metal and wood working tools that would be awkward
to convert to something other than AC. In the past, I have always had a
policy of trying to do as little a modification as possible to a tool
since it is never a simple as it first seems. Machine tools were
designed with certain speed and torque requirements in mind and when
one departs from these, the tool's performance suffers.
Thanks for your input and please always feel welcome to contribute to
any of my discussions.
TMT
| |
|
| Gimmy-John P BengiBoob wrote:
quote:
> Some people, unlike you, have a real life though.
You wouldn't be in a position to know, you top posting loon.
mike
| |
| Pete C. 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
| Too_Many_Tools wrote:
quote:
>
> I would agree but an VFD that is unnecessary is a current draw that is
> not needed.
>
> Like any system, one needs to plan a workshop as a whole.
>
> At this point, I could go single phase, 3 phase or DC motors on on all
> my machines. One of the reasons why I started this discussion was to
> make that decision based partially on the experiences of others who
> have hopefully gone before me.
>
> TMT
I've been following this thread with some interest and now have some
thoughts and comments to add to it.
I may have missed something along the way, but I don't recall you
specifying what type(s) of alternative energy sources you have
available. This makes quite a difference in determining the best
options.
As an example, if your alternate source(s) provide mechanical power such
as found with water power, wind power, or a solar boiler driving a
turbine or steam engine, then air power could be quite advantageous.
A source of mechanical energy can directly drive a compressor head,
saving the extremely inefficient conversions to electricity and back.
Compressed air is easy and economical to store in large volumes and is
free from the chemical hazards of batteries. Useable service life of
compressed air tanks is much higher than batteries as well.
In addition to the obvious air tools, compressed air can also be used to
power things such as refrigeration if you use the belt driven type
refrigeration compressors.
Those mechanical energy sources can also simultaneously drive electrical
generators to charge conventional batteries for loads such as lighting.
Battery charging for cordless tools is no less efficient that the
charging of your "regular" battery string, as long as the charging is
limited to peak energy generation times.
The efficiency of converting DC from your battery string to AC so you
can use conventional appliances is fairly good with modern inverters.
The conversion efficiency also improves when you use a higher voltage
battery string since inverters switching higher voltages at lower
currents will have lower resistive / heat losses.
Solar PV conversion efficiency is incredibly low to begin with and PV
cost is high so if that is your only energy source you really do need to
watch every miliamp. Of course, even with that inefficiency a solar PV
panel charging batteries for your cordless tools is just fine as long as
it has the capacity to keep up with your usage.
For items like welders that require huge gulps of power it's really
difficult to get away from an IC engine / generator for practicality. A
decent welder / generator can serve two needs and may be the most
practical solution.
If you've got really good water power available you could probably use
it to drive the head from an engine driven welder. A DC inverter type
welder could probably be modified to accept DC from a large battery
bank, but that would require you to have a fairly high voltage battery
string to be practical.
Someone else posted about the differences in energy needs of a shop vs.
home. They had more or less the correct idea, but got their terminology
a bit out of whack. A shop has mostly high peak energy loads at low duty
cycles and a home has mostly low peak loads with high duty cycles. The
total energy consumption over the course of a day could be similar
depending on how busy the shop is.
Pete C.
| |
| Ulysses 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
|
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1118860579.426896.146210@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
quote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I would agree that cordless tools have a spot in the AHP workshop since
> one can recharge them during off load hours.
>
> Where would one find 12v motors in the suitable HP and speeds to
> retrofit something like a table saw?
While searching for a fan motor I came across some substantial DC motors on
eBay a while back. I think they may have been blower motors for furnaces or
air conditioners. What I had in mind was using a belt drive. I would think
it might be more difficult to find one that has the right shaft for a saw,
especially one with reverse threads. Come to think of it a DC powered saw
might make it possible (or at least safer) to use fluorescent lights in a
shop since it would not be running at 60 Hz.
Grainger has DC motors too.
http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/se...sults.jsp?xi=xi
quote:
>
> In considering this subject, a lineshaft approach does come to mind but
> unfortunately you rarely see the needed equipment at HD or Lowes. I am
> not to crazy about chucking all the stationary power tools that have
> taken me decades to collect. Also, lineshafts take up room, linedriven
> tools are required to stay in one place and cannot be mounted on wheels
> to optimize shop space as needed. A workshop should be no larger than
> necessary for the heating/cooling aspect that also takes energy.
>
> TMT
>
| |
| Ulysses 2005-06-16, 2:23 pm |
|
"Scott Willing" <NOTwilling2BSPAMMED@mts.net> wrote in message
news:gvu0b1t6l2777mhv4qma4vt010dg2gepo9@4ax.com...
quote:
> On 15 Jun 2005 11:36:20 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
> <too_many_tools@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I started out at 12V primary by virtue of buying a house with an
> existing PV system. Like many frontier homebrew systems, it had
> started as a purely DC system to which an inverter was added later.
>
> Having no plumbing in the house, I've acquired a number of small 12V
> pumps for various specific purposes, such as our bucket shower.
Just curious, but how do you go to the bathroom? Composting toilet?
Outhouse?
| |
| wmbjk 2005-06-17, 11:31 pm |
| On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:43:10 GMT, "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net>
wrote:
quote:
>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>I've been following this thread with some interest and now have some
>thoughts and comments to add to it.
>
>I may have missed something along the way, but I don't recall you
>specifying what type(s) of alternative energy sources you have
>available. This makes quite a difference in determining the best
>options.
>
>As an example, if your alternate source(s) provide mechanical power such
>as found with water power, wind power, or a solar boiler driving a
>turbine or steam engine, then air power could be quite advantageous.
>
>A source of mechanical energy can directly drive a compressor head,
>saving the extremely inefficient conversions to electricity and back.
>Compressed air is easy and economical to store in large volumes and is
>free from the chemical hazards of batteries. Useable service life of
>compressed air tanks is much higher than batteries as well.
Wind driven compressor -> storage tank -> air motors? Could be OK if
one had a really windy site, lots of surplus pressure vessels, and a
plenty of rotor diameter. To get an idea of the diameter versus work
produced, check out the size and pumping rates of Bowjon well pumps.
quote:
>In addition to the obvious air tools, compressed air can also be used to
>power things such as refrigeration if you use the belt driven type
>refrigeration compressors.
Mechanical drive all the way to the pump? That would work well with a
large mill, when the wind is blowing, and be as efficient as these
http://www.deanbennett.com/windmills.htm. But in that application
there's the advantage of easy storage for when there's no wind.
quote:
>Those mechanical energy sources can also simultaneously drive electrical
>generators to charge conventional batteries for loads such as lighting.
Which is why the conventional rotor/alternator is so popular with home
power users. Ours is similar to this one
http://www.windenergy.com/whisper_200.htm.
quote:
>Battery charging for cordless tools is no less efficient that the
>charging of your "regular" battery string, as long as the charging is
>limited to peak energy generation times.
For the usual home power setup, cordless tools are no more and no less
advantageous than they are on-grid. Unless the power setup is very
small, the double conversion isn't worth trying to work around.
quote:
>The efficiency of converting DC from your battery string to AC so you
>can use conventional appliances is fairly good with modern inverters.
>The conversion efficiency also improves when you use a higher voltage
>battery string since inverters switching higher voltages at lower
>currents will have lower resistive / heat losses.
>
>Solar PV conversion efficiency is incredibly low to begin with and PV
>cost is high so if that is your only energy source you really do need to
>watch every miliamp.
That depends. On very small systems, it's often true. Our setup isn't
huge, and costs about as much as a medium priced SUV. The idle loads
are about 100 Watts 24-7. That's a waste versus
convenience/practicality issue, and it's a long way from watching
every milliamp.
quote:
>Of course, even with that inefficiency a solar PV
>panel charging batteries for your cordless tools is just fine as long as
>it has the capacity to keep up with your usage.
>
>For items like welders that require huge gulps of power it's really
>difficult to get away from an IC engine / generator for practicality.
Not necessarily. Home welding tends to be short duration. The hardware
to supply that kind of power is actually affordable, and if one is
designing the power system from scratch for what most would consider a
normal home, then the extra inverter capacity isn't a big deal. In our
case, for the house loads alone we could have gotten away with a
single SW4024 plus a transformer for the 220V loads. Instead we used
dual inverters, which eliminated the need for the transformer, and
provided sufficient power for most anything used in the usual home
shop.
quote:
> A decent welder / generator can serve two needs and may be the most
>practical solution.
Welder generators aren't a good match for backup duty, or even for
backup charging. Their advantage is portability for welding, and
they're only best (in the home power context) when you need high amps
for short periods. For any application that needs longer run times
supplying small loads, something like the Honda EU series is far
better. After a few years of living off-grid, like many others I found
that a DC backup generator that works independently of the
inverter/chargers is nice to have. The one I built drives a $5 scrap
Delco 27SI, and only produces about 2000 Watts. When there's no sun or
wind, we can do nicely on about 4 hours run time per day, at a
charging rate that's similar to when the other sources are on line.
quote:
>If you've got really good water power available you could probably use
>it to drive the head from an engine driven welder. A DC inverter type
>welder could probably be modified to accept DC from a large battery
>bank, but that would require you to have a fairly high voltage battery
>string to be practical.
Like some of the other comments in this thread (line shafts for
instance), that suggestion may be feasible. But unless one has way
more time than money, conventional methods are more practical.
quote:
>Someone else posted about the differences in energy needs of a shop vs.
>home. They had more or less the correct idea, but got their terminology
>a bit out of whack. A shop has mostly high peak energy loads at low duty
>cycles and a home has mostly low peak loads with high duty cycles. The
>total energy consumption over the course of a day could be similar
>depending on how busy the shop is.
That was probably me you're talking about, and my terminology was
quite correct for our setup. Occasionally our shop energy use is
higher than for our house, but usually it's the other way around by a
big margin. Normal power tool energy consumption in a home shop is
lost in the noise of an all-electric home's consumption. Welders,
plasma cutters, chop saws, table saws, planers, etc. are all high
power, but relatively low energy because of their short run times.
Keep in mind that we're talking *home* shop here, which I consider to
be small projects by one person. Many off-gridders go the route of
putting a high percentage of their loads onto propane, leaving much
less for the actual power system to do. For them, shop energy
consumption may indeed cause the need for a much larger system, or the
pain and cost of running a big generator. But we're very nearly 100%
solar/wind powered. We don't even have propane, and fuel use for
backup generator and the welder/generator combined isn't much
different than what some folks consume in a season of mowing a big
lawn with a garden tractor.
Here are a couple of my projects from my off-grid shop. I only needed
the engine-driven welder a few times, mostly for its portability.
http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/image...tals%20only.jpg top 40' of
a 65' free-standing wind generator tower (in progress)
http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/images/tower%20top.JPG tower nearly
finished and erected
http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/frank.htm cactus transport
Wayne
| |
| Pete C. 2005-06-17, 11:31 pm |
| wmbjk wrote:
quote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:43:10 GMT, "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> Wind driven compressor -> storage tank -> air motors? Could be OK if
> one had a really windy site, lots of surplus pressure vessels, and a
> plenty of rotor diameter. To get an idea of the diameter versus work
> produced, check out the size and pumping rates of Bowjon well pumps.
Should be comparable or better efficiency than a wind driven generator
charging batteries. In either case you're capturing and storing the
intermittently produced power for later use and a more convenient rate.
A compressor powered by water or a solar steam generator would work well
also.
Various electric utilities have been experimenting with compressed air
storage as a way to store power from excess generating capacity during
off peak times for use later during the peak times. They also do this
with pumped hydro, but CAS is far more practical than pumped hydro in a
homepower environment.
quote:
>
>
> Mechanical drive all the way to the pump? That would work well with a
> large mill, when the wind is blowing, and be as efficient as these
> http://www.deanbennett.com/windmills.htm. But in that application
> there's the advantage of easy storage for when there's no wind.
No, not mechanically driven. The refrigeration compressor would be belt
driven from an air motor. The thermostat simply opens the air valve when
it needs to spin up the compressor. Again the ultimate source of power
does not have to be wind, and in fact with CAS it's even easier to
combine energy captured from multiple sources. No need to worry about
charge controllers when you're simply pumping air into a big tank.
quote:
>
>
> Which is why the conventional rotor/alternator is so popular with home
> power users. Ours is similar to this one
> http://www.windenergy.com/whisper_200.htm.
The point is that batteries can only accept a charge at a certain rate,
potentially wasting captured energy during peaks. There is no such
limitation with an air tank, unless it's already at max capacity. Air
tanks are also a lot less expensive and lower maintenance than battery
strings. By combining both an electrical generator and an air compressor
on the wind plant you can better capture peak output.
The efficiency of directly utilizing the energy of the compressed air
for mechanical applications is also higher. Instead of capturing wind
energy, converting to electricity, storing in a battery, converting to
AC, converting to mechanical energy with a motor, converting to
compressed air with a compressor coupled to the motor and then utilizing
the compresses air to fire your nail gun, you eliminate four conversion
steps.
quote:
>
>
> For the usual home power setup, cordless tools are no more and no less
> advantageous than they are on-grid. Unless the power setup is very
> small, the double conversion isn't worth trying to work around.
I know, but someone posted elsewhere in the thread that charging
cordless tools was horrifically inefficient.
quote:
>
>
> That depends. On very small systems, it's often true. Our setup isn't
> huge, and costs about as much as a medium priced SUV. The idle loads
> are about 100 Watts 24-7. That's a waste versus
> convenience/practicality issue, and it's a long way from watching
> every milliamp.
This is where you really need the hybrid system. You run the inverter to
power your conventional appliances. When you are not running the
appliances you turn the inverter off. You run your lighting and TV and
whatnot that are your much higher duty cycle items from DC and avoid the
conversion.
quote:
>
>
> Not necessarily. Home welding tends to be short duration. The hardware
> to supply that kind of power is actually affordable, and if one is
> designing the power system from scratch for what most would consider a
> normal home, then the extra inverter capacity isn't a big deal. In our
> case, for the house loads alone we could have gotten away with a
> single SW4024 plus a transformer for the 220V loads. Instead we used
> dual inverters, which eliminated the need for the transformer, and
> provided sufficient power for most anything used in the usual home
> shop.
Perhaps your home welding is less than mine. I've got a Miller
Syncrowave 250 that I love and it can see quite a bit of use on project
weekends. I'm thinking your inverters would gag at the 240v 100a gulps
the Syncrowave takes, even if the typical gulp is only about 10 seconds
duration. On a big project those 10 second gulps add up to quite a few
minutes.
I'm on-grid, but having recently moved to an area with much better solar
and wind potential I'm investigating options to take advantage of those
sources.
quote:
>
>
> Welder generators aren't a good match for backup duty, or even for
> backup charging. Their advantage is portability for welding, and
> they're only best (in the home power context) when you need high amps
> for short periods. For any application that needs longer run times
> supplying small loads, something like the Honda EU series is far
> better. After a few years of living off-grid, like many others I found
> that a DC backup generator that works independently of the
> inverter/chargers is nice to have. The one I built drives a $5 scrap
> Delco 27SI, and only produces about 2000 Watts. When there's no sun or
> wind, we can do nicely on about 4 hours run time per day, at a
> charging rate that's similar to when the other sources are on line.
I didn't really intend the welder / generator to be used for backup to
the regular power system. I really meant it more as an option for
powering larger shop tools.
If you want to make it a bit more efficient in this capacity you can
build an automatic transfer switch so that when you are not drawing a
load from the generator to operate say a 5 hp table saw, the capacity
can be diverted to a charger to add some extra power to your regular
battery string.
quote:
>
>
> Like some of the other comments in this thread (line shafts for
> instance), that suggestion may be feasible. But unless one has way
> more time than money, conventional methods are more practical.
Modifying a DC inverter welder which are pretty inexpensive these days
is likely the most efficient way to get quality welding capacity from a
home power system. No line shaft required, and no need for oversized
inverters or load shedding.
quote:
>
>
> That was probably me you're talking about, and my terminology was
> quite correct for our setup. Occasionally our shop energy use is
> higher than for our house, but usually it's the other way around by a
> big margin. Normal power tool energy consumption in a home shop is
> lost in the noise of an all-electric home's consumption. Welders,
> plasma cutters, chop saws, table saws, planers, etc. are all high
> power, but relatively low energy because of their short run times.
Shop = big gulps, house = long sips 
quote:
>
> Keep in mind that we're talking *home* shop here, which I consider to
> be small projects by one person. Many off-gridders go the route of
> putting a high percentage of their loads onto propane, leaving much
> less for the actual power system to do. For them, shop energy
> consumption may indeed cause the need for a much larger system, or the
> pain and cost of running a big generator. But we're very nearly 100%
> solar/wind powered. We don't even have propane, and fuel use for
> backup generator and the welder/generator combined isn't much
> different than what some folks consume in a season of mowing a big
> lawn with a garden tractor.
Well, my home shop which is just for me, includes a Bridgeport mill, a
metal lathe, the big honkin' TIG welder mentioned earlier, a CNC router,
60gal compressor, 10" table saw, an electric forklift and a host of
smaller items like sawsalls and grinders.
This is of course partly attributable to my preference for metal
projects which tend to require bigger tools and more power tools than
woodworking.
quote:
>
> Here are a couple of my projects from my off-grid shop. I only needed
> the engine-driven welder a few times, mostly for its portability.
>
> http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/image...tals%20only.jpg top 40' of
> a 65' free-standing wind generator tower (in progress)
> http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/images/tower%20top.JPG tower nearly
> finished and erected
> http://www.citlink.net/~wmbjk/frank.htm cactus transport
>
> Wayne
Nice projects. Someday I'd like to do that. Somehow it seems to cost
more to live self sufficient off-grid than it does to just pay the
utilities...
Just out of curiosity how do you make a living?
Pete C.
| |
| Scott Willing 2005-06-17, 11:31 pm |
| On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:30:54 -0700, "Ulysses"
<therealulysses@yahoo.com> wrote:
quote:
>
>"Scott Willing" <NOTwilling2BSPAMMED@mts.net> wrote in message
>news:gvu0b1t6l2777mhv4qma4vt010dg2gepo9@4ax.com...
>
>Just curious, but how do you go to the bathroom? Composting toilet?
Yes and no. :-) We have a simple sawdust bucket toilet that sits
beside a commercial composting toilet, now retired. I'm going to tear
out the latter and build a nicer bucket toilet when the time is
available.
Long story, but the commercial toilet is, IMHO, a waste of money.
(Fortunately, wasn't my decision; came with the house.) A bucket
toilet is superior to it in every way.
Most so-called composting toilets, including this one, are actually
evaporating toilets and don't compost per se.
quote:
>Outhouse?
There are two of those here, also retired.
We have shallow groundwater, and an outhouse is an potentially nasty
polluter. Actually septic systems can be just as bad - so many people
manage to pollute their wells with those too. Above-ground aerobic
composting is the way to go IMHO.
-=s
| |
| wmbjk 2005-06-17, 11:31 pm |
| On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:55:15 GMT, "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net>
wrote:
quote:
><compressed air storage> Should be comparable or better efficiency than a wind driven generator
>charging batteries.
Perhaps in some niches... but in any event a practical home power
setup needs some batteries, and charging them with wind, assuming
there's wind to harvest, is highly recommended. So you're talking
about *adding* systems because you believe it's worth the trouble, but
you haven't supplied any numbers or examples to back up your position.
quote:
> They also do this
>with pumped hydro, but CAS is far more practical than pumped hydro in a
>homepower environment.
But both are less practical than batteries.
quote:
>No, not mechanically driven. The refrigeration compressor would be belt
>driven from an air motor. The thermostat simply opens the air valve when
>it needs to spin up the compressor. Again the ultimate source of power
>does not have to be wind, and in fact with CAS it's even easier to
>combine energy captured from multiple sources. No need to worry about
>charge controllers when you're simply pumping air into a big tank.
How big a tank? I think you're going to find a fly in the ointment
once you run some numbers on air consumption. And if air power could
be so efficient and practical, why do you believe it is that
off-gridders, often known to be innovative and unafraid of breaking
with convention, haven't flocked to the concept?
quote:
>The point is that batteries can only accept a charge at a certain rate,
>potentially wasting captured energy during peaks.
There's isn't any peak power wasting problem that I'm aware of with
home power systems, since the cost of generating prevents people from
buying excess capacity. Can you give an example of the problem you're
citing?
quote:
>The efficiency of directly utilizing the energy of the compressed air
>for mechanical applications is also higher. Instead of capturing wind
>energy, converting to electricity, storing in a battery, converting to
>AC, converting to mechanical energy with a motor, converting to
>compressed air with a compressor coupled to the motor and then utilizing
>the compresses air to fire your nail gun, you eliminate four conversion
>steps.
You left out the AC to DC conversion of the turbine, and assumed that
energy used must be stored in a battery first. It's true that
compressed air for tools is a very inefficient process, on-grid or
off. Yet I've managed quite well with the just the same sort of
compressor that grid-connected folks use. I could do wind-powered shop
air more easily than most, but I wouldn't dream of adding another
system to cure an inefficiency that's such a small part of the big
picture.
Coincidentally, I have a neighbor who plans a Bowjon type installation
(low tower, bulky rotor, single-stage compressor) for shop air using
multiple surplus storage tanks. I've suggested that since he hasn't
any wind power at present and could really use some, that the time and
money he's going to put into the new setup would be better spent on a
conventional wind genny and a tall tower.
quote:
>This is where you really need the hybrid system. You run the inverter to
>power your conventional appliances. When you are not running the
>appliances you turn the inverter off.
That's one of those convenience/practicalities tradeoffs. Many
appliances don't like being de-powered, and it's a nuisance to fight
it. IMO, biting the bullet for full time capacity is one of those
things that goes a long way to making off-grid living palatable for
the average person. After a hard day of pining over the dearth of
rural ballet, the last thing you want is to have to reprogram the
clock on the microwave. :-)
quote:
> You run your lighting and TV and
>whatnot that are your much higher duty cycle items from DC and avoid the
>conversion.
The conversion losses are lamentable, but not generally worth working
around. As Scott mentioned, after you've fought that battle for a
while, you're ready for straight AC in order to eliminate the
diddling.
quote:
>Perhaps your home welding is less than mine. I've got a Miller
>Syncrowave 250 that I love and it can see quite a bit of use on project
>weekends. I'm thinking your inverters would gag at the 240v 100a gulps
>the Syncrowave takes, even if the typical gulp is only about 10 seconds
>duration. On a big project those 10 second gulps add up to quite a few
>minutes.
The fuses definitely couldn't handle it - 400A limit (24V system).
What kind of *home* welding are you doing that takes 24k Watts input?
People can size for whatever they can afford, but if I had the need
for more indoor stick/TIG, I'd be after one of these
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...tem=7524207277,
which should be a comfortable fit with our setup. But I find I rarely
stick weld indoors above about 120A, although I use the Powemig 255 up
to its max more often. The only really heavy stuff I have to work on
are the tractors, and that's only occasionally. Since they don't fit
inside, and neither does the smoke and dust of heavy work, I roll an
engine-driven unit outdoors.
quote:
>I didn't really intend the welder / generator to be used for backup to
>the regular power system. I really meant it more as an option for
>powering larger shop tools.
The auto-idle feature of a good unit will make that bearable, if the
tools' idle use is compatible. Still, the generator is going to be
either idling or roaring in between power tool use, at an average of
about $2 per hour in fuel. When we first moved onto our site, but
before we had the power system set up temporarily, I was stuck with
the welder generator. The running hours add up quickly, and I wouldn't
recommend it to anyone else except for occasional or temporary use, or
because there was no alternative, or if it's for a job that pays
enough to cover the expenses and aggravation.
quote:
>Modifying a DC inverter welder which are pretty inexpensive these days
>is likely the most efficient way to get quality welding capacity from a
>home power system. No line shaft required, and no need for oversized
>inverters or load shedding.
Everyone has different needs, wants, and budget, but I think you'll
find that more and more people have a potential combination of house
loads that need such capacity that shop use isn't a leap. Around here
for instance are many who need to power the surge of a 2 hp well pump,
along with other use concurrent. It can be done with a smaller
inverter and a generator, but it's sure nice to get that generator
time down if you can. We used to have a couple nearby who had a
generator/battery/inverter setup, over 10 hours generator time per
day. That's about 4000 hours and 2000 gallons of fuel per year. I
think the fuel cost, repair costs, and eventual generator replacement
cost were big factors in their pulling out after a few years. Even a
modest amount of PV could have cut that generator time in half, and
would have been far cheaper in the long run. Better still, the cost of
that (very nice) generator and fuel could have bought a combination of
hardware including a much smaller generator needing only a few hours
per week run time.
quote:
>Somehow it seems to cost
>more to live self sufficient off-grid than it does to just pay the
>utilities...
Not necessarily. Cashing out of a grid-connected place allowed us to
retire, start with a clean slate, and as the yuppies say, "leverage"
the advantages of home power to help keep the big picture cost down.
Cheap land, lower taxes, fewer utilities (still need the phone
company) are some of the benefits. In talking to off-gridders, I find
that the main factor affecting success isn't so much the power issues,
but whether the folks can afford and are comfortable with truly rural
living. For most, that usually means retirement or telecommuting, and
precludes having children at home. For those who need to commute or be
close to school busses etc., they're usually stuck with paying the
premium for grid access. Then again, when they want to generate their
own power, they can have cheaper and more efficient systems, and use
the grid for storage.
Wayne
| |
| Pete C. 2005-06-17, 11:31 pm |
| wmbjk wrote:
quote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:55:15 GMT, "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps in some niches... but in any event a practical home power
> setup needs some batteries, and charging them with wind, assuming
> there's wind to harvest, is highly recommended. So you're talking
> about *adding* systems because you believe it's worth the trouble, but
> you haven't supplied any numbers or examples to back up your position.
See my notes below re: saving four steps of energy conversion for
applications where you are able to use air power directly such as nail
guns and die grinders. Four fewer conversion steps *has* to be more
efficient.
quote:
>
>
> But both are less practical than batteries.
Not by a long shot, especially for a large scale installation as a power
utility would use. It is far cheaper and lower maintenance to use a
large air or water reservoir than to use a huge string of batteries with
limited life spans and hazardous lead and acid to dispose of properly at
every battery replacement.
The batteries in your string may last what, perhaps 8 years? A large air
tank that is drained regularly and kept in an area not exposed to
weather should easily last 80 years. When it finally is failing all you
have is scrap steel to dispose of and you can actually get a few dollars
for it.
quote:
>
>
> How big a tank? I think you're going to find a fly in the ointment
> once you run some numbers on air consumption. And if air power could
> be so efficient and practical, why do you believe it is that
> off-gridders, often known to be innovative and unafraid of breaking
> with convention, haven't flocked to the concept?
Perhaps because I haven't seen the concept even proposed in any
alternate energy books. As far as I know CAS and PH are both fairly new
concepts that originated from electric utilities need for a way to store
excess generating capacity during off peak times for use in peak shaving
later.
quote:
>
>
> There's isn't any peak power wasting problem that I'm aware of with
> home power systems, since the cost of generating prevents people from
> buying excess capacity. Can you give an example of the problem you're
> citing?
This would primarily apply to wind generation where peak gusts could
produce power faster than the batteries could accept it, causing that
power to be dissipated by the charge controller.
Hydro could have a similar case where excess capacity could go
uncaptured after heavy rains.
Solar PV is inherently pretty immune from generating peaks.
quote:
>
>
> You left out the AC to DC conversion of the turbine, and assumed that
> energy used must be stored in a battery first. It's true that
> compressed air for tools is a very inefficient process, on-grid or
> off. Yet I've managed quite well with the just the same sort of
> compressor that grid-connected folks use. I could do wind-powered shop
> air more easily than most, but I wouldn't dream of adding another
> system to cure an inefficiency that's such a small part of the big
> picture.
Ok, so five less conversion stages.
It's all relative. The more use your shop has, the more potential
savings. If the shop demand is such that you'll require more generating
capacity, more storage capacity and more inverter capacity then there
may well be cost savings since components for an air system are cheaper.
If you an over-the-top green type, perhaps the ability to eliminate or
keep to an absolute minimum the need for big ol' lead acid hydrogen and
corrosive fume belching batteries might be a positive.
quote:
>
> Coincidentally, I have a neighbor who plans a Bowjon type installation
> (low tower, bulky rotor, single-stage compressor) for shop air using
> multiple surplus storage tanks. I've suggested that since he hasn't
> any wind power at present and could really use some, that the time and
> money he's going to put into the new setup would be better spent on a
> conventional wind genny and a tall tower.
Any reason not to combine both and put up your tall tower with the
electric gen up top and hang a compressor at a lower point on the same
tower?
quote:
>
>
> That's one of those convenience/practicalities tradeoffs. Many
> appliances don't like being de-powered, and it's a nuisance to fight
> it. IMO, biting the bullet for full time capacity is one of those
> things that goes a long way to making off-grid living palatable for
> the average person. After a hard day of pining over the dearth of
> rural ballet, the last thing you want is to have to reprogram the
> clock on the microwave. :-)
True, maximizing efficiency does require active management of the
system. Some things can be automated, and I've even seen a few
microwaves where you can disable the clock though.
quote:
>
>
> The conversion losses are lamentable, but not generally worth working
> around. As Scott mentioned, after you've fought that battle for a
> while, you're ready for straight AC in order to eliminate the
> diddling.
Guess you just need to setup a heat exchanger from your inverter(s) to
capture the waste heat for your DHW.
quote:
>
>
> The fuses definitely couldn't handle it - 400A limit (24V system).
> What kind of *home* welding are you doing that takes 24k Watts input?
Pretty run of the mill stuff actually. The last moderate welding project
was building the CNC router which is framed mostly from 14ga square
steel tubing (http://wpnet.us/cnc_router.htm).
While the welder is rated at 250a and the full output at reduced duty
cycle is 310a, most of the time I'm running in the 150-175a range.
quote:
>
> People can size for whatever they can afford, but if I had the need
> for more indoor stick/TIG, I'd be after one of these
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...tem=7524207277,
> which should be a comfortable fit with our setup. But I find I rarely
> stick weld indoors above about 120A, although I use the Powemig 255 up
> to its max more often. The only really heavy stuff I have to work on
> are the tractors, and that's only occasionally. Since they don't fit
> inside, and neither does the smoke and dust of heavy work, I roll an
> engine-driven unit outdoors.
I primarily use TIG, if for no other reason than I'm most comfortable
with it. I also do aluminum from time to time.
The last time I did stick was a quick repair to my snow blower in the
middle of a storm. Even for that I would have used TIG if I was going to
take the time to do it right vs. just weld through the snow pack. I
won't be doing much of that anymore either since I'm in TX now and don't
get much snow.
quote:
>
>
> The auto-idle feature of a good unit will make that bearable, if the
> tools' idle use is compatible. Still, the generator is going to be
> either idling or roaring in between power tool use, at an average of
> about $2 per hour in fuel. When we first moved onto our site, but
> before we had the power system set up temporarily, I was stuck with
> the welder generator. The running hours add up quickly, and I wouldn't
> recommend it to anyone else except for occasional or temporary use, or
> because there was no alternative, or if it's for a job that pays
> enough to cover the expenses and aggravation.
Any generator is going to be most efficient at or near full rated
output. Load management is always difficult.
quote:
>
>
> Everyone has different needs, wants, and budget, but I think you'll
> find that more and more people have a potential combination of house
> loads that need such capacity that shop use isn't a leap. Around here
> for instance are many who need to power the surge of a 2 hp well pump,
Soft start inverter drive to a three phase well pump with an unloader
valve? 
quote:
> along with other use concurrent. It can be done with a smaller
> inverter and a generator, but it's sure nice to get that generator
> time down if you can. We used to have a couple nearby who had a
> generator/battery/inverter setup, over 10 hours generator time per
> day. That's about 4000 hours and 2000 gallons of fuel per year. I
> think the fuel cost, repair costs, and eventual generator replacement
> cost were big factors in their pulling out after a few years. Even a
> modest amount of PV could have cut that generator time in half, and
> would have been far cheaper in the long run. Better still, the cost of
> that (very nice) generator and fuel could have bought a combination of
> hardware including a much smaller generator needing only a few hours
> per week run time.
The only way to get reasonable efficiency out of a gen/bat/inv setup is
to size the generator to just barely above the average load and run it
24x7, and that requires a pretty specialized generator to handle that
duty. Not something I'd consider unless I had my own nat gas well, or
bio-gas generator.
quote:
>
>
> Not necessarily. Cashing out of a grid-connected place allowed us to
> retire, start with a clean slate, and as the yuppies say, "leverage"
> the advantages of home power to help keep the big picture cost down.
> Cheap land, lower taxes, fewer utilities (still need the phone
> company) are some of the benefits.
Looks like you had to go to some extremes to get your Internet
connectivity. When I was moving to TX I had to base my house choice on
the availability of high speed connectivity. I investigated satellite,
but unfortunately it doesn't work well with VPN. I ended up on cable
which works well.
quote:
>In talking to off-gridders, I find
> that the main factor affecting success isn't so much the power issues,
> but whether the folks can afford and are comfortable with truly rural
> living. For most, that usually means retirement or telecommuting, and
> precludes having children at home. For those who need to commute or be
> close to school busses etc., they're usually stuck with paying the
> premium for grid access. Then again, when they want to generate their
> own power, they can have cheaper and more efficient systems, and use
> the grid for storage.
Well, I telecommute now. Trading a cubicle in a windowless concrete
dungeon for a sunny window office with a purring cat on the windowsill
is a wonderful thing.
Since I'm also single and also quite mechanically and technically
inclined, in theory I could do the off-grid in the middle of nowhere
thing. In the event my job changed and I was no longer able to
telecommute I'd be f'd though.
Unfortunately I don't really expect I'll ever be able to retire. I'm
theoretically making good money these days, at least it looks good on
paper. Unfortunately the economy is such that unless you are a DINK
you're still barely covering living expenses.
Perhaps as I'm able to build up some AE projects I'll be able to cut
operating expenses enough to start to get ahead.
Pete C.
| |
| Arnold Walker 2005-06-17, 11:31 pm |
|
"wmbjk" <wmbjkREMOVE@citlink.net> wrote in message
news:lgk5b1dfa1qt24g0dr9m9vv624q780ljio@4ax.com...
quote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:55:15 GMT, "Pete C." <aux3.DOH.4@snet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
wind driven generator[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Perhaps in some niches... but in any event a practical home power
> setup needs some batteries, and charging them with wind, assuming
> there's wind to harvest, is highly recommended. So you're talking
> about *adding* systems because you believe it's worth the trouble, but
> you haven't supplied any numbers or examples to back up your position.
>
>
> But both are less practical than batteries.
>
>
> How big a tank? I think you're going to find a fly in the ointment
> once you run some numbers on air consumption. And if air power could
> be so efficient and practical, why do you believe it is that
> off-gridders, often known to be innovative and unafraid of breaking
> with convention, haven't flocked to the concept?
Another fly in the oiment on your battery remark.....if batteries are so
much effecient
at storaging .Why are repair shop using air tools instead battery powered
tools.
quote:
>
>
> There's isn't any peak power wasting problem that I'm aware of with
> home power systems, since the cost of generating prevents people from
> buying excess capacity. Can you give an example of the problem you're
> citing?
>
>
> You left out the AC to DC conversion of the turbine, and assumed that
> energy used must be stored in a battery first. It's true that
> compressed air for tools is a very inefficient process, on-grid or
> off. Yet I've managed quite well with the just the same sort of
> compressor that grid-connected folks use. I co | | |