| Author |
"double bent heat exchanger" what is it?
|
|
| phlegmatico@yahoo.com 2005-08-11, 10:21 am |
| as an avid amateur in the patent-searching game, I'm having trouble
locating info about an item I saw in a current Carrier Corporation
brochure... "state of the are high technology double bent heat
exchanger". The tiny picture shows what I would describe as two
parabolic-ish shaped structures, attached to each other open-end to
open-end at top and bottom.
Anyone know what the real name is, in patent literature or in parts
call-out? and what the alleged advantage is?
| |
| B-Hate-Me 2005-08-11, 4:21 pm |
|
<phlegmatico@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123765058.711503.83770@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> as an avid amateur in the patent-searching game, I'm having trouble
> locating info about an item I saw in a current Carrier Corporation
> brochure... "state of the are high technology double bent heat
> exchanger". The tiny picture shows what I would describe as two
> parabolic-ish shaped structures, attached to each other open-end to
> open-end at top and bottom.
>
> Anyone know what the real name is, in patent literature or in parts
> call-out? and what the alleged advantage is?
>
The advantage is that they get to "bent" you over twice !
| |
| Cosmopolite 2005-08-11, 5:21 pm |
| phlegmatico@yahoo.com wrote:
> as an avid amateur in the patent-searching game, I'm having trouble
> locating info about an item I saw in a current Carrier Corporation
> brochure... "state of the are high technology double bent heat
> exchanger". The tiny picture shows what I would describe as two
> parabolic-ish shaped structures, attached to each other open-end to
> open-end at top and bottom.
>
> Anyone know what the real name is, in patent literature or in parts
> call-out? and what the alleged advantage is?
>
Try HVAC groups, but be prepared to get flamed.
| |
| pjm@see_my_sig_for_address.com 2005-08-11, 5:21 pm |
| On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:26:38 GMT, Cosmopolite <anywhere@anywhen.net>
wrote:
>phlegmatico@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
>Try HVAC groups, but be prepared to get flamed.
naaahhhhh........
Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo now available online http://pmilligan.net/palm/
| |
| Cosmopolite 2005-08-11, 7:22 pm |
| pjm@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:26:38 GMT, Cosmopolite <anywhere@anywhen.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> naaahhhhh........
You would know 
>
>
> Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
>
> http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
>
> Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
> 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
> 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
> HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
> Free demo now available online http://pmilligan.net/palm/
| |
| PrecisionMachinisT 2005-08-12, 4:21 am |
|
"Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
news:qQPKe.171316$HI.69529@edtnps84...
> pjm@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote:
>
> You would know
>
Yeah....well....now on the other hand....
I hereby declare open season on your fucking stupid XXX.......
--
SVL
| |
| Telstra 2005-08-12, 6:21 am |
| FUCKED IF I KNOW
<phlegmatico@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123765058.711503.83770@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> as an avid amateur in the patent-searching game, I'm having trouble
> locating info about an item I saw in a current Carrier Corporation
> brochure... "state of the are high technology double bent heat
> exchanger". The tiny picture shows what I would describe as two
> parabolic-ish shaped structures, attached to each other open-end to
> open-end at top and bottom.
>
> Anyone know what the real name is, in patent literature or in parts
> call-out? and what the alleged advantage is?
>
| |
| Cosmopolite 2005-08-12, 11:21 am |
| PrecisionMachinisT wrote:
> "Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
> news:qQPKe.171316$HI.69529@edtnps84...
>
>
>
> Yeah....well....now on the other hand....
>
> I hereby declare open season on your fucking stupid XXX.......
>
> --
>
> SVL
>
>
And the reason is ....?
| |
|
|
"Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
news:ODNKe.130513$wr.11148@clgrps12...
> phlegmatico@yahoo.com wrote:
>
[color=darkred]
> Try HVAC groups, but be prepared to get flamed.
More like insulted for having the audacity to ask a question.
| |
| daestrom 2005-08-12, 5:21 pm |
|
<phlegmatico@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123765058.711503.83770@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> as an avid amateur in the patent-searching game, I'm having trouble
> locating info about an item I saw in a current Carrier Corporation
> brochure... "state of the are high technology double bent heat
> exchanger". The tiny picture shows what I would describe as two
> parabolic-ish shaped structures, attached to each other open-end to
> open-end at top and bottom.
>
> Anyone know what the real name is, in patent literature or in parts
> call-out? and what the alleged advantage is?
>
It's not really anything new/novel. When you have a rotory fan, it is
common pratice to have the air enter into the fan enclosure from one side,
and put the heat exchanger in the air path. To get more air flow in a
system, some folks have long designed the intake to replace *two* sides and
put a heat exchanger in each. When viewed from above, it *looks* like your
heat-exchanger is 'bent' around the corner.
So now we have 'double-bent'. It's just three small heat-exchanger
sections, with the coolant interconnected, and arranged at two angles.
Looked at from the top, it looks like your traditional heat exchanger is
bent in two places instead of one. Hence the phrase, 'double-bent'.
Provides more area for the incoming air to flow through, so the air velocity
is a bit lower and spends more time in the vicinity of the heat exchanger.
No new miricle, just cramming more heat-exchanger into the same box.
daestrom
P.S. Google is your friend...
http://www.pmengineer.com/CDA/Artic...32,6735,00.html
http://www.panasonic.com/consumer_e...ac/pdf/faqs.pdf
| |
| Robert Morien 2005-08-12, 6:21 pm |
| In article <42fcafe4$0$27135$892e7fe2@authen.white.readfreenews.net>,
"News" <Nospam@here.com> wrote:
> "Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
> news:ODNKe.130513$wr.11148@clgrps12...
>
>
> More like insulted for having the audacity to ask a question.
wow, News actually does know what a flame is.
| |
| Oscar_Lives 2005-08-12, 9:21 pm |
|
"Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
news:y12Le.194641$tt5.7432@edtnps90...
> PrecisionMachinisT wrote:
>
> And the reason is ....?
You have demonstrated in these few posts what a stupid dumb motherfucker you
are.
Bombs away!!!
| |
| Oscar_Lives 2005-08-12, 9:21 pm |
|
"daestrom" <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Si7Le.9394$EX.7252@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
> <phlegmatico@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1123765058.711503.83770@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> It's not really anything new/novel. When you have a rotory fan, it is
> common pratice to have the air enter into the fan enclosure from one side,
> and put the heat exchanger in the air path. To get more air flow in a
> system, some folks have long designed the intake to replace *two* sides
> and put a heat exchanger in each. When viewed from above, it *looks* like
> your heat-exchanger is 'bent' around the corner.
>
> So now we have 'double-bent'. It's just three small heat-exchanger
> sections, with the coolant interconnected, and arranged at two angles.
> Looked at from the top, it looks like your traditional heat exchanger is
> bent in two places instead of one. Hence the phrase, 'double-bent'.
>
> Provides more area for the incoming air to flow through, so the air
> velocity is a bit lower and spends more time in the vicinity of the heat
> exchanger. No new miricle, just cramming more heat-exchanger into the same
> box.
>
> daestrom
THAT'S WHAT YOU SAY.
| |
| PrecisionMachinisT 2005-08-12, 10:21 pm |
|
"Oscar_Lives" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:zVaLe.263949$xm3.137235@attbi_s21...
>
> "Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
> news:y12Le.194641$tt5.7432@edtnps90...
>
> You have demonstrated in these few posts what a stupid dumb motherfucker
you
> are.
>
That else something about Google must make it REALLY HARD to figure out
which group(s) one is actually posting to......
> Bombs away!!!
--
SVL
| |
| daestrom 2005-08-13, 10:21 am |
|
"Oscar_Lives" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pWaLe.263953$xm3.7214@attbi_s21...
>
> "daestrom" <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:Si7Le.9394$EX.7252@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>
>
> THAT'S WHAT YOU SAY.
If you took the time to read the links I provided, you'd see that is also
what Panasonic, Carrier, and others say also. Why don't you Google about
them and figure it out for yourself.
daestrom
>
| |
|
| In article <PhD_failure-38CF80.14142112082005@news.isp.giganews.com>,
Robert Morien <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote:
> wow, News actually does know what a flame is.
What's that? "News" actually knows something. NEWSFLASH to the world.
Me
| |
| Cosmopolite 2005-08-13, 10:21 pm |
| Oscar_Lives wrote:
> "Cosmopolite" <anywhere@anywhen.net> wrote in message
> news:y12Le.194641$tt5.7432@edtnps90...
>
>
>
> You have demonstrated in these few posts what a stupid dumb motherfucker you
> are.
>
> Bombs away!!!
Does that mean that you will not help me with info on the Edwards
Speedivac pump that I acquired recently?
|
|
|
|