| andre_54005@yahoo.com 2005-08-25, 12:21 pm |
|
Jim Baber wrote:
> Reason wrote:
>
> Jim disagrees here,
> Biofuels will replace the same amount of carbon when burned as they
> removed from the atmosphere when they were grown. This is what Anthony
> meant by carbon neutral. While, when coal or petrochemicals release
> carbon it is not a replacement, at least not to the same epoch.
>
> This is a case of poor logic by the poster using the pseudonym "Reason",
> he must be taking a vacation from writing G W Bush's speeches.
>
> begin:vcard
> fn:Jim Baber
> n:Baber;Jim
> adr:;;1350 W. Mesa Ave.;Fresno;CA;93711-2008;USA
> email;internet:jim@baber.org
> tel;home 559)435-9068
> tel;cell559)905-2204
> x-mozilla-html:TRUE
> url:http://www.baber.org
> version:2.1
> end:vcard
I get the feeling that "Reason" thinks that if a plant is not burned as
a biofuel then the carbon it removed from the atmosphere somehow does
not get returned when the plant dies and rots on the ground.
__________
Andre' B.
|