| T.Keating 2006-11-19, 9:25 am |
| On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:01:49 -0500, Joe Fischer
<joe@westpointracing.com> wrote:
>On 18 Nov 2006 18:17:10 -0800, "serasian" <gmenator@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> When I stated that it has been cooler than normal the
>last couple of months, I was called a liar by one person, now
>while trying to find today's global average temperature, this
*
You were called a liar for stating a delta temp difference well outside
the best available data for your area. You claimed a specific
measurement of a 10 degree delta not supported by the facts.
Quote: "every day being 10 degrees below normal"..
At most it's been 1 degree below normal.
Scientists have little tolerance for people who repeatedly make claims
not supported by the known facts.
>[Quote]
>"You probably noticed there were fewer Atlantic hurricanes this year.
>Melting Arctic sea ice came extremely close to but didn't break the
>record minimum of summer 2005. And today, the National Oceanic and
>Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, announced two months of
>cooler-than-average temperatures across the United States."
>[Unquote]
>
> appeared in
>
>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2655929
*
What they didn't mention.. that their was significantly less sea ice to
begin with. The remaining ICE is further NORTH (or SOUTH) which makes
it more distance from the primary heat source(equatorial waters).
(I.E. Less delta change .. [melting].. this year, but the overall ice
pack is further north/south respective to each pole)..
Your quote also doesn't mention how much below normal.
Meanwhile one should note: that normal temps are based on 30 year
MOVING averages. When temp is increasing like (GW), the normal temps
have a tendency shift to higher and higher baselines.
Same goes for SST anomalies.. They are also based on MOVING averages.
|