Home > Archive > Alternative Power sources > February 2006 > Interesting new wind turbine...??









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Interesting new wind turbine...??
sno

2006-02-15, 11:21 pm


One KW in 30 MPH wind....53 percent efficient..
almost silent run....

check it out...

http://www.netcomposites.com/news.asp?3152

have fun.....sno

--
Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it

This tag line is generated by:

SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)
Solar Flare

2006-02-15, 11:21 pm

Looks cool! Larger blades capture more power with less
diameter.

"sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message
news:43F3E2B0.D51762D8@opelc.com...
>
> One KW in 30 MPH wind....53 percent efficient..
> almost silent run....
>
> check it out...
>
> http://www.netcomposites.com/news.asp?3152
>
> have fun.....sno
>
> --
> Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it
>
> This tag line is generated by:
>
> SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)



SJC

2006-02-16, 12:21 am

These folks claim to have about 45% and can make it out of concrete.
http://www.thewatt.com/modules.php?...article&sid=938

"sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message news:43F3E2B0.D51762D8@opelc.com...
>
> One KW in 30 MPH wind....53 percent efficient..
> almost silent run....
>
> check it out...
>
> http://www.netcomposites.com/news.asp?3152
>
> have fun.....sno
>
> --
> Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it
>
> This tag line is generated by:
>
> SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)

sno

2006-02-16, 12:21 am


Yep...could all be vaporware....would not go for one of
these....either one...until they are in actual use and
their are some firm numbers....

have fun....sno

SJC wrote:[color=darkred]
>
> These folks claim to have about 45% and can make it out of concrete.
> http://www.thewatt.com/modules.php?...article&sid=938
>
> "sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message news:43F3E2B0.D51762D8@opelc.com...

--
Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it

This tag line is generated by:

SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)
Solar Flare

2006-02-16, 12:21 am

I wonder what they base the efficiency on? The overall
air collection system size or just the turbine size?

"SJC" <sjc_paul_1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:KjSIf.16318$7C3.12284@trnddc08...
> These folks claim to have about 45% and can make it

out of concrete.
>

http://www.thewatt.com/modules.php?...article&sid=938
>
> "sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message

news:43F3E2B0.D51762D8@opelc.com...[color=darkred]
it[color=darkred]


SJC

2006-02-16, 1:21 am


"sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message news:43F3F4C5.8CC016D4@opelc.com...
>
> Yep...could all be vaporware....would not go for one of
> these....either one...until they are in actual use and
> their are some firm numbers....
>
> have fun....sno


I would agree on the concrete one. The patent is pretty broad and as
we know, it does not have to work to get a patent. They are located in
Wyoming and claim to have investers and will have some "real soon now".
>
> SJC wrote:
>
> --
> Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it
>
> This tag line is generated by:
>
> SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)

Uno

2006-02-16, 2:21 am

Has any one seen any public domain wind turbine design? All patented design
won't work for me.


"SJC" <sjc_paul_1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ANTIf.30386$3V4.5773@trnddc06...[color=darkred]
>
> "sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message news:43F3F4C5.8CC016D4@opelc.com...
>
> I would agree on the concrete one. The patent is pretty broad and as
> we know, it does not have to work to get a patent. They are located in
> Wyoming and claim to have investers and will have some "real soon now".


Pal

2006-02-16, 8:21 am

sno wrote:
> One KW in 30 MPH wind....53 percent efficient..
> almost silent run....
>
> check it out...
>
> http://www.netcomposites.com/news.asp?3152
>
> have fun.....sno
>


Reminds me a little of another one I saw on the telly last year...

http://www.turby.nl/
Derek Broughton

2006-02-16, 10:21 am

sno wrote:

>
> One KW in 30 MPH wind....53 percent efficient..
> almost silent run....
>
> check it out...
>
> http://www.netcomposites.com/news.asp?3152
>

6300 Euros!
--
derek
meow2222@care2.com

2006-02-16, 10:21 am

SJC wrote:
> These folks claim to have about 45% and can make it out of concrete.
> http://www.thewatt.com/modules.php?...article&sid=938


bad link :/

NT

wmbjk

2006-02-16, 11:21 am

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:10:35 +0930, "Solar Flare"
<sfl@hutmail.notvalid> wrote:

>"sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message
>news:43F3E2B0.D51762D8@opelc.com...
[color=darkred]
>Looks cool!


It only looks good to you because you don't know what you're talking
about.

> Larger blades capture more power with less
>diameter


<sigh>

A conventional turbine that produces 1kW at a "normal" wind speed
rating (generally considered about 25 mph max), needs 10' of rotor
diameter.

This new design claims a useful increase in efficiency, but an 88%
smaller wind capture area. To put their output claim in perspective,
consider that the similarly sized Air 403 produces less than half the
output at a similar high wind speed. And that high wind speed is
achievable for few, and then only occasionally. The topper is the 6300
Euro price, which is insane. A real, proven, buy anytime 1kW turbine
costs about $2k, more than 10 times less per real Whr than the new
"cool" design.

There have been a number of these small diameter miracles over the
years. The "windtree" comes to mind...
http://www.wind-works.org/articles/sm_windtree.html
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory...enews020118.htm

And just in case I haven't reminded you lately, you're an idiot.

Wayne
wmbjk

2006-02-16, 11:21 am

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:01:28 GMT, "Uno" <Uno@max.com> wrote:

>Has any one seen any public domain wind turbine design? All patented design
>won't work for me.


http://otherpower.com/

Wayne
Steve Spence

2006-02-16, 1:21 pm

Uno wrote:
> Has any one seen any public domain wind turbine design? All patented design
> won't work for me.
>
>


http://www.otherpower.com



--
Steve Spence
Dir., Green Trust, http://www.green-trust.org
Contributing Editor, http://www.off-grid.net
http://www.rebelwolf.com/essn.html
Don Kelly

2006-02-17, 1:21 am

----------------------------
"Solar Flare" <sfl@hutmail.notvalid> wrote in message
news:6t-dnfcHk9qCcG7enZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@golden.net...
> Looks cool! Larger blades capture more power with less
> diameter.
>
> "sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message
> news:43F3E2B0.D51762D8@opelc.com...
------------------
1kW in a 14m/s wind - that is about a 50km/hour (or 30 mph) wind- somewhat
higher than average. What will it produce in a more likely 10km/h wind?
--

Don Kelly @shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer
[color=darkred]
>
>



sno

2006-02-17, 3:21 am



Don Kelly wrote:
>
> ----------------------------
> "Solar Flare" <sfl@hutmail.notvalid> wrote in message
> news:6t-dnfcHk9qCcG7enZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@golden.net...
> ------------------
> 1kW in a 14m/s wind - that is about a 50km/hour (or 30 mph) wind- somewhat
> higher than average. What will it produce in a more likely 10km/h wind?
> --


Found a web page for them.....has wind/power graph....

http://www.windwandler.de/eng/perf1.html

sno
>
> Don Kelly @shawcross.ca
> remove the X to answer

Don Kelly

2006-02-19, 12:21 am


"sno" <sno@opelc.com> wrote in message news:43F57619.6129A2F3@opelc.com...
>
>
> Don Kelly wrote:
>
> Found a web page for them.....has wind/power graph....
>
> http://www.windwandler.de/eng/perf1.html
>
> sno

-----------

Thank you- about as expected. Not particularly impressive.

--

Don Kelly @shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer
----------------------------


LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com