Home > Archive > Alternative Power sources > March 2007 > Re: Flywheels Not Common? (correction)









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Flywheels Not Common? (correction)
sno

2007-03-09, 9:25 pm


Sorry....wrong link on my last reply...

yep.....here is a pretty good overview...

http://zebu.uoregon.edu/1996/ph162/l10a.html

have fun.....sno

Anonymous wrote:
>
> Can the flywheel be made thicker so that the speed of rotation can be made
> safely low enough? 18 inches in diameter and 10 feet high? Or something
> like that?


--
No matter how dangerous nuclear power may or
may not be.....
Is it any more dangerous then what we are doing
now.....???
Nuclear power is the only proven technology that
can solve our energy problems.....

This tag line is generated by:
SLTG (Silly Little Tag Generator)
LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com