|
Home > Archive > Alternative Power sources > March 2007 > HERE IS A PROOF, CO2 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE HEAT
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
HERE IS A PROOF, CO2 HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE HEAT
|
|
| Niel Humphreys 2007-03-12, 1:25 pm |
| 1.) Close your garage tight, and make sure there is no big hole of air
coming into your garage.
2.) Go out there driving your car for 2-3 hours, bring your car home into
your garage and turn off your ignition, close the garage tight. Measure the
air temperature quickly. Write it down.
3.) Wait 1/2 hours, come back and measure your garage air temperature again.
You will see the heat comes up on your meter. You can even feel the heat
yourself in the air.
So where the heat come from when CO2 is not present?
What actually trapping the heat? (Your garage since it's a high density
chemical structure.)
---------------------------
This proves that CO2 was not produced in your garage, the heat of your car
dominates the air in your garage. Why? because the 99% of OXYGEN & NITROGEN
contact the metal frame of your car engine. Their electrons got vibrated,
this cause a chain of reaction. Their electrons spin much faster that
usual, they bump each other and up they go into the air.
---------------------------
The CO2 is so far less than 1%
It is even less than 0.1%. Ask any chemists who really understand.
| |
| Solar Flare 2007-03-12, 5:25 pm |
| WOW! I didn't know that global warming and garage warming were the
same thing.
Is carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide the same thing too? They both
smell the same.
I think all things that start with the same letters are really the
same thing. Nitrous oxide and nitrogen are the same thing. I am
brething some right now.
Have to go...I feel sleepy and silly.....lpvms giopjgm
xkl
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote
in message news:jwfJh.9092$PL.5102@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> 1.) Close your garage tight, and make sure there is no big hole of
> air
> coming into your garage.
>
> 2.) Go out there driving your car for 2-3 hours, bring your car home
> into
> your garage and turn off your ignition, close the garage tight.
> Measure the
> air temperature quickly. Write it down.
>
> 3.) Wait 1/2 hours, come back and measure your garage air
> temperature again.
> You will see the heat comes up on your meter. You can even feel the
> heat
> yourself in the air.
>
> So where the heat come from when CO2 is not present?
>
> What actually trapping the heat? (Your garage since it's a high
> density
> chemical structure.)
>
> ---------------------------
>
> This proves that CO2 was not produced in your garage, the heat of
> your car
> dominates the air in your garage. Why? because the 99% of OXYGEN &
> NITROGEN
> contact the metal frame of your car engine. Their electrons got
> vibrated,
> this cause a chain of reaction. Their electrons spin much faster
> that
> usual, they bump each other and up they go into the air.
>
> ---------------------------
>
> The CO2 is so far less than 1%
>
> It is even less than 0.1%. Ask any chemists who really understand.
>
>
| |
| Niel Humphreys 2007-03-12, 5:25 pm |
|
"Solar Flare" <solaerfart@hootmail.invalidated> wrote in message
news:A_udnSmnE8z-XWjYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@golden.net...
> WOW! I didn't know that global warming and garage warming were the
> same thing.
What melt the ice? Isn't that the heat that they're claiming? They claimed
CO2 trapped the heat (that BS). Their scientists can't explain how the
trapping works. The Green House effect is a poor example, because they
ignore the shelter of the green house, that what trapped the heat.
I am trying to show you that CO2 cannot trap the heat. A garage example is
to show you that Only High Density Chemical structure like the frame of your
house can trap the heat, a plastic sheet is a high density, it too can trap
the heat. CO2 is so little in amosphere, less than 0.5% in relation with
Oxigen (21%) and Nitrogen (78%).
> Is carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide the same thing too? They both
> smell the same.
>
CO2 and CO are not the same!!
Some chemical structures with the same contents are still not the same when
the angle of bonding are in mirror or opposite angle.
| |
| Solar Flare 2007-03-12, 5:25 pm |
| What good are this? We got had went down up with more. Some of all it
did.
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote
in message
news:bLjJh.12090$Jl.3524@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Solar Flare" <solaerfart@hootmail.invalidated> wrote in message
> news:A_udnSmnE8z-XWjYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@golden.net...
>
>
> What melt the ice? Isn't that the heat that they're claiming? They
> claimed
> CO2 trapped the heat (that BS). Their scientists can't explain how
> the
> trapping works. The Green House effect is a poor example, because
> they
> ignore the shelter of the green house, that what trapped the heat.
>
> I am trying to show you that CO2 cannot trap the heat. A garage
> example is
> to show you that Only High Density Chemical structure like the frame
> of your
> house can trap the heat, a plastic sheet is a high density, it too
> can trap
> the heat. CO2 is so little in amosphere, less than 0.5% in
> relation with
> Oxigen (21%) and Nitrogen (78%).
>
>
>
>
> CO2 and CO are not the same!!
>
> Some chemical structures with the same contents are still not the
> same when
> the angle of bonding are in mirror or opposite angle.
>
>
>
>
| |
| daestrom 2007-03-12, 5:25 pm |
|
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in
message news:jwfJh.9092$PL.5102@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> 1.) Close your garage tight, and make sure there is no big hole of air
> coming into your garage.
>
> 2.) Go out there driving your car for 2-3 hours, bring your car home into
> your garage and turn off your ignition, close the garage tight. Measure
> the
> air temperature quickly. Write it down.
>
> 3.) Wait 1/2 hours, come back and measure your garage air temperature
> again.
> You will see the heat comes up on your meter. You can even feel the heat
> yourself in the air.
>
> So where the heat come from when CO2 is not present?
>
> What actually trapping the heat? (Your garage since it's a high density
> chemical structure.)
>
Nobody in the scientific community claims that CO2 *creates* heat. Just
your sad misunderstanding of the issue.
CO2 changes the rate that radiant energy in the infrared wavelengths can
leave the planet. To understand this, you have to understand radiant heat
transfer and what determines the overall average temperature of a body (such
as a planet) in outer space near a star. Something that apparently is
beyond your understanding.
A hot solid object such as a car engine, in direct contact with air
transfers much of its heat by conduction and convection, not radiation
(unless it is very hot). But a body in outer space does not lose heat by
conduction or convection, there is no 'air' out there. It can only lose
heat by radiation. And for infrared radiation to leave the planet, it must
travel through the atmosphere. Oxygen and nitrogen are transparent to this
form of radiation, so it has little impact on the rate of radiant heat
transfer. CO2 however is not transparent, so any increase in CO2 levels
changes the rate at which infrared radiation carries heat away from the
surface.
You've posted nonsense similar to this before, yet you persist in claiming
your 'proof' as some great scientific treatise. But instead, your ramblings
show just how ignorant you are of the issue.
You obviously have the critical thinking skills of a four year old. Why
don't you study some science before posting such dribble. Especially when
you 'shout' about 'PROOF', when you don't even understand the problem.
daestrom
| |
| Niel Humphreys 2007-03-12, 8:25 pm |
|
Daestrom,
Can you today double the power of your car Mr. Genius? using regular gas?
Can you eliminate the heat of your car Mr.. genius? by making it runs below
30 degree? instead of 450 - 1000 degrees?
You know how to play the games of word don't you? using fancy word like
"outer space,etc" What a fucktard you are, using fear to get people to pay
you big $$$$ for your Solar panel or Wind Power hug? You're the stupid
idiot. In the end, you will kill yourself and your family.
Word is cheap! It's the Action that counts.
"daestrom" <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45f5cdf4$0$24721$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
> "Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:jwfJh.9092$PL.5102@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> Nobody in the scientific community claims that CO2 *creates* heat. Just
> your sad misunderstanding of the issue.
>
> CO2 changes the rate that radiant energy in the infrared wavelengths can
> leave the planet. To understand this, you have to understand radiant heat
> transfer and what determines the overall average temperature of a body
> (such
> as a planet) in outer space near a star. Something that apparently is
> beyond your understanding.
>
> A hot solid object such as a car engine, in direct contact with air
> transfers much of its heat by conduction and convection, not radiation
> (unless it is very hot). But a body in outer space does not lose heat by
> conduction or convection, there is no 'air' out there. It can only lose
> heat by radiation. And for infrared radiation to leave the planet, it
> must
> travel through the atmosphere. Oxygen and nitrogen are transparent to
> this
> form of radiation, so it has little impact on the rate of radiant heat
> transfer. CO2 however is not transparent, so any increase in CO2 levels
> changes the rate at which infrared radiation carries heat away from the
> surface.
>
> You've posted nonsense similar to this before, yet you persist in claiming
> your 'proof' as some great scientific treatise. But instead, your
> ramblings
> show just how ignorant you are of the issue.
>
> You obviously have the critical thinking skills of a four year old. Why
> don't you study some science before posting such dribble. Especially when
> you 'shout' about 'PROOF', when you don't even understand the problem.
>
> daestrom
>
| |
| somebody@somewhere.com 2007-03-12, 8:25 pm |
| On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:03:35 -0400, "daestrom"
<daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote:
>Nobody in the scientific community claims that CO2 *creates* heat. Just
>your sad misunderstanding of the issue.
Troll alert
| |
| Richard P. 2007-03-14, 3:25 am |
| Blow hard....
Where would you be without the internet..? Probably standing on a street
corner with a sandwich board.
| |
| daestrom 2007-03-14, 5:25 pm |
|
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztezrzsz.co.uk> wrote in
message news:mukJh.12023$tD2.5766@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> Daestrom,
>
> Can you today double the power of your car Mr. Genius? using regular gas?
>
> Can you eliminate the heat of your car Mr.. genius? by making it runs
> below
> 30 degree? instead of 450 - 1000 degrees?
>
Neither of which has anything to do with your erroneous statements about
cars, garages, CO2 and the greenhouse effect. Just proves you suffer from
ADHD or something, you can't seem to stick to the original post (that you
made).
PLONK
daestrom
| |
| daestrom 2007-03-14, 5:25 pm |
|
<somebody@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:34rbv2d7bd38m4pg2aa8a9cc83st71o8f1@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:03:35 -0400, "daestrom"
> <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> Troll alert
>
Definitely :-)
| |
| somebody@somewhere.com 2007-03-14, 8:25 pm |
| On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:09:01 -0400, "daestrom"
<daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote:
>
><somebody@somewhere.com> wrote in message
>news:34rbv2d7bd38m4pg2aa8a9cc83st71o8f1@4ax.com...
>Definitely :-)
>
However,
<http://apnews.myway.com//article/20.../D8NRI2C80.html>
Too funny, in a sad way. Here's to you Mrs. Robinson.
| |
| Solar Flare 2007-03-15, 3:25 am |
| #71 and counting...
"daestrom" <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45f8721e$0$16994$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Neither of which has anything to do with your erroneous statements
> about cars, garages, CO2 and the greenhouse effect. Just proves you
> suffer from ADHD or something, you can't seem to stick to the
> original post (that you made).
>
> PLONK
>
> daestrom
>
>
|
|
|
|
|