Home > Archive > Home Cleaning > June 2006 > Cleaning rubber buttons from a remote









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Cleaning rubber buttons from a remote
derekantosh@shaw.ca

2006-05-18, 1:21 pm

Hello all!
I recently purchased a used univeral remote control (off ebay) that
unfortunately was in a smoking home. The thing stinks of smoke, and the
buttons themselves (which are made of rubber) are actually stained
yellow (they used to be white) from the smoke. I took the remote apart
and found that the rubber button "sheet" was really the only thing that
the smoke had affected. I took the rubber button sheet and put it in a
ziplock bag with baking soda to remove the smell. It worked perfectly,
and the button sheet no longer stinks of smoke. I am wondering what I
could use to remove the yellow staining of the buttons? They do have
labels painted on some of them, so I don't think bleach would be the
best bet. Any ideas?
Thanks!

Nan

2006-05-18, 3:21 pm

On 18 May 2006 09:04:36 -0700, derekantosh@shaw.ca wrote:

>Hello all!
>I recently purchased a used univeral remote control (off ebay) that
>unfortunately was in a smoking home. The thing stinks of smoke, and the
>buttons themselves (which are made of rubber) are actually stained
>yellow (they used to be white) from the smoke. I took the remote apart
>and found that the rubber button "sheet" was really the only thing that
>the smoke had affected. I took the rubber button sheet and put it in a
>ziplock bag with baking soda to remove the smell. It worked perfectly,
>and the button sheet no longer stinks of smoke. I am wondering what I
>could use to remove the yellow staining of the buttons? They do have
>labels painted on some of them, so I don't think bleach would be the
>best bet. Any ideas?
>Thanks!


I suppose you could try soaking it in water and dish liquid solution,
but I'm thinking I'd just spend 7.88 at walmart and get a brand new
one, myself.

Nan

derekantosh@shaw.ca

2006-05-18, 4:21 pm

Unfortunately this is a Logitech Harmony remote (~$150), so I was
hoping to be able to use this one instead of having to purchase another
one.

smithfarms pure kona

2006-05-18, 5:21 pm

On 18 May 2006 11:46:02 -0700, derekantosh@shaw.ca wrote:

>Unfortunately this is a Logitech Harmony remote (~$150), so I was
>hoping to be able to use this one instead of having to purchase

another
>one.


Why not use rubbing alcohol? Or one of those Clorox Wipes that do not
contain bleach despite the Clorox name? I clean my keyboard, the
telephone, our cheap remote etc. with both of those things. Isopropyl
alcohol is so cheap, you might want to try that.

aloha,
Thunder
smithfarms.com
Farmers of pure Kona Coffee

Mrs Bonk

2006-05-30, 7:21 am

derekantosh@shaw.ca wrote:
> Unfortunately this is a Logitech Harmony remote (~$150), so I was
> hoping to be able to use this one instead of having to purchase another
> one.


I suppose the days of getting out of the chair and switching over are long
gone. I bought a universal remote control that tunes in to any TV all by
itself and it was about a fiver, it does TV, text, video, satellite,cable
and makes coffee.
Unfortunately I no longer possess a TV and only drink tea.
It always pays when purchasing on Ebay to look for the "Comes from a no
smoking home" title, unless of course one is not concerned about items
dripping in nicotine.


Phisherman

2006-05-30, 10:21 pm

On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:06:43 +0100, "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com>
wrote:

>derekantosh@shaw.ca wrote:
>
>I suppose the days of getting out of the chair and switching over are long
>gone. I bought a universal remote control that tunes in to any TV all by
>itself and it was about a fiver, it does TV, text, video, satellite,cable
>and makes coffee.
>Unfortunately I no longer possess a TV and only drink tea.
>It always pays when purchasing on Ebay to look for the "Comes from a no
>smoking home" title, unless of course one is not concerned about items
>dripping in nicotine.
>



I didn't have TV until my sister arrived with a vintage TV 2 years
ago. I've since added a 7.1 channel audio system and soon will have a
50" plasma TV remote to add to VCR, DVD carousel, and amplifier
remotes. I don't clean any of the buttons with any solvents in fear
of removing key labels or damaging the remote electronics. One swipe
with the upholstery attachment removes any bits of dust or debris. I
keep my remotes in a drawer to keep them clean & protected. For those
really wondering what kind of solvent to use on rubber without harming
the rubber is the use of wood alcohol. Methanol (wood alcohol) is a
serious health hazard, inhalation or skin contact. Ethanol
(moonshine) can clean rubber too but it can deteriorate rubber.
Nan

2006-05-31, 9:21 am

On Wed, 31 May 2006 00:55:47 GMT, Phisherman <noone@nobody.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:06:43 +0100, "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>I didn't have TV until my sister arrived with a vintage TV 2 years
>ago. I've since added a 7.1 channel audio system and soon will have a
>50" plasma TV remote to add to VCR, DVD carousel, and amplifier
>remotes. I don't clean any of the buttons with any solvents in fear
>of removing key labels or damaging the remote electronics. One swipe
>with the upholstery attachment removes any bits of dust or debris. I
>keep my remotes in a drawer to keep them clean & protected. For those
>really wondering what kind of solvent to use on rubber without harming
>the rubber is the use of wood alcohol. Methanol (wood alcohol) is a
>serious health hazard, inhalation or skin contact. Ethanol
>(moonshine) can clean rubber too but it can deteriorate rubber.


Why Phish, you're moving up in the world :-)
I use a baby wipe to clean our remote. I can wrap it around my
fingernail and get between the buttons pretty well. I figure if it's
okay for my darling's bum, it's okay for the remote <G>

Nan

0tterbot

2006-06-01, 6:21 am

"Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com> wrote in message
news:4e2jpmF1d2eabU1@individual.net...
> derekantosh@shaw.ca wrote:
>
> I suppose the days of getting out of the chair and switching over are long
> gone.


one horrific element about certain televisions etc (e.g. mine) is that some
functions don't work EXCEPT via the remote! it's horrible! i never wanted a
remote control telly but we inherited this one for free, so there's that.
but, we have to have the remote to go with it, or some things won't work.
(our dvd player is teh same, except worse).

I bought a universal remote control that tunes in to any TV all by
> itself and it was about a fiver, it does TV, text, video, satellite,cable
> and makes coffee.
> Unfortunately I no longer possess a TV and only drink tea.
> It always pays when purchasing on Ebay to look for the "Comes from a no
> smoking home" title, unless of course one is not concerned about items
> dripping in nicotine.


that yellow stuff is mostly tar, not nicotine :-) i know everyone thinks
it's nicotine, but it isn't. and ciggies aren't bad for us because of
nicotine, either - nicotine (in controlled amounts) is no worse for you than
caffeine in controlled amounts.

mind you, all that is another story.
klyie


lucy

2006-06-01, 2:21 pm


"0tterbot" <spl@t.com> wrote in message
news:vRxfg.1520$ap3.333@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com> wrote in message
> news:4e2jpmF1d2eabU1@individual.net...
>
> one horrific element about certain televisions etc (e.g. mine) is that
> some functions don't work EXCEPT via the remote! it's horrible! i never
> wanted a remote control telly but we inherited this one for free, so
> there's that. but, we have to have the remote to go with it, or some
> things won't work. (our dvd player is teh same, except worse).
>
> I bought a universal remote control that tunes in to any TV all by
>
> that yellow stuff is mostly tar, not nicotine :-) i know everyone thinks
> it's nicotine, but it isn't. and ciggies aren't bad for us because of
> nicotine, either - nicotine (in controlled amounts) is no worse for you
> than caffeine in controlled amounts.
>
> mind you, all that is another story.
> klyie


I agree with the clorox wipe to clean the stains, it works on keyboards, and
might on the remote.
We don't smoke either, and we don't watch tv that often, so what I do is
store the remotes upside down (button side down) and then dust just settles
on the back, not on the buttons.
And yes, I do dust, but I live in Texas :-)
lucy


Mrs Bonk

2006-06-03, 3:21 pm

0tterbot wrote:
> "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com> wrote in message
> news:4e2jpmF1d2eabU1@individual.net...
>
> one horrific element about certain televisions etc (e.g. mine) is that
> some functions don't work EXCEPT via the remote! it's horrible! i never
> wanted a remote control telly but we inherited this one for free, so
> there's that. but, we have to have the remote to go with it, or some
> things won't work. (our dvd player is teh same, except worse).
>
> I bought a universal remote control that tunes in to any TV all by
>
> that yellow stuff is mostly tar, not nicotine :-) i know everyone thinks
> it's nicotine, but it isn't. and ciggies aren't bad for us because of
> nicotine, either - nicotine (in controlled amounts) is no worse for you
> than caffeine in controlled amounts.
>
> mind you, all that is another story.
> klyie


what a strange way to look at things. Nicotine is deadly and addictive and
as it's readily available in cigarettes then IMO it cannot be good for us
and caffeine is not good for us either. I have never been a coffee addict
but I am ashamed to say I have been called fag ash lil more than once but
not any more, those days are long gone.


0tterbot

2006-06-03, 10:21 pm

"Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com> wrote in message
news:4ee24jF1dn684U1@individual.net...

>
> what a strange way to look at things. Nicotine is deadly and addictive and
> as it's readily available in cigarettes then IMO it cannot be good for us
> and caffeine is not good for us either. I have never been a coffee addict
> but I am ashamed to say I have been called fag ash lil more than once but
> not any more, those days are long gone.


oh well <shrug>. not strange, just the way it is :-) controlled (and small)
amounts of nicotine give your brain a boost. so does caffeine. neither is
good in larger or uncontrolled amounts, but there you have it :-) they're
not the only two chemicals which stimulate the brain in small quantities but
are poisonous in larger quantities; many chemicals are like that.

with the cigs, it's not the nicotine which kills you (the tar & carcinogens
do that) - it's only the nicotine that keeps you coming back for more, it's
the addictive element, but not the main dangerous element.
:-)
klyie


aspasia

2006-06-24, 5:25 pm

On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 19:18:54 +0100, "Mrs Bonk" <arse@cuteyspamout.com>
wrote:

>0tterbot wrote:
>
>what a strange way to look at things. Nicotine is deadly and addictive and
>as it's readily available in cigarettes then IMO it cannot be good for us
>and caffeine is not good for us either. I have never been a coffee addict
>but I am ashamed to say I have been called fag ash lil more than once but
>not any more, those days are long gone.
>

There are several hundred other dangerous chemicals in tobacco.
If I can find the list, I'll post the URL.

Never smoked
LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com