|
Home > Archive > Building and Construction > March 2006 > Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Video of THERMITE REACTION at WTC on 9/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Matt Barrow 2006-03-11, 4:21 pm |
|
"P. Fritz" <paulfritzREMOVEME@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:1215tta1nfb1bc6@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "RicodJour" <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote in message
> news:1142051988.798964.199400@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt....47a20e9b3d164b0
>
>
> http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part...pse%20Final.pdf
>
>
Trying to reason with irrational (unreasonable) people is exactly like
trying to reason with your dog or cat.
Trying to convince the modernist/post-modernists is futile as the reject
every facet of evidence/process/logic that western culture is built (no pun
intended) on.
| |
| Hornblatt 2006-03-11, 9:21 pm |
| Another view..
http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf#search='thermite%20reaction%20aluminum%20iron%20wtc'
(If you have ever peeled spandrel off of a 3 decade old building
almost anywhere in the world, you would would see a tremendous amount
of rust. There is so much in places, it clumps in foamy blobs, in
particular at seams and rivet joints. In this case, the building
spandrel is, you guessed it, Aluminum... oh, the planes were aluminum
as well)..
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:02:53 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
<matt.barrow@sitefill.com> wrote:
>
>"P. Fritz" <paulfritzREMOVEME@voyager.net> wrote in message
>news:1215tta1nfb1bc6@corp.supernews.com...
>Trying to reason with irrational (unreasonable) people is exactly like
>trying to reason with your dog or cat.
>
>Trying to convince the modernist/post-modernists is futile as the reject
>every facet of evidence/process/logic that western culture is built (no pun
>intended) on.
>
| |
| TRUTH 2006-03-11, 10:21 pm |
| what caused steel members to partially evaporate? It wasn't burning jet
fuel.
Hornblatt <nebalspal@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:0vs612p7lqok8hqmnfaoe8bvf48mktnilq@4ax.com:
> Another view..
>
> http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf#search='thermite%20reaction%20alum
> inum%20iron%20wtc'
>
> (If you have ever peeled spandrel off of a 3 decade old building
> almost anywhere in the world, you would would see a tremendous amount
> of rust. There is so much in places, it clumps in foamy blobs, in
> particular at seams and rivet joints. In this case, the building
> spandrel is, you guessed it, Aluminum... oh, the planes were aluminum
> as well)..
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:02:53 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
> <matt.barrow@sitefill.com> wrote:
>
>
| |
| Matt Barrow 2006-03-11, 10:21 pm |
|
"Hornblatt" <nebalspal@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0vs612p7lqok8hqmnfaoe8bvf48mktnilq@4ax.com...
> Another view..
>
> http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf#search='thermite%20reaction%20aluminum%20iron%20wtc'
>
> (If you have ever peeled spandrel off of a 3 decade old building
> almost anywhere in the world, you would would see a tremendous amount
> of rust. There is so much in places, it clumps in foamy blobs, in
> particular at seams and rivet joints. In this case, the building
> spandrel is, you guessed it, Aluminum... oh, the planes were aluminum
> as well)..
>
This is relevant...how?
| |
| Wake UP! 2006-03-11, 10:21 pm |
| excerpt from Dr Jones paper:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Dramatic footage reveals yellow-to-white hot molten metal dripping from the
South WTC Tower shortly before its collapse:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...254740145858863
&q=cameraplanet+9%2F11. The yellow color implies a molten-metal
temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the dark-
smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If aluminum (e.g.,
from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat
source at its melting point of about 650 oC and thus would not reach the
yellow color observed for this molten metal. Thus, molten aluminum is in
fact ruled out with high probability. But molten iron with the
characteristics seen in this video is consistent with a thermite-reaction
attacking the steel columns in the Tower, thus weakening the building just
prior to its collapse, since thermite produces molten iron at yellow-to-
white hot temperatures. (As some of the molten metal hits the side of the
building in the video clip above, note that the white-hot interior is
exposed.) The reader may wish to compare the dripping molten metal
observed on the corner of the South Tower just before its collapse with the
dripping molten metal from known thermite reactions:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite2.htm
| |
| Hornblatt 2006-03-11, 11:21 pm |
| Yes, the reader agrees. It's precisely what CAUSED the reaction that
is the content of the posted link. I never said the thermite reaction
didn't happen, it's just how it could have happened that is in the
text.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:01:31 GMT, "Wake UP!" <WU@nospam.com> wrote:
>excerpt from Dr Jones paper:
>http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
>
>
>Dramatic footage reveals yellow-to-white hot molten metal dripping from the
>South WTC Tower shortly before its collapse:
>http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...254740145858863
>&q=cameraplanet+9%2F11. The yellow color implies a molten-metal
>temperature of approximately 1000 oC, evidently above that which the dark-
>smoke hydrocarbon fires in the Towers could produce. If aluminum (e.g.,
>from the plane) had melted, it would melt and flow away from the heat
>source at its melting point of about 650 oC and thus would not reach the
>yellow color observed for this molten metal. Thus, molten aluminum is in
>fact ruled out with high probability. But molten iron with the
>characteristics seen in this video is consistent with a thermite-reaction
>attacking the steel columns in the Tower, thus weakening the building just
>prior to its collapse, since thermite produces molten iron at yellow-to-
>white hot temperatures. (As some of the molten metal hits the side of the
>building in the video clip above, note that the white-hot interior is
>exposed.) The reader may wish to compare the dripping molten metal
>observed on the corner of the South Tower just before its collapse with the
>dripping molten metal from known thermite reactions:
>http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Thermite2.htm
| |
| domecrawler 2006-03-13, 12:21 am |
| Ya. It's a thermite reaction alright. Burning sugar is enough to start
the reaction and everything was there. So what is the conspiracy? yes,
the reaction is enough to melt a column..
Hornblatt wrote:[color=darkred]
> Yes, the reader agrees. It's precisely what CAUSED the reaction that
> is the content of the posted link. I never said the thermite reaction
> didn't happen, it's just how it could have happened that is in the
> text.
>
>
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:01:31 GMT, "Wake UP!" <WU@nospam.com> wrote:
>
| |
| indago 2006-03-15, 10:21 am |
| 060311 1502 - Matt Barrow posted:
>
> "P. Fritz" <paulfritzREMOVEME@voyager.net> wrote in message
> news:1215tta1nfb1bc6@corp.supernews.com...
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC%20Part...lapse%20Final.p
d>> f[color=darkred]
> Trying to reason with irrational (unreasonable) people is exactly like
> trying to reason with your dog or cat.
>
> Trying to convince the modernist/post-modernists is futile as the reject
> every facet of evidence/process/logic that western culture is built (no pun
> intended) on.
>
>
Watch this typical conspiracy theorist as he pecks out his vitriol on his
keyboard...
http://x1.putfile.com/10/27415232922.gif
| |
|
|
|
|
|