| Author |
9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
|
|
|
|
| SHOOTER586 2007-02-21, 1:25 pm |
| On Feb 20, 11:15 pm, "T_R_U_T_H" <T...@nospam.com> wrote:
> http://www.911researchers.com/node/241
Yep, you can see where they inserted cartoons of Bugs Bunny and the
Road Runner just before the plane impacts.
Still wondering why these "no-planers" can't find a single "insider"
to be able to prove it was even possible?
I guess it is easier to claim space beams and cartoons, than explain
reality.
| |
| Matt Barrow 2007-02-22, 9:25 am |
| "SHOOTER586" <shooter586@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172077232.975480.205860@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 20, 11:15 pm, "T_R_U_T_H" <T...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> I guess it is easier to claim space beams and cartoons, than explain
> reality.
A better explanation is that they left the door unlocked at the "Funny Farm"
again.
| |
| Freedom Fighter 2007-02-22, 5:25 pm |
| "Matt Barrow" <matt_barrow@sitefill.com> wrote in message
news:z6hDh.2837$3W4.2053@newsfe21.lga...
> "SHOOTER586" <shooter586@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1172077232.975480.205860@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>
> A better explanation is that they left the door unlocked at the "Funny
> Farm" again.
These trolls and shills have no facts to back up their defense of America's
mass-murdering fascists, so hating the truth, or unable to confront it, all
they can do is attack those that expose it.
Ad-hominem attack is the refuge of unintelligent and immature people that
can't refute an opinion with logic or facts, so they resort to childishly
attacking the person that holds the opinion.
Pathetic.
| |
| Matt Barrow 2007-02-22, 8:25 pm |
| "Freedom Fighter" <liberty@once.net> wrote in message
news:gcpDh.4403$as2.2394@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> These trolls and shills have no facts to back up their defense of
> America's mass-murdering fascists, so hating the truth, or unable to
> confront it, all they can do is attack those that expose it.
>
> Ad-hominem attack is the refuge of unintelligent and immature people that
> can't refute an opinion with logic or facts, so they resort to childishly
> attacking the person that holds the opinion.
Reasoning (use of facts with integrative logic) with folks such as you is
like reasoning with my dog. Only she understands more than you.
>
> Pathetic.
Yes, you are. Sick too.
Life isn't a game that you wish to make it into.
| |
| Deputy Dumbya Dawg 2007-02-23, 9:25 am |
|
"Matt Barrow" <matt_barrow@sitefill.com> wrote in
message news:dTpDh.181317$IL1.178677@newsfe13.lga...
: "Freedom Fighter" <liberty@once.net> wrote in message
:
news:gcpDh.4403$as2.2394@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
: >>>
: >>> I guess it is easier to claim space beams and
cartoons, than explain
: >>> reality.
: >>
: >> A better explanation is that they left the door
unlocked at the "Funny
: >> Farm" again.
: >
: > These trolls and shills have no facts to back up
their defense of
: > America's mass-murdering fascists, so hating the
truth, or unable to
: > confront it, all they can do is attack those that
expose it.
: >
: > Ad-hominem attack is the refuge of unintelligent
and immature people that
: > can't refute an opinion with logic or facts, so
they resort to childishly
: > attacking the person that holds the opinion.
:
: Reasoning (use of facts with integrative logic) with
folks such as you is
: like reasoning with my dog. Only she understands more
than you.
:
You proved his point exactly rightard.
peace
dawg
| |
| Matt Barrow 2007-02-23, 1:25 pm |
| "Deputy Dumbya Dawg" <Depputyy_Dumbyaa_Daawg@whiteehouuse.gov> wrote in
message news:m9CDh.5556$tD2.1605@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Matt Barrow" <matt_barrow@sitefill.com> wrote in
> : Reasoning (use of facts with integrative logic) with
> folks such as you is
> : like reasoning with my dog. Only she understands more
> than you.
> :
> You proved his point exactly rightard.
>
>
No, SFB, we've seen his demented rants too many times before.
You just emphasis the point.
IOW, we don't have to refute anything - you two do it for us.
Up yours, punk.
| |
| Freedom Fighter 2007-02-23, 8:25 pm |
| "Matt Barrow" <matt_barrow@sitefill.com> wrote in message
news:dTpDh.181317$IL1.178677@newsfe13.lga...
> "Freedom Fighter" <liberty@once.net> wrote in message
> news:gcpDh.4403$as2.2394@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> Reasoning (use of facts with integrative logic) with folks such as you is
> like reasoning with my dog. Only she understands more than you.
>
>
> Yes, you are. Sick too.
Again, you are incapable of presenting anything substantial in defense of
the government's 9/11 lies, or to discredit the conspiracy theorists, so
like an immature, mentally-challenged adolescent you continue to sling mud.
Too bad it all bounces back into your own face!
| |
| Freedom Fighter 2007-02-23, 8:25 pm |
| "Matt Barrow" <matt_barrow@sitefill.com> wrote in message
news:otEDh.36359$5F3.13388@newsfe14.lga...
> "Deputy Dumbya Dawg" <Depputyy_Dumbyaa_Daawg@whiteehouuse.gov> wrote in
> message news:m9CDh.5556$tD2.1605@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
[color=darkred]
> No, SFB, we've seen his demented rants too many times before.
>
> You just emphasis the point.
>
> IOW, we don't have to refute anything - you two do it for us.
>
> Up yours, punk.
"Up yours, punk."
How intelligent; how eloquent! Surely it proves him 100% right, and everyone
else wrong.
| |
|
| Matt Barrow wrote:
>
> Yes, you are. Sick too.
>
> Life isn't a game that you wish to make it into.
>
Please don't feed the trolls.
--
Art
| |
| Matt Barrow 2007-02-24, 1:25 pm |
| "Art" <Artemis@spamtrap.invalid> wrote in message
news:EOMDh.13913$GJ3.5268@newsfe18.lga...
> Matt Barrow wrote:
>
> Please don't feed the trolls.
>
He and ilk are killfiled...where they belong.
| |
| Freedom Fighter 2007-02-24, 5:25 pm |
| "Matt Barrow" <matt_barrow@sitefill.com> wrote in message
news:rK%Dh.201717$IL1.113659@newsfe13.lga...
> "Art" <Artemis@spamtrap.invalid> wrote in message
> news:EOMDh.13913$GJ3.5268@newsfe18.lga...
> He and ilk are killfiled...where they belong.
As you now are, brainwashed fools.
| |
| SHOOTER586 2007-02-27, 3:25 am |
| On Feb 24, 2:56 pm, "Freedom Fighter" <libe...@once.net> wrote:
> "Matt Barrow" <matt_bar...@sitefill.com> wrote in message
>
> news:rK%Dh.201717$IL1.113659@newsfe13.lga...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As you now are, brainwashed fools.
Coming from a guy that has shown us all he can only paste others
thoughts and can't think for himself. He can't even think of an ad
hominem quote without pasting it.
Ever find the source of "squibs" and "pull it" from your beginner's
guide to demo lingo?
| |
|
| SHOOTER586 wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2:56 pm, "Freedom Fighter" <libe...@once.net> wrote:
>
> Coming from a guy that has shown us all he can only paste others
> thoughts and can't think for himself. He can't even think of an ad
> hominem quote without pasting it.
>
> Ever find the source of "squibs" and "pull it" from your beginner's
> guide to demo lingo?
>
This thread is so funny although the 9/11 isn't. Now there had been a
review of 9/11 in senate and one of the findings was that US Government
knew of such attacks but they were not able to pinpoint time frame and
location. Also you need a read between the lines of this report even
though it is said that the report was made by independent commision of 5
republicans and 5 democrats, but still it was 10 people who work for the
gov't. There are a lot of unanswered questions and a lot of questions
that media doesn't ask.
Final point is that there is always some truth to everything as long as
your read between the lines and have enough logic to connect the dots.
jack
| |
| SHOOTER586 2007-02-27, 8:25 pm |
| On Feb 27, 3:03 pm, Jack <snowon...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> SHOOTER586 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> This thread is so funny although the 9/11 isn't. Now there had been a
> review of 9/11 in senate and one of the findings was that US Government
> knew of such attacks but they were not able to pinpoint time frame and
> location. Also you need a read between the lines of this report even
> though it is said that the report was made by independent commision of 5
> republicans and 5 democrats, but still it was 10 people who work for the
> gov't. There are a lot of unanswered questions and a lot of questions
> that media doesn't ask.
> Final point is that there is always some truth to everything as long as
> your read between the lines and have enough logic to connect the dots.
>
> jack
"Also you need a read between the lines of this report" = Make up
stuff on the fly.
| |
| Freedom Fighter 2007-02-27, 8:25 pm |
| "Jack" <snowonweb@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:ZM2Fh.2386$BE2.533@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> SHOOTER586 wrote:
[color=darkred]
Anyone that would care to review the old threads in which I've done
successful verbal battle with "Shooter" here can see the truth for
themselves. As above, all he does is sling mud, but he cannot produce a
single rational refutation of what I've stated. He hates the message so he
attacks the messenger, and on top of that accuses the messenger of doing
exactly what he does! I normally do not respond to his comments as I've
killfiled him.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
> This thread is so funny although the 9/11 isn't. Now there had been a
> review of 9/11 in senate and one of the findings was that US Government
> knew of such attacks but they were not able to pinpoint time frame and
> location. Also you need a read between the lines of this report even
> though it is said that the report was made by independent commision of 5
> republicans and 5 democrats, but still it was 10 people who work for the
> gov't. There are a lot of unanswered questions and a lot of questions
> that media doesn't ask.
> Final point is that there is always some truth to everything as long as
> your read between the lines and have enough logic to connect the dots.
>
> jack
| |
| SHOOTER586 2007-02-28, 1:25 pm |
| On Feb 27, 4:23 pm, "Freedom Fighter" <libe...@once.net> wrote:
> "Jack" <snowon...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> news:ZM2Fh.2386$BE2.533@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anyone that would care to review the old threads in which I've done
> successful verbal battle with "Shooter" here can see the truth for
> themselves. As above, all he does is sling mud, but he cannot produce a
> single rational refutation of what I've stated. He hates the message so he
> attacks the messenger, and on top of that accuses the messenger of doing
> exactly what he does! I normally do not respond to his comments as I've
> killfiled him.
Are all your responses in a form of a prepared paste?
This is funny! Now you can't even respond more than once with original
thought.
If you are willing to admit that "squibs" and "pull it" are just mamde
up, you can do so. Nobdy will laugh at you any morte than normal.
| |
|
| SHOOTER586 wrote:
>
> Coming from a guy that has shown us all he can only paste others
> thoughts and can't think for himself. He can't even think of an ad
> hominem quote without pasting it.
>
> Ever find the source of "squibs" and "pull it" from your beginner's
> guide to demo lingo?
>
Please don't feed the troll.
--
Art
|
|
|
|