Home > Archive > Construction forum > July 2005 > Re: 911 WTC analysis









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: 911 WTC analysis
O.G. Wodehouse

2005-07-09, 12:25 pm

Apparently, agent86@justice.spammail.com wrote in
news:p6euc15jkkfl79njrqdjls3uhci8i8qn2r@4ax.com:
quote:

> On 9 Jul 2005 01:02:16 GMT, "P.G. Wodehouse Blues" <master@mason.snuh>
> wrote:
>
>
> Like you do?


I'm building a basketball stadium right now.

How about you?

quote:

>
> Yep. Not only that, the outer wall was also supported by those same
> trusses.



Heh. You're quite the kook.


http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/trusstheory.html

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors...hey-lied-about-
trusses.htm


How is the wind load transferred from the outside of the building to the
inner core?

Via flimsy trusses?

; )

The outer wall is supported by trusses?

Hahahahahahahahahaha.

quote:

hits[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> And they didn't collapse just from the impact. However, it's sort of
> inconvenient for you that the architect has said that the towers were
> designed to take a hit from a 707 (considerably smaller than a 767),
> and fire was never a consideration in the failure analysis from an
> aircraft crash.


I hope you know more about planes than you do buildings. ; )


--
You need to BeDoper
http://www.bedoper.com

187 All Cops
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/c...er_video3a.html

Gortician - 1000 Days in Sodom (Venom Cover) with Jeremy of Despondency
http://www.mindspring.com/~jackiv/gort_1kdays.zip


LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com