Home > Archive > UK gardening > September 2005 > Mini wildlife pond









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Mini wildlife pond
MarkA

2005-09-28, 11:21 am


I want to construct a mini wildlife pond in a container approximately
400mm x 600mm x 300mm depth, sunk into the ground. Which (native)
oxygenating plants would be best in this small space, and should they
be planted in a substrate at the bottom of the container or in pots?

TIA

Mark


--
MarkA
Phil L

2005-09-28, 12:21 pm

MarkA wrote:
:: I want to construct a mini wildlife pond in a container approximately
:: 400mm x 600mm x 300mm depth, sunk into the ground. Which (native)
:: oxygenating plants would be best in this small space, and should they
:: be planted in a substrate at the bottom of the container or in pots?

are you sure you've got those dimensions correct? - it will be less than 2ft
sqare and barely visible, with or without plants.

--
If God had intended us to drink beer, He would have given us stomachs.


Kay

2005-09-28, 4:21 pm

In article <MarkA.1w2o7y@gardenbanter.co.uk>, MarkA <MarkA.1w2o7y@garden
banter.co.uk> writes
>
>I want to construct a mini wildlife pond in a container approximately
>400mm x 600mm x 300mm depth, sunk into the ground. Which (native)
>oxygenating plants would be best in this small space, and should they
>be planted in a substrate at the bottom of the container or in pots?
>

If it's to be wildlife, most important thing will be to have some sort
of ramp up to the edge so amphibious wildlife can get out.

--
Kay
"Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river"

Malcolm Stewart

2005-09-28, 8:21 pm

"Kay" <kay@scarboro.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1SjcUlCHouODFwgJ@scarboro.demon.co.uk...
> In article <MarkA.1w2o7y@gardenbanter.co.uk>, MarkA <MarkA.1w2o7y@garden
> banter.co.uk> writes
>
> If it's to be wildlife, most important thing will be to have some sort
> of ramp up to the edge so amphibious wildlife can get out.


A friend finds that frogs seem to have no problem in near vertical smooth
sided containers in her garden. And their tops are about 30cm above ground
level. No idea how they get in or out.

--
M Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm




Kay

2005-09-29, 1:21 pm

In article <dhf82d$4ij$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, Malcolm Stewart
<malcolm_stewart@megalith.freeserve.co.uk> writes
>"Kay" <kay@scarboro.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:1SjcUlCHouODFwgJ@scarboro.demon.co.uk...
>
>A friend finds that frogs seem to have no problem in near vertical smooth
>sided containers in her garden. And their tops are about 30cm above ground
>level. No idea how they get in or out.
>

Is this adult frogs or babies? I'd find it hard to imagine a half inch
long frogling getting out.
--
Kay
"Do not insult the crocodile until you have crossed the river"

Malcolm Stewart

2005-09-29, 3:21 pm

"Kay" <kay@scarboro.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:7MM$jeE8IBPDFwZh@scarboro.demon.co.uk...
> In article <dhf82d$4ij$1@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>, Malcolm Stewart
> <malcolm_stewart@megalith.freeserve.co.uk> writes
ground[color=darkred]
> Is this adult frogs or babies? I'd find it hard to imagine a half inch
> long frogling getting out.
> --


Adults, from memory.

--
M Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm



datsy

2005-09-29, 4:21 pm


> are you sure you've got those dimensions correct? - it will be less than
> 2ft
> sqare and barely visible, with or without plants.
>


Here's an idea for a tiny watergarden:
http://www.pallensmith.com/index.ph...d=915&Itemid=98


LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com