|
| On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:33:13 +0100, amacmil304@aol.com wrote:
>If Malcolm Ogilvie aimed his recent comment against me and was lying
>when he said it was a "general comment" not directed at me, then he
>should have the courage to come clean.
>
>Here's a suggestion for a letter he could write if that's the case:
>
>Dear Angus
>
>I admit I have been stupid. My tirade to Malcolm Kane was meant to
>get at you but when you responded I thought I could use it as a tool
>of ridicule against you in the future. That's why I lied and said it
>was a "general comment" and not aimed at you..
>
>I fully understand that my comment amounts to a disgraceful slur
>against children leaving school with only one O Grade but it was my
>lie that made it such, and I apologise unreservedly.
>
>As a proven liar, I am now tendering my resignation to Scottish
>Natural Heritage as a scientific adviser, and apologise for the
>embarrassment I have caused them.
>
>Yours sincerely
>
>Malcolm.
>
>
>If the tirade was not directed at me and was a slur against children
>with one O grade he should resign anyway.
That should cover it.
|
|