Home > Archive > UK gardening > March 2007 > Danae racemosa [was Re: Two pampas grass questions]









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Danae racemosa [was Re: Two pampas grass questions]
Nick Maclaren

2007-03-27, 9:25 am


I have the delight of needing to reduce a 25 year old clump of Danae
racemosa (c. 3' across at the base). While that will be less of a
bloodbath, it isn't going to be any easier. The problem is that I
don't just want to get rid of it, as I want to replant some and give
some away.

Any ideas welcome :-(


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)

2007-03-27, 9:25 am


"Nick Maclaren" <nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:euatib$814$1@gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk...
>
> I have the delight of needing to reduce a 25 year old clump of Danae
> racemosa (c. 3' across at the base). While that will be less of a
> bloodbath, it isn't going to be any easier. The problem is that I
> don't just want to get rid of it, as I want to replant some and give
> some away.
>
> Any ideas welcome :-(
>
>
> Regards,
> Nick Maclaren.


That's the plant that does a good impression of a cross between a posh
Laurel and an Aucuba?
AFAIK it spreads by runners (rhizomes?) so it should be easy to grab a few
healthy bits. I might be wrong but I think the plant is fairly shallow
rooted.


Nick Maclaren

2007-03-27, 9:25 am


In article <46090426@212.67.96.135>,
"Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" <reply@newsgroups.com> writes:
|>
|> That's the plant that does a good impression of a cross between a posh
|> Laurel and an Aucuba?

Not really. It is a vastly posher form of butcher's broom. It is THE
best plant for cut foliage.

|> AFAIK it spreads by runners (rhizomes?) so it should be easy to grab a few
|> healthy bits. I might be wrong but I think the plant is fairly shallow
|> rooted.

No, it doesn't. It forms a dense mat of thick roots. You are right
that it is shallow rooted, but a 3' diameter lump 1' thick weighs
what? More than I can lift at my time of life ....


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)

2007-03-27, 9:25 am


"Nick Maclaren" <nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:eub112$fgp$1@gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk...
>
> In article <46090426@212.67.96.135>,
> "Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" <reply@newsgroups.com> writes:
> |>
> |> That's the plant that does a good impression of a cross between a posh
> |> Laurel and an Aucuba?
>
> Not really. It is a vastly posher form of butcher's broom. It is THE
> best plant for cut foliage.
>
> |> AFAIK it spreads by runners (rhizomes?) so it should be easy to grab a
> few
> |> healthy bits. I might be wrong but I think the plant is fairly shallow
> |> rooted.
>
> No, it doesn't. It forms a dense mat of thick roots. You are right
> that it is shallow rooted, but a 3' diameter lump 1' thick weighs
> what? More than I can lift at my time of life ....
>
>
> Regards,
> Nick Maclaren.


Can't be bovered to do the pi r*2 bit along with soil density. I agree it
will be heavy. A very sharp spade perhaps or a chain saw (bushmans saw) :-)


Nick Maclaren

2007-03-27, 9:25 am


In article <4609114f@212.67.96.135>,
"Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" <reply@newsgroups.com> writes:
|>
|> Can't be bovered to do the pi r*2 bit along with soil density. I agree it
|> will be heavy. A very sharp spade perhaps or a chain saw (bushmans saw) :-)

What's wrong with a bit of mental arithmetic? Call it a quarter of a
ton. I shall use the former, but any saw I use will be with no moving
parts.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com