|
Home > Archive > UK gardening > June 2007 > Re: Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about
|
|
| Rudy Canoza 2007-06-25, 1:25 pm |
| self-marginalized angie girl wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:55:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza <rudy-canoza@excite.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Obviously your
YOU'RE, angie girl. In addition to being
self-marginalized, you're also semi-literate.
> too stupid to see the comparison.
There's no comparison, angie girl. There's no
comparison for several reasons, among them:
- scale
- scope
- consequences
- systematic (CDs)
No, there's no comparison, and in addition, even
attempting to inject it into the debate is a logical
fallacy. You commit a lot of logical fallacies, angie
girl.
>
> And I have explained everyone kills wildlife.
You haven't explained why *YOU* do it in direct
violation of your supposed belief in animal "rights",
angie girl. *I* have explained why you do it, angie
girl: because you're a venal, lying hypocrite. That's
why you do it, angie girl.
>
> How?
That's a stupid question, angie girl. Stupid, because
it's obviously insincere and cynical. You *know* how,
angie girl. You know how because 'ontheroad' and I,
and probably Dutch, have already *told* you how you do
it, and how easily we can see you do it.
You do it every time you go into the shops and buy some
produce, angie girl - produce whose production and
distribution you *know* caused animals to be maimed and
slaughtered; produce that you *NEED NOT* buy, but which
you do buy because you're a lazy fuck who can't be
bothered to put your so-called "principles" into action.
Every bit of food you put into your lying, greedy
mouth, angie girl, caused animals to die, and they died
in a process whose scale, scope and lack of
consequences means the deaths are NOT COMPARABLE to
human traffic deaths or human deaths in war. This lack
of comparability is well elaborated and established,
angie girl, but because you're a vile, cynical,
self-absorbed narcissistic shitbag who pretends she's
on a moral pedestal, you blind yourself to it.
> Everybody knows it happens and it happens to humans too.
Not comparable, as I've demonstrated, angie girl. But
even if it were, angie girl, your pathetic evasion
constitutes a logical fallacy: tu quoque. You cannot
escape the harsh light of GUILT for your own willful,
unnecessary violation of animal so-called "rights" by
trying to point out what you wrongly believe to be
similar violations of human rights by your accusers.
You need to address the accusations against you head
on, angie girl, and you fail. But hyper-emotional and
illogical fops usually fail at logical endeavors, and
there's no reason to think you'd be an exception, angie
girl.
>
> You're the bullshitter.
No, angie girl. You are the bullshitter. You're also
a self-marginalized twat, angie girl.
|
|
|
|
|