|
| Kevin Aylward wrote:
quote:
> ehsjr wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> One does. However, this doesn't meant that one completely ignores DC
> conditions on component parameter values.
>
> The issue here is one of the context of the claim.
>
>
>
>
> But, this is out of context. When someone says that they are analysing
> AC and DC separately, they don't *really* mean that they are completely
> oblivious and are ignoring the fact that, e.g. an inductor might
> saturate if it has a DC current through it. They simple mean that, for
> the ac analysis the dc level is not relevant and take it as already read
> that such analyses is performed with the *correct* value of inductance
> for the inductor.
Kevin,
I'm glad you know what people *really* mean. :-) However, you
*really* do need to read the relevant posts again.
Here's the context:
quote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>What you are suggesting is a good issue to keep in mind for the real
>world (and one I had overlooked).
Saturation was overlooked. Case closed.
<snip>
quote:
>
> Kevin Aylward
> informationEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
> http://www.anasoft.co.uk
> SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
> Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
> Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
>
>
|
|