|
|
After my wives started filing restraining orders against me and/or
calling the cops, I started calling the cops first and claimed to be
"the victim" of a beating by my wife. As you can see, when you click on
the "Disposition" link at the top of the page, all but a few cases were
dismissed by my wives because they knew what waited for them if they
didn't.
>
Alaska is cool if you want to really control women, i.e. it has the
highest rate of rape in any state.
>
Open the url to get my court record which I am very proud of. It should
look like the "text copy" below, if not, it timed out so you will have
to type my name back in the empty spaces then just hit "submit" and it
will come back up. Just click on the court case number to get more info
on me. Yep, I learned quick on how to beat my wives into doing what I
wanted them to do, then claimed to be the victim, but you will see I
DID PLEAD NO CONTEST (meaning that I was guilty and not going to
contest the charges) A COUPLE OF TIMES BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE WAS TOO
STRONG AGAINST ME.
>
Court View 2000 - Public Access
http://www.courtrecords.alaska.gov/pa/pa.urd/PAMW6500
>
---
Jerry wrote:
> giganews wrote:
>
> Because the price of copper has tripled in the last year or so,
> material costs are becoming more of a factor in the total price of
> parallel combinations. This appears to be a problem in linear
> programming, the type that would be in a text book for economics.
> Also, there is the problem of material availability and bulk prices.
> For instance, if I were to order conductors all of one size for a major
> job, I would get a better discount. One utility in Valdez, Alaska
> installs all 2/0 aluminum for underground service laterals parallel or
> otherwise. That is all they buy in bulk. This bulk buying becomes
> even more prevalent for metal clad cable used in large mines. Three
> $500 million mines that have recently been built in Alaska using almost
> all metal clad cables. The problem of running metal clad cable from a
> large transformer is complicated by the fact that using many parallel
> sets from the transformer to the switchgear requires a full sized
> equipment grounding conductor which is not in the cables unless they
> are special ordered. The engineers in these situations attempt to
> argue that the equipment grounding conductor in the cable in parallel
> with the metal sheath is sufficient to equal the full size grounding
> conductor which in many cases is debatable. For instance, let's say
> we are supplying 4000 amperes using 15 each 4/0 per phase. The
> required equipment grounding conductor is 400 kcmil. By code there
> should be a 400 kcmil in each cable but there isn't one.
|
|