|
Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > March 2006 > the pageRe: 60 Hz Vs 50 Hz
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
the pageRe: 60 Hz Vs 50 Hz
|
|
| Roy L. Fuchs 2006-03-12, 6:21 pm |
| On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:27:26 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Gave us:
>In many TV broadcasts of films, the even scans are not the same (film)
>frame as the odd scans. It is readily apparent if you step through
>captured video frame by frame on a computer during a rapidly moving scene
>or when they cut from one scene to another. These films appear to have
>been transferred using the sequence (1/1) (1/2) (2/2) (3/3) (4/4).
>The numbers are the 24 fps film frames, the parenthesis are the 30 fps
>video, the number before the slash are the odd video scans, after the
>slash the even video scans. Note the second frame has the odd and even
>scans of different scenes. Perhaps one that would appear smoother is the
>sequence (1/1) (1/2) (2/3) (3/3) (4/4), but I don't know if that is done.
Since 1978, they have been done from LD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_disc
About halfway down, hit the "technical specs" area. Find the CAV,
and CLV descriptions to find out the facts about your conversion.
Inform yourself.
| |
| Keith 2006-03-12, 11:21 pm |
| On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:07:24 +0000, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
> About halfway down, hit the "technical specs" area. Find the CAV,
> and CLV descriptions to find out the facts about your conversion.
> Inform yourself.
Wow! Five responses to one article. You are a fruitcake, dim bulb!
--
Keith
| |
| Roy L. Fuchs 2006-03-13, 12:21 am |
| On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:09:12 -0500, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:
>On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:07:24 +0000, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>
>Wow! Five responses to one article. You are a fruitcake, dim bulb!
No, dipshit. Five separate articles to one response.
| |
| Keith 2006-03-13, 12:21 am |
| On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:49:09 +0000, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:09:12 -0500, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:
>
>
> No, dipshit. Five separate articles to one response.
Oh, so you freely admit that you're a fruitcake. Ok, carry-on DimBulb.
--
Keith
|
|
|
|
|