|
Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > August 2006 > Re: Just How Wrong IS Ward Hardman. Ward F Hardman, Jr, Age: 59 (born 1946), Address: 12675 Epica C
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: Just How Wrong IS Ward Hardman. Ward F Hardman, Jr, Age: 59 (born 1946), Address: 12675 Epica C
|
|
| Ward Hardmanure 2006-08-17, 3:25 am |
|
james_c_cracked@yahoo.com wrote:
> It still makes me chuckle when I recall it. A couple of weeks ago Wardy
> said I should 'Hang my head in shame' for being mistaken about when an
> email account I stopped using months ago got deleted by yahoo.
>
> Below are some recent examples of far more significant instances where
> Wardy has been wrong. Indeed, if he keeps on being wrong it will be
> more than simply embarrassing to him. It may wind up being devastating
> for his family.
>
> Will Wardy 'hang his head in shame' over these? Naaah. Wardy has no
> shame.
>
> Let me count the ways.
>
> 1) Wardy insists that posters such as Ward F Moron Jr, Ward Fatman, the
> poster formerly known as Jim Smith, etc., are all the same person,
> namely me.
>
> WRONG!!! One day perhaps Wardy will learn how to download and read
> headers and ip numbers. Until that day we can all laugh at him. In a
> rough census I once counted 3 or 4 US states, 3 or 4 countries and 2
> continents among Wardy's 'sock puppets.' Wardy 'thinks' there is some
> mysterious way to do this from one location. Wardy gives me too much
> credit. Not even highly sophisticated hackers can forge ip trails,
> which are hardwired into their path. That's why hackers get caught.
> Since Wardy is immune to comprehending this he 'thinks' he's safe to
> embarrass himself over and over and over by claiming we are all the
> same person. This comforts poor Wardy. It makes him think he is less
> unpopular than he actually is.
>
> 2) Ward claims he is full of concern, regard and protectiveness for his
> family, particularly his daughter CJ.
>
> WRONG!!!!
>
> These people may have some significance to Wardy in a low, animal sort
> of way. But none of them compare in importance with Wardy's inflated
> EGO.Wardy has been told over and over that if he wants to protect his
> loved ones from usenet infamy all he has to do is stop posting replies
> to my posts and go back to posting harmless classical music-related
> topics. He can't do this, not even to spare his family devastating
> embarrassment and trouble, because his EGO is THE most important thing
> to him in his life. Period.
>
> Sooner or later CJ is going to read these threads and demand to know
> from dad how come he never just stopped. I wonder how old Wardy is
> going to 'spin' that one?
>
> 3) On 31 July Wardy said, "I'm not going to give you *any* information
> on my family."
>
> WRONG!!!! Three days later he gave a loooong biographical thumbnail
> sketch on his daughter CJ to 'answer' the claim that CJ is a lesbian.
> Incidentally, nowhere in his reply does he ever deny she is a lesbian.
> Indeed, Wardy is so bad at dissembling (or 'disassembling' as Global
> Warming Bush puts it) that he gives away the farm just about every time
> he opens his mouth. Example, when I got his age wrong (I said 60 when
> it's still 59) he corrected me *several* times. Nowhere does he say CJ
> isn't a denizen of Lesbos, therefor she must be. If it were otherwise
> Wardy would be full of tales about boyfriends.
>
> Incidentally, I have NO problem with lesbians. I couldn't care less
> about someone's sexual orientation. I don't even comprehend why it has
> relevance to anyone. But to someone like Wardy, a staunch Repoopican
> and therefor a sexual bigot, it must be a HUGE embarrassment.
>
> Also, Wardy is a turd pervert and I DO find that disgusting when it's
> waved around in my face all the time.
>
> 4) Wardy thinks that the limerick is the pinnacle of high art and is
> constantly congratulating himself on his 'talent' and denigrating
> others for apparent lack of same.
>
> WRONG!!!! Ah, the limerick, the kazoo of the poetical instruments, to
> poetry what the velvet Elvis is to painting.
>
> Sorry Wardy old boy, but it's nothing special. In fact in your hands
> it's bizarre and sickening. Allow me to explain in verse:
>
> A limerick's easy to write,
> You could pen ten or twenty tonight,
> But when 'neath your words
> Lurks a fetish for turds
> It's sick and disgusting and trite!
|
|
|
|
|