Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > February 2007 > Oscilloscope needed for circuit to work









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Oscilloscope needed for circuit to work
ProjectPIP@gmail.com

2007-02-14, 5:25 pm

for some weird reason, my circuit works only when i attached the
oscilloscope to the output. This is extremely weird. According to the
people I have consulted, I needed to add a resistor and capacitor
between the place the oscilloscope is attached to ground. However, I
am unable to tell what value is needed for the resistor and capacitor

Ben Miller

2007-02-14, 5:25 pm

<ProjectPIP@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171485788.361935.99050@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> for some weird reason, my circuit works only when i attached the
> oscilloscope to the output. This is extremely weird. According to the
> people I have consulted, I needed to add a resistor and capacitor
> between the place the oscilloscope is attached to ground. However, I
> am unable to tell what value is needed for the resistor and capacitor
>


If the scope probe is "x1", then to you can simulate it with
R= 1 Megohm
C= approx 10-30 picofarad (exact value not critical)

If it is "x10", then use
R=10 megohm
C= approx 1-5 picofarad

Connect them in parallel, from the point where the scope was connected, to
ground.

Ben Miller

--
Benjamin D. Miller, PE
B. MILLER ENGINEERING
www.bmillerengineering.com


Palindrome

2007-02-14, 5:25 pm

ProjectPIP@gmail.com wrote:
> for some weird reason, my circuit works only when i attached the
> oscilloscope to the output. This is extremely weird. According to the
> people I have consulted, I needed to add a resistor and capacitor
> between the place the oscilloscope is attached to ground. However, I
> am unable to tell what value is needed for the resistor and capacitor
>


This does rather depend on the circuit and whether it needs the probe
tip to be connected, the earth clip, or both...

If the circuit is a 3kW inverter - then I would suspect that it is the
earth clip connection that makes the difference. If it is an oscillator,
the probe capacitance may be making the difference. If it is a dc
threshold detector, it is more likely to be the probe resistance to
ground...

Whatever it is, it presumably wasn't designed or intended to work like
that. Generally it is much better to revisit the design and correct it,
than make it work without reasoning why. Otherwise, if a component has
to be replaced, or a second unit built, the circuit may then need *two*
scopes to be connected before it works...

--
Sue



Adrian C

2007-02-15, 1:25 pm

ProjectPIP@gmail.com wrote:
> for some weird reason, my circuit works only when i attached the
> oscilloscope to the output. This is extremely weird.


Don't worry. Some of the circuits I've built in the past only work when
I've attached my finger to a crucial point. OK for my own portable
equipment but a bit of a pain if the equipment is on sale to someone else.

--
Adrian C
cr500r

2007-02-16, 1:25 pm

I built a cable descrambler from a kit, and the only way it worked stable
was touching a certain piont with my finger.
After some experimenting it turned out to be the 60Hz signal I was injecting
(probably helped the PLL sync), so I soldered a wire to that point and then
wrapped (a few turns) the other end around the insulated 9v AC power lines
(see inductive coupling), stable for ever afterward.

"Adrian C" <email@here.invalid> wrote in message
news:53jfblF1srfqqU1@mid.individual.net...
> ProjectPIP@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Don't worry. Some of the circuits I've built in the past only work when
> I've attached my finger to a crucial point. OK for my own portable
> equipment but a bit of a pain if the equipment is on sale to someone else.
>
> --
> Adrian C



LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com