|
Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > February 2007 > OK, I get it
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| John E. 2007-02-16, 9:25 am |
| A second reading of the ds shows that, indeed, a transistor is needed to use
a CA display with the MC14511.
[gotta stop these early morning designs...]
--
John English
| |
| John Popelish 2007-02-16, 9:25 am |
| John E. wrote:
> A second reading of the ds shows that, indeed, a transistor is needed to use
> a CA display with the MC14511.
>
> [gotta stop these early morning designs...]
I would do happier with you if you stopped changing thread
titles.
| |
| John E. 2007-02-16, 1:25 pm |
| > I would do happier with you if you stopped changing thread
> titles.
Sorry, I didn't know this caused a break in thread. My reader simply inserts
the re-titled post in the same thread, just with another title. I should have
realized that not all reader apps behave the same.
Sincere apologies. Will avoid temptation in future.
--
John English
| |
| John Popelish 2007-02-16, 5:25 pm |
| John E. wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't know this caused a break in thread. My reader simply inserts
> the re-titled post in the same thread, just with another title. I should have
> realized that not all reader apps behave the same.
>
> Sincere apologies. Will avoid temptation in future.
I appreciate it. It is not so much a problem with broken
threads, for me, as much as it is that I remember the thread
title of threads I have been reading. When you change the
thread title, I have to go back and review earlier messages
to remember what subject we are talking about.
| |
| Homer J Simpson 2007-02-16, 5:25 pm |
|
"John E." <incognito@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C1FB45080171E6AAF01826C8@news.readfreenews.net...
>
> Sorry, I didn't know this caused a break in thread. My reader simply
> inserts
> the re-titled post in the same thread, just with another title. I should
> have
> realized that not all reader apps behave the same.
Most readers use the message ID and work correctly.
--
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
| |
| Rich Grise 2007-02-16, 5:25 pm |
| On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:46:22 -0500, John Popelish wrote:
> John E. wrote:
>
> I appreciate it. It is not so much a problem with broken
> threads, for me, as much as it is that I remember the thread
> title of threads I have been reading. When you change the
> thread title, I have to go back and review earlier messages
> to remember what subject we are talking about.
I've been known to do that on occasion, but when I do I always put
<new subject> WAS: <old subject> - it might not help with threading,
(my reader also threads messages based on the thread rather than
the title), but at least you'd know what the previous parts were
about.
Cheers!
Rich
| |
| John E. 2007-02-17, 3:25 am |
| John Popelish sez:
> I appreciate it.
And I, appreciating your many contributions to posted questions, will
endeavour to make my questions as memorable (in a good way) as possible (c:
> It is not so much a problem with broken
> threads, for me, as much as it is that I remember the thread
> title of threads I have been reading. When you change the
> thread title, I have to go back and review earlier messages
> to remember what subject we are talking about.
Eminently logical.
--
John English
| |
| John Popelish 2007-02-17, 3:25 am |
| John E. wrote:
> John Popelish sez:
>
>
> And I, appreciating your many contributions to posted questions, will
> endeavour to make my questions as memorable (in a good way) as possible (c:
>
>
> Eminently logical.
This conversation has been such a nice change from the flame
wars I see here, so often. And it is a pleasant experience
to finally meet a Vulcan. ;-)
| |
| MassiveProng 2007-02-17, 3:25 am |
| On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:37:01 -0500, John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net>
Gave us:
>John E. wrote:
>
>This conversation has been such a nice change from the flame
>wars I see here, so often. And it is a pleasant experience
>to finally meet a Vulcan. ;-)
Yeah! So there!!!
I guess I'm a Vulgan ;-]
| |
| joseph2k 2007-02-18, 3:25 am |
| John Popelish wrote:
> John E. wrote:
>
> This conversation has been such a nice change from the flame
> wars I see here, so often. And it is a pleasant experience
> to finally meet a Vulcan. ;-)
Actually i would not credit the curse wars that pass for flame wars
currently. Really proper flaming requires proper cited backup. But i got
spoiled in the early 1980's when usenet was not full cry baby, bull
shitter, wannabees.
--
JosephKK
Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â_Â_
--Schiller
|
|
|
|
|