|
Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > May 2007 > How to measure a highly intense Alternating Mag Field of 100kHz and 200Gs?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
How to measure a highly intense Alternating Mag Field of 100kHz and 200Gs?
|
|
|
| Dears
I've got an intense mag-field (f=100kHz, amplitude=200Gs),
but no suitable detectors could be applied to it to make an acuurate
measurement.
I just use a small induction coil but not so precise, while the hall
devices were always destroyed when put into the field.
Anybody knows any other detectors or devices for measure such a
intense AMF, besides induction coil ?
thanks
| |
|
| wang wrote:
Not sure why you believe that a small induction coil would not be precise.
Working from first principles would seem to be best. It's easy to
accurately measure the dimensions of the coil, and turn counting is
trivial. Very easy to measure milivolt or lower lever 100kHz signal
M Walter
> Dears
>
> I've got an intense mag-field (f=100kHz, amplitude=200Gs),
> but no suitable detectors could be applied to it to make an acuurate
> measurement.
> I just use a small induction coil but not so precise, while the hall
> devices were always destroyed when put into the field.
> Anybody knows any other detectors or devices for measure such a
> intense AMF, besides induction coil ?
>
> thanks
| |
| JackShepherd 2007-05-26, 5:25 pm |
| On Sat, 26 May 2007 18:26:24 GMT, Mark <MarkRWalter@SBCGlobal.net> wrote:
>wang wrote:
>
>Not sure why you believe that a small induction coil would not be precise.
>Working from first principles would seem to be best. It's easy to
>accurately measure the dimensions of the coil, and turn counting is
>trivial. Very easy to measure milivolt or lower lever 100kHz signal
>M Walter
>
Also, placement of the coil would be critical for repeatable results.
Attaching it somewhere, even if not in the entire field, could be
calibrated to read whole field strength... likely.
Top posting in Usenet is for dummies. This ain't e-mail.
|
|
|
|
|