Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > June 2007 > Please answer my rational question [was Re: AM radio: astronomically-high frequency modulator signa









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Please answer my rational question [was Re: AM radio: astronomically-high frequency modulator signa
Radium

2007-06-27, 1:25 pm

On Jun 25, 8:24 pm, "John Campbell" <spaml...@spamless.com> wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci....491cfe81?hl=en&
:
> "Sam Wormley" <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote in message
>
> news:I%Zfi.181358$_c5.177602@attbi_s22...
>
>
>
>
> yes there are. One needs to look in the frequency domain.


So it is NOT mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with
a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000
gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
nanosecond and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM
carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaeons and whose amplitude is a minimum of
10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-
(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000)
nanosecond?????????????????????????????????????????????

If it is not possible, then please explain
why?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an
extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-
power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a
nanosecond is shorter than a second.

10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely
large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000
gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle.

Gigaeon = a billion eons

Eon = a billion years

Gigacycle = a billion cycles.

*nanocycle = billionth of a cycle

Gigaphoton = a billion photons

10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one
large large number.

10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000

So you get:

(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000)

10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000)

10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the-
power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to-
the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-
to-the-power-1,000,000,000)]

No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the
jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am
really interested in this.

LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com