Home > Archive > Electrical Engineering > June 2007 > Re: AM radio: astronomically-high frequency modulator signal present on an astronomically-low frequ









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: AM radio: astronomically-high frequency modulator signal present on an astronomically-low frequ
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com

2007-06-27, 5:25 pm

In sci.physics.electromag Paul Cardinale <pcardinale@volcanomail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 9:25 pm, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
[color=darkred]
> I answered it. Reread.


[color=darkred]
> Voltage.


[color=darkred]
> If changes in parameter X of thing A cause analogous changes to
> parameter Y of thing B,
> then the X of A is modulating the Y of B. In the case of TTL, binary
> data modulates DC voltage.


[color=darkred]
> You seem to think that all modulation must be based upon amplitude
> modulation of a sine wave. It isn't (see above). As for an equation
> for TTL, it's trivial: Voltage = (high_level) * (binary data).


Umm, no.

You might want to look up what "e.g." means.

Would you have been happier if I had said "e.g. FM is
x(t) = xc * cos [wc * t + {b * sin (wm * t)}]"?

So is your trivial equation in the time domain or the frequency
domain as I see neither a time nor a frequency component in it?

Or should I perhaps just look under "voltage modulation" in the
IEEE Dictionary?

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
LinkBot





Other archives available: Cellular phones topics archive | Web Design forum archive | Software help archive | Hardware reviews archive | Programming topics archive

Copyright 2004 - 2008 homeownerschat.com