Electrical Engineering - Closed Delta 120/240V 3-phase service

Author

Closed Delta 120/240V 3-phase service

Beachcomber

2008-02-10, 3:25 am

In the case of a commercial building served by 3 phase - closed delta
240/120 Vservice, what is the best way to detect a ground fault on a
three phase motor circuit on phase C were it to come into contact with
the ground?

Whereas the service transformer on phase AB has the only centered
tapped (neutral) windings 120V phase-to-neutral and 240V
phase-to-phase and phase C (not connected to the phase AB transformer)
is the wild phase.

It seems to me that (without additional protective equipment), if
phase C accidently touches the ground there would be a voltage
imbalance, but the overcurrent protection would not necessarily trip
off.

Am I wrong by assuming this?

Also, what, in general, are the pros and cons of a 120/240V 3 phase
closed delta connection?

Is this a good choice for a small commercial building with a 3 story
hydraulic elevator and mostly 120V. appliance and lighting loads?

Beachcomber

Long Ranger

2008-02-10, 3:25 am

"Beachcomber" <invalid@notreal.none> wrote in message
news:47ae909e.262625@news.verizon.net...
>
> In the case of a commercial building served by 3 phase - closed delta
> 240/120 Vservice, what is the best way to detect a ground fault on a
> three phase motor circuit on phase C were it to come into contact with
> the ground?
>
> Whereas the service transformer on phase AB has the only centered
> tapped (neutral) windings 120V phase-to-neutral and 240V
> phase-to-phase and phase C (not connected to the phase AB transformer)
> is the wild phase.
>
> It seems to me that (without additional protective equipment), if
> phase C accidently touches the ground there would be a voltage
> imbalance, but the overcurrent protection would not necessarily trip
> off.
>
> Am I wrong by assuming this?
>
> Also, what, in general, are the pros and cons of a 120/240V 3 phase
> closed delta connection?
>
> Is this a good choice for a small commercial building with a 3 story
> hydraulic elevator and mostly 120V. appliance and lighting loads?
>
> Beachcomber

I don't know what you mean by the first question. In answer to your second;
In general terms you want the 240 system when your predominate load is small
to medium hp 3-phase motors. If you are going to supply primarily lighting
and receptacle loads, then a 208 4-wire system is an obvious advantage.
>

gfretwell@aol.com

2008-02-10, 3:25 am

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:10:33 GMT, invalid@notreal.none (Beachcomber)
wrote:

>
>In the case of a commercial building served by 3 phase - closed delta
>240/120 Vservice, what is the best way to detect a ground fault on a
>three phase motor circuit on phase C were it to come into contact with
>the ground?
>
>Whereas the service transformer on phase AB has the only centered
>tapped (neutral) windings 120V phase-to-neutral and 240V
>phase-to-phase and phase C (not connected to the phase AB transformer)
>is the wild phase.
>
>It seems to me that (without additional protective equipment), if
>phase C accidently touches the ground there would be a voltage
>imbalance, but the overcurrent protection would not necessarily trip
>off.
>
>Am I wrong by assuming this?
>
>Also, what, in general, are the pros and cons of a 120/240V 3 phase
>closed delta connection?
>
>Is this a good choice for a small commercial building with a 3 story
>hydraulic elevator and mostly 120V. appliance and lighting loads?
>
>Beachcomber
>
>
>

The 3d leg is 208v above ground and it would trip the O/C device if it
faults.

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-10, 3:25 am

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:10:33 GMT Beachcomber <invalid@notreal.none> wrote:

| In the case of a commercial building served by 3 phase - closed delta
| 240/120 Vservice, what is the best way to detect a ground fault on a
| three phase motor circuit on phase C were it to come into contact with
| the ground?

A GFI device? All 4 wires (A,B,C,N) would run through the CT together.

| Whereas the service transformer on phase AB has the only centered
| tapped (neutral) windings 120V phase-to-neutral and 240V
| phase-to-phase and phase C (not connected to the phase AB transformer)
| is the wild phase.

It is 208 volts relative to ground.

| It seems to me that (without additional protective equipment), if
| phase C accidently touches the ground there would be a voltage
| imbalance, but the overcurrent protection would not necessarily trip
| off.
|
| Am I wrong by assuming this?

That depends on how solid the ground path is. If the impedance is high
to get back to the source, maybe not enough current will flow. That
could easily be the case if it contacts earth. It could even be the
case if it contacts a metal part of the building. But if the impedance
is low enough, you get high current.

Still, if there is any risk of a ground fault, and especially one that
could be contacted by a person as part of the ground path, then ground
fault protection would be a good thing to have. A GFI device?

| Also, what, in general, are the pros and cons of a 120/240V 3 phase
| closed delta connection?

If there is a loss of one phase in this system it can lead to trouble.
Delta can have back-energizing issues as well as lopsided loading if
a phase is lost. And 240D/120 would be quickly out of balance if the
120 volt loads predominate. Alternatively, a Scott-T version of that
could help in limited 3-phase loading environments.

| Is this a good choice for a small commercial building with a 3 story
| hydraulic elevator and mostly 120V. appliance and lighting loads?

208Y/120. Configure the elevator system for 208 volts. It is the more
common electrical system in the USA, now. An elevator manufacturer not
being able to do 208 volts is limit their market severely.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-10-0057@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Ben Miller

2008-02-12, 9:25 am

Beachcomber wrote:
> In the case of a commercial building served by 3 phase - closed delta
> 240/120 Vservice, what is the best way to detect a ground fault on a
> three phase motor circuit on phase C were it to come into contact with
> the ground?
>
> Whereas the service transformer on phase AB has the only centered
> tapped (neutral) windings 120V phase-to-neutral and 240V
> phase-to-phase and phase C (not connected to the phase AB transformer)
> is the wild phase.
>
> It seems to me that (without additional protective equipment), if
> phase C accidently touches the ground there would be a voltage
> imbalance, but the overcurrent protection would not necessarily trip
> off.
>
> Am I wrong by assuming this?
>
> Also, what, in general, are the pros and cons of a 120/240V 3 phase
> closed delta connection?
>
> Is this a good choice for a small commercial building with a 3 story
> hydraulic elevator and mostly 120V. appliance and lighting loads?
>
> Beachcomber

The protective device will trip if phase C is grounded, just as for the
other phases. The delta system will not allow full utilization of the
available kVA, since one phase can not be used for the single-phase loads.
With mostly 120V lighting & appliances, I would go 208/120 4-wire wye, so
you get the benefit of all three phases for the 120V loads. Run the
elevators & A/C on 208 3-phase.

Benjamin D Miller, PE
www.bmillerengineering.com

gfretwell@aol.com

2008-02-12, 1:25 pm

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:13:08 -0600, "Ben Miller" <Ben@somewhere>
wrote:

>Beachcomber wrote:
>
>
>The protective device will trip if phase C is grounded, just as for the
>other phases. The delta system will not allow full utilization of the
>available kVA, since one phase can not be used for the single-phase loads.
>With mostly 120V lighting & appliances, I would go 208/120 4-wire wye, so
>you get the benefit of all three phases for the 120V loads. Run the
>elevators & A/C on 208 3-phase.
>
>
>Benjamin D Miller, PE
>www.bmillerengineering.com
>

I have only seen center tapped "closed delta" a few times, notably in
the alley next to the Hog's Breath Salloon in Key West (look at the
pole behind the stage) and I bet from the looks of it they added the
3d transformer as the load increased. Usually it is "open delta" with
2 transformers as a cheap way to get some 3 phase to a customer who
has mostly single phase loads.
The open delta was actually pretty popular in the light industrial
areas of East Naples (Florida).

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-12, 1:25 pm

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:53:59 -0500 gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
| On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:13:08 -0600, "Ben Miller" <Ben@somewhere>
| wrote:
|
|>Beachcomber wrote:
|>> In the case of a commercial building served by 3 phase - closed delta
|>> 240/120 Vservice, what is the best way to detect a ground fault on a
|>> three phase motor circuit on phase C were it to come into contact with
|>> the ground?
|>>
|>> Whereas the service transformer on phase AB has the only centered
|>> tapped (neutral) windings 120V phase-to-neutral and 240V
|>> phase-to-phase and phase C (not connected to the phase AB transformer)
|>> is the wild phase.
|>>
|>> It seems to me that (without additional protective equipment), if
|>> phase C accidently touches the ground there would be a voltage
|>> imbalance, but the overcurrent protection would not necessarily trip
|>> off.
|>>
|>> Am I wrong by assuming this?
|>>
|>> Also, what, in general, are the pros and cons of a 120/240V 3 phase
|>> closed delta connection?
|>>
|>> Is this a good choice for a small commercial building with a 3 story
|>> hydraulic elevator and mostly 120V. appliance and lighting loads?
|>>
|>> Beachcomber
|>
|>
|>The protective device will trip if phase C is grounded, just as for the
|>other phases. The delta system will not allow full utilization of the
|>available kVA, since one phase can not be used for the single-phase loads.
|>With mostly 120V lighting & appliances, I would go 208/120 4-wire wye, so
|>you get the benefit of all three phases for the 120V loads. Run the
|>elevators & A/C on 208 3-phase.
|>
|>
|>Benjamin D Miller, PE
|>www.bmillerengineering.com
|>
|
| I have only seen center tapped "closed delta" a few times, notably in
| the alley next to the Hog's Breath Salloon in Key West (look at the
| pole behind the stage) and I bet from the looks of it they added the
| 3d transformer as the load increased. Usually it is "open delta" with
| 2 transformers as a cheap way to get some 3 phase to a customer who
| has mostly single phase loads.
| The open delta was actually pretty popular in the light industrial
| areas of East Naples (Florida).

I've seen a few setups with one big fat transformer and one small one.
Usually, the big one has 2 bushings and the small one has 1 bushing.
On the secondary, the big one has 3 wired lugs and the small one has
only 2 wired lugs. I'm guessing these are arranged as Scott-T. Where
I have seen these is in business (not industrial) areas of small towns
in West Virginia and Ohio, usually servicing stores or restaurants.
Some of those smaller pole pigs were the smallest pole pigs I've seen.
My guess is the smallest ones were no more than 3 or 5 kVA.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-12-1150@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

gfretwell@aol.com

2008-02-12, 5:25 pm

On 12 Feb 2008 18:07:12 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:

>| I have only seen center tapped "closed delta" a few times, notably in
>| the alley next to the Hog's Breath Salloon in Key West (look at the
>| pole behind the stage) and I bet from the looks of it they added the
>| 3d transformer as the load increased. Usually it is "open delta" with
>| 2 transformers as a cheap way to get some 3 phase to a customer who
>| has mostly single phase loads.
>| The open delta was actually pretty popular in the light industrial
>| areas of East Naples (Florida).
>
>I've seen a few setups with one big fat transformer and one small one.
>Usually, the big one has 2 bushings and the small one has 1 bushing.
>On the secondary, the big one has 3 wired lugs and the small one has
>only 2 wired lugs. I'm guessing these are arranged as Scott-T. Where
>I have seen these is in business (not industrial) areas of small towns
>in West Virginia and Ohio, usually servicing stores or restaurants.
>Some of those smaller pole pigs were the smallest pole pigs I've seen.
>My guess is the smallest ones were no more than 3 or 5 kVA.

The two transfomer delta around here is just 2 of the expected 3 in
true delta. They connect A to C and leave B floating off of the AB
transformer that is center tapped. As long as you have a well balanced
3 phase load it works fine. We did get in trouble in the computer biz
since we had some single phase loads derived from the incoming 3 phase
inside the machine. I have had to juggle machines around or "roll the
phases" to balance the phase loads.

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-12, 5:25 pm

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:37:13 -0500 gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
| On 12 Feb 2008 18:07:12 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|
|>| I have only seen center tapped "closed delta" a few times, notably in
|>| the alley next to the Hog's Breath Salloon in Key West (look at the
|>| pole behind the stage) and I bet from the looks of it they added the
|>| 3d transformer as the load increased. Usually it is "open delta" with
|>| 2 transformers as a cheap way to get some 3 phase to a customer who
|>| has mostly single phase loads.
|>| The open delta was actually pretty popular in the light industrial
|>| areas of East Naples (Florida).
|>
|>I've seen a few setups with one big fat transformer and one small one.
|>Usually, the big one has 2 bushings and the small one has 1 bushing.
|>On the secondary, the big one has 3 wired lugs and the small one has
|>only 2 wired lugs. I'm guessing these are arranged as Scott-T. Where
|>I have seen these is in business (not industrial) areas of small towns
|>in West Virginia and Ohio, usually servicing stores or restaurants.
|>Some of those smaller pole pigs were the smallest pole pigs I've seen.
|>My guess is the smallest ones were no more than 3 or 5 kVA.
|
| The two transfomer delta around here is just 2 of the expected 3 in
| true delta. They connect A to C and leave B floating off of the AB
| transformer that is center tapped. As long as you have a well balanced
| 3 phase load it works fine. We did get in trouble in the computer biz
| since we had some single phase loads derived from the incoming 3 phase
| inside the machine. I have had to juggle machines around or "roll the
| phases" to balance the phase loads.

What I wonder is how 240 volt L-L loads would do with either the closed or
open 240D/120 systems, when connected between the high-leg and either pole
of the 120/240 side. Consider the simple 240 volt water heater, assuming
it treats both wires as hot, which it must in USA single phase systems.
Also consider a computer PSU that has two-pole switching and can handle
a 230 volt German Schuko that has no polarity to it (e.g. either wire it
gets from being plugged in could be the hot). I do remember reading some
power utility requirements that nothing but three phase loads is allowed
to connect to the high-leg. But what is the effect of doing so?

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-12-1505@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Beachcomber

2008-02-12, 5:25 pm

>What I wonder is how 240 volt L-L loads would do with either the closed or
>open 240D/120 systems, when connected between the high-leg and either pole
>of the 120/240 side. Consider the simple 240 volt water heater, assuming
>it treats both wires as hot, which it must in USA single phase systems.
>Also consider a computer PSU that has two-pole switching and can handle
>a 230 volt German Schuko that has no polarity to it (e.g. either wire it
>gets from being plugged in could be the hot). I do remember reading some
>power utility requirements that nothing but three phase loads is allowed
>to connect to the high-leg. But what is the effect of doing so?
>

I'm wondering if the simplicity of a single phase 240/120 V service
for a small elevator building is in some way superior to the slightly
more complex 3 phase- 208/120 V. wye service.

Can a small hydraulic passenger elevator serving a maximum of 3 flloor
run OK on a 240 V. single phase circuit? If wired the other way, this
would probably be the only 3 phase load.

My concern with the 3 phase is that if the utility loses a phase, a
208V 3 phase motor will stop rotating and burn up (without special
protection). I've seen this happen in a condo building. Also,
because of the partially powered delta-wye at the transformer and some
of the 120 V lines might go to something like 68 V or so.

I know that there are probably protective devices that can be
installed to protect this. I wonder though, if it might just be
better to stick with a 120/240 V. single phase service.

Any thoughts?

Beachcomber

gfretwell@aol.com

2008-02-12, 5:25 pm

On 12 Feb 2008 21:09:22 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:

>What I wonder is how 240 volt L-L loads would do with either the closed or
>open 240D/120 systems, when connected between the high-leg and either pole
>of the 120/240 side.

It alters the voltage between the phases if you have a L/L across the
missing leg it will drag down that voltage

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-12, 5:25 pm

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:37:32 GMT Beachcomber <invalid@notreal.none> wrote:

|>What I wonder is how 240 volt L-L loads would do with either the closed or
|>open 240D/120 systems, when connected between the high-leg and either pole
|>of the 120/240 side. Consider the simple 240 volt water heater, assuming
|>it treats both wires as hot, which it must in USA single phase systems.
|>Also consider a computer PSU that has two-pole switching and can handle
|>a 230 volt German Schuko that has no polarity to it (e.g. either wire it
|>gets from being plugged in could be the hot). I do remember reading some
|>power utility requirements that nothing but three phase loads is allowed
|>to connect to the high-leg. But what is the effect of doing so?
|>
|
| I'm wondering if the simplicity of a single phase 240/120 V service
| for a small elevator building is in some way superior to the slightly
| more complex 3 phase- 208/120 V. wye service.

It would be simpler. For a small building it can be OK. For a larger
building, the utility would want more balance in the phase loading.

One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three secondary
windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What you get are
SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label the phase wires
going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three phase systems from
this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be 208Y/120. And you can
have 3 single phase systems from this, connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F.
Divide the tenants that get single phase three equal ways and this way
they get genuine 120/240. This is actually a bit more complex than the
common systems (for example you would have 3 separate distributions for
the single phase). You probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
But I'd prefer such a system, myself.

If for some reason you really need 240 volts on the threee phase loads,
that either forces the 240D/120 system, or just 240D, or a 240Y/139 system
just for three phase.

Ultimately, I'd prefer to have 3 120/240 volt systems plus 480Y/277 for
the three phase loads.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-12-1648@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Ben Miller

2008-02-12, 8:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
> One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three
> secondary windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What
> you get are SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label
> the phase wires going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three
> phase systems from this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be
> 208Y/120. And you can have 3 single phase systems from this,
> connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F. Divide the tenants that get single
> phase three equal ways and this way they get genuine 120/240. This
> is actually a bit more complex than the common systems (for example
> you would have 3 separate distributions for the single phase). You
> probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
> But I'd prefer such a system, myself.
>

I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps of
three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow up the
transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same windings?

--
Benjamin D Miller, PE
www.bmillerengineering.com

Ben Miller

2008-02-12, 8:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>
> I've seen a few setups with one big fat transformer and one small one.
> Usually, the big one has 2 bushings and the small one has 1 bushing.
> On the secondary, the big one has 3 wired lugs and the small one has
> only 2 wired lugs. I'm guessing these are arranged as Scott-T. Where
> I have seen these is in business (not industrial) areas of small towns
> in West Virginia and Ohio, usually servicing stores or restaurants.
> Some of those smaller pole pigs were the smallest pole pigs I've seen.
> My guess is the smallest ones were no more than 3 or 5 kVA.
>

They could also be an open delta, where most of the load is single-phase.
The big one is center tapped, and handles all of the 120V loads. The small
one only handles three-phase loads, perhaps a roof top A/C unit. I saw this
exact setup at a factory that was having problems with one of their VFD's.
The voltage imbalance was terrible. We brought in a genset and proved that
the power system was to blame. When the system was originally installed, the
building was a warehouse with only an A/C unit on the three-phase, so it
worked great. Nobody thought to check it when the manufacturing equipment
moved in with heavy three-phase loads.

--
Benjamin D Miller, PE
www.bmillerengineering.com

Don Kelly

2008-02-13, 3:25 am

----------------------------
"Ben Miller" <Ben@somewhere> wrote in message
news:13r4guma8q3rq69@corp.supernews.com...
> phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>
> I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps of
> three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow up
> the transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same
> windings?
>
>
>
> --
> Benjamin D Miller, PE
> www.bmillerengineering.com

He is essentially describing a 6 phase secondary. Each 120 to neutral and
separated by 60 degrees but you can get 240 between the legs that are 180
degrees apart. as well as 208 between the legs that are 120 degrees apart.
So you can have 2 -120/208V Ysystems with common neutral as well as 3
120/240V single phase circuits as well as some 120V D with one terminal
tied to neutral.

There is no real advantage but the chance of problems with mixed up wiring
will be increased.

The question then arises- why bother?
--

Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-13, 3:25 am

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:11:46 -0600 Ben Miller <Ben@somewhere> wrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|> One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three
|> secondary windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What
|> you get are SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label
|> the phase wires going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three
|> phase systems from this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be
|> 208Y/120. And you can have 3 single phase systems from this,
|> connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F. Divide the tenants that get single
|> phase three equal ways and this way they get genuine 120/240. This
|> is actually a bit more complex than the common systems (for example
|> you would have 3 separate distributions for the single phase). You
|> probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
|> But I'd prefer such a system, myself.
|>
|
| I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps of
| three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow up the
| transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same windings?

Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:

B C
\ /
\ /
A----N----D
/ \
/ \
F E

A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.

You could also get 120 volts from A-B or B-C or C-D or D-E or E-F or F-A,
but you would not want to.

You could also ignore the center tap and rewire it for 416Y/240.

If the windings can be split and wired in parallel, you could rewire it
for 208Y/120 with double the amperage.

A transformer with dual secondary 120 volt windings on each of the three
cores would be quite flexible, being able to be configured for any of
these three systems (but you would have 12 wires coming off the cores on
the secondary side).

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-12-2328@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

gfretwell@aol.com

2008-02-13, 3:25 am

On 13 Feb 2008 05:46:10 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:11:46 -0600 Ben Miller <Ben@somewhere> wrote:
>| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>|> One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three
>|> secondary windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What
>|> you get are SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label
>|> the phase wires going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three
>|> phase systems from this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be
>|> 208Y/120. And you can have 3 single phase systems from this,
>|> connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F. Divide the tenants that get single
>|> phase three equal ways and this way they get genuine 120/240. This
>|> is actually a bit more complex than the common systems (for example
>|> you would have 3 separate distributions for the single phase). You
>|> probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
>|> But I'd prefer such a system, myself.
>|>
>|
>| I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps of
>| three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow up the
>| transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same windings?
>
>Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:
>
> B C
> \ /
> \ /
>A----N----D
> / \
> / \
> F E
>
>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.
>
>You could also get 120 volts from A-B or B-C or C-D or D-E or E-F or F-A,
>but you would not want to.
>
>You could also ignore the center tap and rewire it for 416Y/240.
>
>If the windings can be split and wired in parallel, you could rewire it
>for 208Y/120 with double the amperage.
>
>A transformer with dual secondary 120 volt windings on each of the three
>cores would be quite flexible, being able to be configured for any of
>these three systems (but you would have 12 wires coming off the cores on
>the secondary side).

I agree with Mr Kelly

They use delta vee to save money, why would they do this 6 pole thing?

Michael Moroney

2008-02-13, 1:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:

>Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:

> B C
> \ /
> \ /
>A----N----D
> / \
> / \
> F E

>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.

I always wondered if either any electric company offered such a service,
or if there was any such thing as a breaker panel that would support it.
I strongly suspect the answer to both is an absolute No Way, esp. if
you think about how the heck you'd design the panel. You'd have to invent
nonstandard breakers that would do lots of skipping to be useful. Of
course such a service would really be useful only in an apartment building
where there would be multiple standard panels, mostly residential split
phase (1/3 A-D 1/3 B-E 1/3 C-F) and a 3 phase panel for elevator service,
so no need for an actual panel for this 7 wire service.

Michael Moroney

2008-02-13, 1:25 pm

invalid@notreal.none (Beachcomber) writes:

>I'm wondering if the simplicity of a single phase 240/120 V service
>for a small elevator building is in some way superior to the slightly
>more complex 3 phase- 208/120 V. wye service.

>Can a small hydraulic passenger elevator serving a maximum of 3 flloor
>run OK on a 240 V. single phase circuit? If wired the other way, this
>would probably be the only 3 phase load.

Do the elevator companies even offer a single phase elevator system in
the size you need? (how many HP is such an elevator motor). Since
the system has to control the motor, possibly reversing it, you may
not be able to simply replace the motor with a single phase motor.

Do you have a need for 240V (not 208V) residential devices? If not,
there's no real advantage of 240V delta or open delta over standard
208Y/120 service. The only real place I see where 240V delta has a place
is residential service with a small 3 phase load, such as a workshop or
large A/C unit. That's simply because homes have 240V and 120/240V single
phase appliances.

I have seen open delta 3 phase in residential areas of Baton Rouge LA for
whole house A/C. 1 large and one tiny transformer.

Michael Moroney

2008-02-13, 1:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:

>What I wonder is how 240 volt L-L loads would do with either the closed or
>open 240D/120 systems, when connected between the high-leg and either pole
>of the 120/240 side. Consider the simple 240 volt water heater, assuming
>it treats both wires as hot, which it must in USA single phase systems.

I would assume no effect, as long as the insulation was rated for 208VAC
to ground vs. 120VAC to ground, and you don't overload the possibly small
high leg transformer. The insulation won't be an issue for anything
designed for European use where either leg may be hot, since either leg
must handle 240V. One overload problem is when something is connected
across the missing leg of an open delta system. The transformers have to
deal with a higher VA per delivered watt, plus more copper losses.
Combine this with a small high leg transformer and you may see voltage
sag.

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-13, 5:25 pm

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:54:04 GMT Don Kelly <dhky@shaw.ca> wrote:
| ----------------------------
| "Ben Miller" <Ben@somewhere> wrote in message
| news:13r4guma8q3rq69@corp.supernews.com...
|> phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|>> One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three
|>> secondary windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What
|>> you get are SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label
|>> the phase wires going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three
|>> phase systems from this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be
|>> 208Y/120. And you can have 3 single phase systems from this,
|>> connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F. Divide the tenants that get single
|>> phase three equal ways and this way they get genuine 120/240. This
|>> is actually a bit more complex than the common systems (for example
|>> you would have 3 separate distributions for the single phase). You
|>> probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
|>> But I'd prefer such a system, myself.
|>>
|>
|> I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps of
|> three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow up
|> the transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same
|> windings?
|>
|>
|>
|> --
|> Benjamin D Miller, PE
|> www.bmillerengineering.com
|
| He is essentially describing a 6 phase secondary. Each 120 to neutral and
| separated by 60 degrees but you can get 240 between the legs that are 180
| degrees apart. as well as 208 between the legs that are 120 degrees apart.
| So you can have 2 -120/208V Ysystems with common neutral as well as 3
| 120/240V single phase circuits as well as some 120V D with one terminal
| tied to neutral.
|
| There is no real advantage but the chance of problems with mixed up wiring
| will be increased.

The advantage as I see it is the combination of keeping loading balanced
(for a large building) and having genuine 240 volts. I would divide up
such a building into 3 segments and feed only one phase to each. So the
mixed up wiring risk would only be from the transformer out to each of
the 3 single phase main panels. I've never actually seen a transformer
like that on the market. If it came down to it, I'd just do it with 3
separate single phase transformers. I am rather adamant about getting
genuine 120/240 to any and all residential units. If the utility says
they need to have the phases balanced more that a single phase drop would
allow (in a big building, I would expect that), I'll suggest the "6 phase"
answer, either externally or internally (via 480 perhaps). That is, if I
ever get into the landlord business (not too likely).

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-13-1554@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-13, 5:25 pm

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:05:22 -0500 gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
| On 13 Feb 2008 05:46:10 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|
|>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:11:46 -0600 Ben Miller <Ben@somewhere> wrote:
|>| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|>|> One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three
|>|> secondary windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What
|>|> you get are SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label
|>|> the phase wires going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three
|>|> phase systems from this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be
|>|> 208Y/120. And you can have 3 single phase systems from this,
|>|> connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F. Divide the tenants that get single
|>|> phase three equal ways and this way they get genuine 120/240. This
|>|> is actually a bit more complex than the common systems (for example
|>|> you would have 3 separate distributions for the single phase). You
|>|> probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
|>|> But I'd prefer such a system, myself.
|>|>
|>|
|>| I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps of
|>| three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow up the
|>| transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same windings?
|>
|>Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:
|>
|> B C
|> \ /
|> \ /
|>A----N----D
|> / \
|> / \
|> F E
|>
|>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
|>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
|>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
|>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
|>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
|>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.
|>
|>You could also get 120 volts from A-B or B-C or C-D or D-E or E-F or F-A,
|>but you would not want to.
|>
|>You could also ignore the center tap and rewire it for 416Y/240.
|>
|>If the windings can be split and wired in parallel, you could rewire it
|>for 208Y/120 with double the amperage.
|>
|>A transformer with dual secondary 120 volt windings on each of the three
|>cores would be quite flexible, being able to be configured for any of
|>these three systems (but you would have 12 wires coming off the cores on
|>the secondary side).
|
| I agree with Mr Kelly
|
| They use delta vee to save money, why would they do this 6 pole thing?

To serve a lot of 120/240 volt single phase loads AND keep phases balanced?
It might depend on how large a building is involved. Suppose it is a 10
floor building with 9 floors that have 12 residential apartments, each.
Would you in the role of a utility engineer be satisified running single
phase service into that building? I would think not. Then would delta
with only one side having all the 120/240 loads really be any better?
What I would ultimately propose for such a project would be to bring in
480Y/277 to the building, run that to the elevators, and put single
phase transformers on floors 3 (serving 2-4), 6 (serving 5-7) and 9
(serving 8-10), fed from diverse 480 volt connections (480 to 120/240
volt single phase dry transformers are pretty common). Various outside
HID lights could also be fed from the 277 volts.

The risk of mixing the wiring with 6 phases is probably realistic. But
isn't that what color marking of conductors is for? Besides, the only
places to get that mixed up is between a common single transformer and
the place where the phases split into 3 sets of single phase. If this
concept had been chosen a long time ago and been an accepted standard,
I'm sure we would have a color code standard, now, for each phase angle.

If anyone does make a three phase transformer that could be wired for
either 208Y/120 or 416Y/240, my bet is someone with the know-how could
wire it for the scheme I suggested (although it might not have enough
outgoing terminal lugs, or enough conduit space, to do it).

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-13-1600@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Ben Miller

2008-02-13, 5:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:[color=darkred]
> Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:
>
> B C
> \ /
> \ /
> A----N----D
> / \
> / \
> F E
>
> A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both
> wound on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third
> core. A third of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A
> third of the 120/240 loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of
> the 120/240 loads would be served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120
> loads would be served from A,C,E and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads
> would be served from B,D,F and N.
>
> You could also get 120 volts from A-B or B-C or C-D or D-E or E-F or
> F-A, but you would not want to.
>
> You could also ignore the center tap and rewire it for 416Y/240.
>
> If the windings can be split and wired in parallel, you could rewire
> it for 208Y/120 with double the amperage.
>
> A transformer with dual secondary 120 volt windings on each of the
> three cores would be quite flexible, being able to be configured for
> any of these three systems (but you would have 12 wires coming off
> the cores on the secondary side).
>

Got it. Thanks. It was the "center tap" that threw me. It is really 6
windings in a star configuration.

--
Benjamin D Miller, PE
www.bmillerengineering.com

Don Kelly

2008-02-14, 3:25 am

----------------------------
<phil-news-nospam@ipal.net> wrote in message
news:fovqah02hfi@news2.newsguy.com...
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:05:22 -0500 gfretwell@aol.com wrote:
> | On 13 Feb 2008 05:46:10 GMT, phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
> |
> |>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:11:46 -0600 Ben Miller <Ben@somewhere> wrote:
> |>| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
> |>|> One option is to use a three phase transformer where all three
> |>|> secondary windings are 240 volt center tapped to 120/240 volts. What
> |>|> you get are SIX separate hot phase wires, and a neutral. I'll label
> |>|> the phase wires going clockwise as A,B,C,D,E,F. You can have 2 three
> |>|> phase systems from this, connecting to A,C,E or B,D,F. They would be
> |>|> 208Y/120. And you can have 3 single phase systems from this,
> |>|> connecting to A,D and B,E and C,F. Divide the tenants that get single
> |>|> phase three equal ways and this way they get genuine 120/240. This
> |>|> is actually a bit more complex than the common systems (for example
> |>|> you would have 3 separate distributions for the single phase). You
> |>|> probably can't meter the whole thing at once.
> |>|> But I'd prefer such a system, myself.
> |>|>
> |>|
> |>| I am obviously missing something. How do you connect the center taps
> of
> |>| three windings together, and then connect them in a wye, and not blow
> up the
> |>| transformer? And how do you get 240/120 & 208Y/120 from the same
> windings?
> |>
> |>Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:
> |>
> |> B C
> |> \ /
> |> \ /
> |>A----N----D
> |> / \
> |> / \
> |> F E
> |>
> |>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both
> wound
> |>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A
> third
> |>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
> |>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
> |>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from
> A,C,E
> |>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.
> |>
> |>You could also get 120 volts from A-B or B-C or C-D or D-E or E-F or
> F-A,
> |>but you would not want to.
> |>
> |>You could also ignore the center tap and rewire it for 416Y/240.
> |>
> |>If the windings can be split and wired in parallel, you could rewire it
> |>for 208Y/120 with double the amperage.
> |>
> |>A transformer with dual secondary 120 volt windings on each of the three
> |>cores would be quite flexible, being able to be configured for any of
> |>these three systems (but you would have 12 wires coming off the cores on
> |>the secondary side).
> |
> | I agree with Mr Kelly
> |
> | They use delta vee to save money, why would they do this 6 pole thing?
>
> To serve a lot of 120/240 volt single phase loads AND keep phases
> balanced?
> It might depend on how large a building is involved. Suppose it is a 10
> floor building with 9 floors that have 12 residential apartments, each.
> Would you in the role of a utility engineer be satisified running single
> phase service into that building? I would think not. Then would delta
> with only one side having all the 120/240 loads really be any better?
> What I would ultimately propose for such a project would be to bring in
> 480Y/277 to the building, run that to the elevators, and put single
> phase transformers on floors 3 (serving 2-4), 6 (serving 5-7) and 9
> (serving 8-10), fed from diverse 480 volt connections (480 to 120/240
> volt single phase dry transformers are pretty common). Various outside
> HID lights could also be fed from the 277 volts.
>
> The risk of mixing the wiring with 6 phases is probably realistic. But
> isn't that what color marking of conductors is for? Besides, the only
> places to get that mixed up is between a common single transformer and
> the place where the phases split into 3 sets of single phase. If this
> concept had been chosen a long time ago and been an accepted standard,
> I'm sure we would have a color code standard, now, for each phase angle.
>
> If anyone does make a three phase transformer that could be wired for
> either 208Y/120 or 416Y/240, my bet is someone with the know-how could
> wire it for the scheme I suggested (although it might not have enough
> outgoing terminal lugs, or enough conduit space, to do it).

The "6 phase " scheme wouldn't cost any more in terms of the transformers
and could be done using a bank of 3 single phase pole pigs. However, it
would appear that there would be additional costs involved with no net gain
as well as a more complex system. Where possible one should avoid adding
complexity (KISS). This doesn't mean that it can't be done but may mean
that it shouldn't be done.
There has been some playing around in the past on the basis that 3 phase is
good so maybe 6 or 12 phase is better- tain't so except in some special
cases.
Where 6 phase has been used is in some urban distribution where there is a
savings in terms of space necessary at a given line to neutral voltage
because the line to line voltage between adjacent phases is then the same as
to neutral. Whether this is still being done is something that I don't know.
It also has been used for rectifier supplies in order to reduce harmonics
and ripple.

Your scheme of 480Y and single phase transformers is far better.
--

Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
remove the X to answer

>
> --
> |---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
> | Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below
> |
> | first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-13-1600@ipal.net
> |
> |------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Beachcomber

2008-02-14, 3:25 am

>
>
>I always wondered if either any electric company offered such a service,
>or if there was any such thing as a breaker panel that would support it.

Are we not forgetting about the primary windings for such a scheme?

For three phase, the textbooks say that wye-wye is not used because
of undesirable harmonics in the neutral. Would that not apple also to
this six phase scheme?

How would the primaries be connected then?

Also, doesn't six phase distribution mean six phase transmission? Six
phase transmission for any distance is going to be horrorendously
expensive just to keep a few apartment buildings at 120/240 V.

Beachcomber

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:44:25 GMT Don Kelly <dhky@shaw.ca> wrote:

| The "6 phase " scheme wouldn't cost any more in terms of the transformers
| and could be done using a bank of 3 single phase pole pigs. However, it
| would appear that there would be additional costs involved with no net gain
| as well as a more complex system. Where possible one should avoid adding
| complexity (KISS). This doesn't mean that it can't be done but may mean
| that it shouldn't be done.

So what would you have instead, keeping to the requirement of genuine
240 volts at the single phase circuits?

| There has been some playing around in the past on the basis that 3 phase is
| good so maybe 6 or 12 phase is better- tain't so except in some special
| cases.
| Where 6 phase has been used is in some urban distribution where there is a
| savings in terms of space necessary at a given line to neutral voltage
| because the line to line voltage between adjacent phases is then the same as
| to neutral. Whether this is still being done is something that I don't know.
| It also has been used for rectifier supplies in order to reduce harmonics
| and ripple.

I've wondered if any of those 6-wire transmission lines might be phased
this way, even if the loads end up being split at the far end.

| Your scheme of 480Y and single phase transformers is far better.

So that's the way you would go? What if the utility says they don't want
to have the loss of an extra set of transformers with MV -> 480 -> 120/240
and insist on no more than one transformer per MV -> meter path?

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1211@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:
|
|>Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:
|
|> B C
|> \ /
|> \ /
|>A----N----D
|> / \
|> / \
|> F E
|
|>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
|>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
|>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
|>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
|>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
|>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.
|
| I always wondered if either any electric company offered such a service,
| or if there was any such thing as a breaker panel that would support it.
| I strongly suspect the answer to both is an absolute No Way, esp. if
| you think about how the heck you'd design the panel. You'd have to invent
| nonstandard breakers that would do lots of skipping to be useful. Of
| course such a service would really be useful only in an apartment building
| where there would be multiple standard panels, mostly residential split
| phase (1/3 A-D 1/3 B-E 1/3 C-F) and a 3 phase panel for elevator service,
| so no need for an actual panel for this 7 wire service.

I have seen 6-pole disconnects, presumably intended for large motor control.
But I have seen them up to 600 volt 400 amp. That's a huge motor.

A 6 phase panel is just too bizarre.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1216@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:54:13 GMT Beachcomber <invalid@notreal.none> wrote:
|
|>> B C
|>> \ /
|>> \ /
|>>A----N----D
|>> / \
|>> / \
|>> F E
|>
|>>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
|>>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
|>>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
|>>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
|>>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
|>>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.
|>
|>I always wondered if either any electric company offered such a service,
|>or if there was any such thing as a breaker panel that would support it.
|
| Are we not forgetting about the primary windings for such a scheme?
|
| For three phase, the textbooks say that wye-wye is not used because
| of undesirable harmonics in the neutral. Would that not apple also to
| this six phase scheme?

Nothing about this scheme prevents a delta primary.

Of course, if you want to backfeed power for credit into the utility,
you might need a wye-wye anyway.

| How would the primaries be connected then?

Delta.

| Also, doesn't six phase distribution mean six phase transmission? Six
| phase transmission for any distance is going to be horrorendously
| expensive just to keep a few apartment buildings at 120/240 V.

This would be a traditional E-core transformer. The primaries would be a
winding on each bar of the E-core at 480 volts (for example) and wired in
the traditional delta configuration. The secondaries would be a pair of
120 volt windings. You can wire the 120 volt windings in parallel for a
traditional 480D -> 208Y/120 transformer. You can wire those same 120 volt
windings in series for the somewhat unusual 480D -> 416Y/240 (military has
generators for 416Y/240 and might have to do just that in the case they
get a 480 volt power source instead). That series wiring could be used
with the center tap of each secondary connected to neutral instead of one
end, to make the 6 phase arrangement.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1219@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:56:26 -0600 Ben Miller <Ben@somewhere> wrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|> Maybe an ASCII art picture will help:
|>
|> B C
|> \ /
|> \ /
|> A----N----D
|> / \
|> / \
|> F E
|>
|> A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both
|> wound on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third
|> core. A third of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A
|> third of the 120/240 loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of
|> the 120/240 loads would be served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120
|> loads would be served from A,C,E and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads
|> would be served from B,D,F and N.
|>
|> You could also get 120 volts from A-B or B-C or C-D or D-E or E-F or
|> F-A, but you would not want to.
|>
|> You could also ignore the center tap and rewire it for 416Y/240.
|>
|> If the windings can be split and wired in parallel, you could rewire
|> it for 208Y/120 with double the amperage.
|>
|> A transformer with dual secondary 120 volt windings on each of the
|> three cores would be quite flexible, being able to be configured for
|> any of these three systems (but you would have 12 wires coming off
|> the cores on the secondary side).
|>
|>> ---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
|>> Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address
|>> below | first name lower case at ipal.net /
|>> spamtrap-2008-02-12-2328@ipal.net |
|>> ------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|
|
|
| Got it. Thanks. It was the "center tap" that threw me. It is really 6
| windings in a star configuration.

If you have a common single phase 480 volt transformer with a pair of 120
volt windings that can be wired in parallel or series, I suppose you would
call that a 2 winding secondary. But what if the windings are just tapped
in the center and cannot be separated for parallel wiring? Would you still
call that a 2 windings secondary? Either kind of winding could be used on
each bar of the E-core to make the 240/208/120 6 point star configuration.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1224@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
| invalid@notreal.none (Beachcomber) writes:
|
|>I'm wondering if the simplicity of a single phase 240/120 V service
|>for a small elevator building is in some way superior to the slightly
|>more complex 3 phase- 208/120 V. wye service.
|
|>Can a small hydraulic passenger elevator serving a maximum of 3 flloor
|>run OK on a 240 V. single phase circuit? If wired the other way, this
|>would probably be the only 3 phase load.
|
| Do the elevator companies even offer a single phase elevator system in
| the size you need? (how many HP is such an elevator motor). Since
| the system has to control the motor, possibly reversing it, you may
| not be able to simply replace the motor with a single phase motor.
|
| Do you have a need for 240V (not 208V) residential devices? If not,

Yes.

| there's no real advantage of 240V delta or open delta over standard
| 208Y/120 service. The only real place I see where 240V delta has a place
| is residential service with a small 3 phase load, such as a workshop or
| large A/C unit. That's simply because homes have 240V and 120/240V single
| phase appliances.

As do condos in very large buildings where not all big appliances are
provided as part of the condo arrangement.

Suppose you buy a condo with 208Y/120 service, of which you get 2 lines
of that. It has appliances included in the sale because the developer
bought special 208 volt versions. You live there a few years and one of
them fails and you need to buy a replacement. Go to Sears or some place
like that and ask for 208 volt versions as if you were in this situation
and see how easy it is.

Some modern ranges could easily handle 200 to 240 volts by means using a
thermostat that manges the heat even so that at 208 volts there are some
times the element goes off to maintain the correct temperature. It would
be on for 208 volts more than for 240 volts.

| I have seen open delta 3 phase in residential areas of Baton Rouge LA for
| whole house A/C. 1 large and one tiny transformer.

I'm sure when A/C systems started showing up, with many using 3-phase, they
were among the first to get them down in the very hot south.

I wonder how many of those big+little transformer setups were Scott-T instead.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1230@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:

| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:
|
|>What I wonder is how 240 volt L-L loads would do with either the closed or
|>open 240D/120 systems, when connected between the high-leg and either pole
|>of the 120/240 side. Consider the simple 240 volt water heater, assuming
|>it treats both wires as hot, which it must in USA single phase systems.
|
| I would assume no effect, as long as the insulation was rated for 208VAC
| to ground vs. 120VAC to ground, and you don't overload the possibly small
| high leg transformer. The insulation won't be an issue for anything
| designed for European use where either leg may be hot, since either leg
| must handle 240V. One overload problem is when something is connected
| across the missing leg of an open delta system. The transformers have to
| deal with a higher VA per delivered watt, plus more copper losses.
| Combine this with a small high leg transformer and you may see voltage
| sag.

Would a computer overload it?

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1238@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

Ben Miller

2008-02-14, 1:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:[color=darkred]
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:56:26 -0600 Ben Miller <Ben@somewhere> wrote:
>
> If you have a common single phase 480 volt transformer with a pair of
> 120 volt windings that can be wired in parallel or series, I suppose
> you would call that a 2 winding secondary. But what if the windings
> are just tapped in the center and cannot be separated for parallel
> wiring? Would you still call that a 2 windings secondary? Either
> kind of winding could be used on each bar of the E-core to make the
> 240/208/120 6 point star configuration.
>

Phil
I agree. I had something else in my mind. Maybe just reading posts too late
at night!

--
Benjamin D Miller, PE
www.bmillerengineering.com

Michael Moroney

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

invalid@notreal.none (Beachcomber) writes:

[color=darkred]
>Are we not forgetting about the primary windings for such a scheme?

Wye or delta, whatever is standard for a 3 phase transformer bank on the
distribution system servicing this.

> For three phase, the textbooks say that wye-wye is not used because
>of undesirable harmonics in the neutral. Would that not apple also to
>this six phase scheme?

I don't know about that. Around here, nearly every 3 pole pig transformer
bank is wired wye-wye. I don't know what's on the inside of pad
transformers or the single can 3 phase pole pigs.

Also, this scheme is as much 6 phase as your home service is 2 phase.
A standard 3 wire+N 3 phase primary system is all that's needed for the
3 transformers.

>Also, doesn't six phase distribution mean six phase transmission?

No.

> Six
>phase transmission for any distance is going to be horrorendously
>expensive just to keep a few apartment buildings at 120/240 V.

Michael Moroney

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:

>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:

>|
>| I would assume no effect, as long as the insulation was rated for 208VAC
>| to ground vs. 120VAC to ground, and you don't overload the possibly small
>| high leg transformer. The insulation won't be an issue for anything
>| designed for European use where either leg may be hot, since either leg
>| must handle 240V. One overload problem is when something is connected
>| across the missing leg of an open delta system. The transformers have to
>| deal with a higher VA per delivered watt, plus more copper losses.
>| Combine this with a small high leg transformer and you may see voltage
>| sag.

>Would a computer overload it?

What do you mean by "computer"? A PC or a big-assed old mainframe?
I seriously doubt a PC with a 400W power supply will overload a high leg
transformer of a few kVA.

Michael Moroney

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:

>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:

>| Do you have a need for 240V (not 208V) residential devices? If not,

>Yes.

I was asking the original poster who was wondering about getting 240V
delta or open delta service for a small building with an elevator.

>| there's no real advantage of 240V delta or open delta over standard
>| 208Y/120 service. The only real place I see where 240V delta has a place
>| is residential service with a small 3 phase load, such as a workshop or
>| large A/C unit. That's simply because homes have 240V and 120/240V single
>| phase appliances.

>As do condos in very large buildings where not all big appliances are
>provided as part of the condo arrangement.

[snip explanation why you'd want 120/240V service in a condo)

I agree that 120/240V service should always be supplied for residential
service.

I'll amend my earlier answer to say if the configuration is a small
apartment building small enough to power all the residences off a single
transformer providing 120V/240V service, an open delta to provide for an
elevator or other small 3 phase load would be appropiate.

>| I have seen open delta 3 phase in residential areas of Baton Rouge LA for
>| whole house A/C. 1 large and one tiny transformer.

>I'm sure when A/C systems started showing up, with many using 3-phase, they
>were among the first to get them down in the very hot south.

>I wonder how many of those big+little transformer setups were Scott-T instead.

I was real curious what was going on in the Baton Rouge case so I did
study the wiring enough to figure out it was open delta. I don't think
I've ever seen a Scott-T type setup using two pole pigs.

I take that back, sort of.

One weird setup I've seen, and I'm not totally sure exactly what it is:
1 large 3 phase transformer (single can) with a small transformer can
below it on a pole. The small transformer has NO MV connection nor even a
MV bushing! It sits below the drops to the homes/businesses. The only
thing I can think it could be is the big can is 240V delta, and the high
leg powers the small can, with is a 208V/240VCT. The big can powers half
the residential services plus any 3 phase services, the small can powers
the other residential services. It's sort of Scott-T relative to the big
can. But this is a guess, I actually don't know how it's wired. I even
took a photo to try and figure it out. There are quite a few of these
setups in Philadelphia.

VWWall

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:

> I'm sure when A/C systems started showing up, with many using 3-phase, they
> were among the first to get them down in the very hot south.
>
> I wonder how many of those big+little transformer setups were Scott-T instead.

A Scott-T is used to get two phase from three phase. There are very few
two phase requirements any more.

Some erroneously call the 240/120V system "two phase" when it's really a
single phase with a center tap. (Or two 120V windings connected in series.)

The last time I encountered a true Scott-T was in my exam for
Professional Engineer, back in 1952.

--
Virg Wall, P.E.

Stuart

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

In article <13r9atrqppp1o39@corp.supernews.com>,
VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

> A Scott-T is used to get two phase from three phase. There are very few
> two phase requirements any more.

Often used for the filament supplies in the modulator valves on large AM
transmitters. Two seperate filaments fed from the two different phases to
reduce hum caused by modulation of the anode current due to variation of
the emmision at mains frequency.

--
Stuart Winsor

From is valid but subject to change without notice if it gets spammed.

For Barn dances and folk evenings in the Coventry and Warwickshire area
See: http://www.barndance.org.uk

Ben Miller

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> I was real curious what was going on in the Baton Rouge case so I did
> study the wiring enough to figure out it was open delta. I don't
> think I've ever seen a Scott-T type setup using two pole pigs.
>

You are not likely to see too many Scott T transformers with three-phase
supplies feeding three-phase loads, as you simply don't need them. It is far
more likely that the Large+small transformers are open delta.

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@theworld.com> wrote:

|>As do condos in very large buildings where not all big appliances are
|>provided as part of the condo arrangement.
|
| [snip explanation why you'd want 120/240V service in a condo)
|
| I agree that 120/240V service should always be supplied for residential
| service.
|
| I'll amend my earlier answer to say if the configuration is a small
| apartment building small enough to power all the residences off a single
| transformer providing 120V/240V service, an open delta to provide for an
| elevator or other small 3 phase load would be appropiate.

Or a Scott-T if the original 120/240 volt pole pig is a two-bushing type.
Then a small one bushing transformer connected to the 3rd phase would
give you the 90 degrees difference that Scott-T needs.

|>| I have seen open delta 3 phase in residential areas of Baton Rouge LA for
|>| whole house A/C. 1 large and one tiny transformer.
|
|>I'm sure when A/C systems started showing up, with many using 3-phase, they
|>were among the first to get them down in the very hot south.
|
|>I wonder how many of those big+little transformer setups were Scott-T instead.
|
| I was real curious what was going on in the Baton Rouge case so I did
| study the wiring enough to figure out it was open delta. I don't think
| I've ever seen a Scott-T type setup using two pole pigs.

What you would see in a Scott-T is that one transformer, preferrably the
big one, would have 2 bushings, and the other would have 1 bushing. Each
of the bushings would be connected to separate MV phases to get the 90
degree phase relationship.

| I take that back, sort of.
|
| One weird setup I've seen, and I'm not totally sure exactly what it is:
| 1 large 3 phase transformer (single can) with a small transformer can
| below it on a pole. The small transformer has NO MV connection nor even a
| MV bushing! It sits below the drops to the homes/businesses. The only
| thing I can think it could be is the big can is 240V delta, and the high
| leg powers the small can, with is a 208V/240VCT. The big can powers half
| the residential services plus any 3 phase services, the small can powers
| the other residential services. It's sort of Scott-T relative to the big
| can. But this is a guess, I actually don't know how it's wired. I even
| took a photo to try and figure it out. There are quite a few of these
| setups in Philadelphia.

If the big can is already 3 phase, why would anyone need to also have a
Scott-T? That doesn't make sense. It must be something else. How many
MV bushings on each can? How many secondary lugs? While I have seen a
few single-can three phase transformers in pole pig in pictures from other
countries, I've never seen them in the USA. Pad mounts are different and
do come in big three phase tanks.

See if you can get multiple photos each at the same distance taken in a
partial circle around the transformer setup so it can be seen in 3-D by
pairing selected photos. Take them on a dismal cloudy gray overcast
day. If you have exposure setting, take a second set overexposed by 2
stops (to get more detail in the wiring itself). If using film, Tech Pan
is the best choice unless something in color provides clues.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1617@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:59:38 -0800 VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
|
|> I'm sure when A/C systems started showing up, with many using 3-phase, they
|> were among the first to get them down in the very hot south.
|>
|> I wonder how many of those big+little transformer setups were Scott-T instead.
|
| A Scott-T is used to get two phase from three phase. There are very few
| two phase requirements any more.

It can produce the equivalent of 240 delta when connected appropriately:

* * * *
/ \ / \ | /
/ \ / \ | /
/ \ / \ | /
*-------* *---*---* *---*---* *---*---*

240D 240DCT Scott-T 240VCT

What you need is 208 volts at 90 degrees, one end connected to the neutral
which is the center tap of the 120/240 single phase. The effective voltage
phasing gives the same relative voltage as the 240 delta. You get a 90
degree phase angle when one primary is connected L-L and the other is
connected L-N where the latter L is different (e.g. A-B and C-N).

| Some erroneously call the 240/120V system "two phase" when it's really a
| single phase with a center tap. (Or two 120V windings connected in series.)

Personally, I would have preferred to use the term "phase" for each of the
different vectors around the reference (generally the grounded conductor).
But that's not how things worked out. So I need to use some other term.
Often "pole" is used, but that can get confused with those big wooden sticks
that hold wires up high. I'd say "vector" but no one would understand.

| The last time I encountered a true Scott-T was in my exam for
| Professional Engineer, back in 1952.

I've found Scott-T dry-type transformers online.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1633@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

VWWall

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

Stuart wrote:
> In article <13r9atrqppp1o39@corp.supernews.com>,
> VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:
>
>
> Often used for the filament supplies in the modulator valves on large AM
> transmitters. Two seperate filaments fed from the two different phases to
> reduce hum caused by modulation of the anode current due to variation of
> the emmision at mains frequency.

Yep. That's one of the very few. I worked as a "broadcast engineer"
whilst going to college. I still have my Radio Telephone First Class
license.

There used to be a few two phase motors, but they're almost extinct.

Since you know about high power valves, do you remember the Rocky Point
effect?

Virg Wall, P.E., K6EVE

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-14, 5:25 pm

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
| phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:
|
|>On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
|
|>|
|>| I would assume no effect, as long as the insulation was rated for 208VAC
|>| to ground vs. 120VAC to ground, and you don't overload the possibly small
|>| high leg transformer. The insulation won't be an issue for anything
|>| designed for European use where either leg may be hot, since either leg
|>| must handle 240V. One overload problem is when something is connected
|>| across the missing leg of an open delta system. The transformers have to
|>| deal with a higher VA per delivered watt, plus more copper losses.
|>| Combine this with a small high leg transformer and you may see voltage
|>| sag.
|
|>Would a computer overload it?
|
| What do you mean by "computer"? A PC or a big-assed old mainframe?
| I seriously doubt a PC with a 400W power supply will overload a high leg
| transformer of a few kVA.

PC. I didn't think so.

The old mainframe might want three phase (to run its 400 Hz motor-gen set).

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-1643@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

daestrom

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

"Don Kelly" <dhky@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:tOOsj.43636$FA.30443@pd7urf2no...
> ----------------------------
<snip>
>
> The "6 phase " scheme wouldn't cost any more in terms of the transformers
> and could be done using a bank of 3 single phase pole pigs. However, it
> would appear that there would be additional costs involved with no net
> gain as well as a more complex system. Where possible one should avoid
> adding complexity (KISS). This doesn't mean that it can't be done but may
> mean that it shouldn't be done.
> There has been some playing around in the past on the basis that 3 phase
> is good so maybe 6 or 12 phase is better- tain't so except in some special
> cases.
> Where 6 phase has been used is in some urban distribution where there is a
> savings in terms of space necessary at a given line to neutral voltage
> because the line to line voltage between adjacent phases is then the same
> as to neutral. Whether this is still being done is something that I don't
> know. It also has been used for rectifier supplies in order to reduce
> harmonics and ripple.
>
> Your scheme of 480Y and single phase transformers is far better.

I did see, many years ago, something close to this. We called it a
'phase-shifting' transformer. IIRC, three of the outputs went to a
delta-delta isolation bank and the other three went to a second delta-delta.
Each delta-delta isolation bank fed a three-phase rectifier and the two
rectifier outputs were combined. Used it to provide a lot of rectified DC.

The phase-shifting transformer's two outputs where shifted 15 degrees and
with the isolation transformers greatly reduced the odd harmonics (third,
fifth, and seventh) which was a big issue since it was a shipboard
installation and the supply was far from 'infinite bus'.

Don't remember exact connections anymore though, that particular 'BeeBee'
has fallen out and been replaced by other trivia :-)

daestrom

krw

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

In article <47b3e384.5012812@news.verizon.net>, invalid@notreal.none
says...
>
>
> Are we not forgetting about the primary windings for such a scheme?

....and how does this "six phase" differ from a center-tapped three-
phase?

> For three phase, the textbooks say that wye-wye is not used because
> of undesirable harmonics in the neutral. Would that not apple also to
> this six phase scheme?
>
> How would the primaries be connected then?

Three phase delta?

> Also, doesn't six phase distribution mean six phase transmission? Six
> phase transmission for any distance is going to be horrorendously
> expensive just to keep a few apartment buildings at 120/240 V.

No need for six-phase transmission to get six phases at the
"apartment building". Like you, I don't see the point though.

Dunno, I'm not a power jock...

--
Keith

Michael Moroney

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net writes:

>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@theworld.com> wrote:

>|>| I have seen open delta 3 phase in residential areas of Baton Rouge LA for
>|>| whole house A/C. 1 large and one tiny transformer.
>|
>|>I'm sure when A/C systems started showing up, with many using 3-phase, they
>|>were among the first to get them down in the very hot south.
>|
>|>I wonder how many of those big+little transformer setups were Scott-T instead.
>|
>| I was real curious what was going on in the Baton Rouge case so I did
>| study the wiring enough to figure out it was open delta. I don't think
>| I've ever seen a Scott-T type setup using two pole pigs.

>What you would see in a Scott-T is that one transformer, preferrably the
>big one, would have 2 bushings, and the other would have 1 bushing. Each
>of the bushings would be connected to separate MV phases to get the 90
>degree phase relationship.

If I remember correctly, both transformers had 1 MV bushing, connected to
different phases, and the secondary was wired as open delta.

There are maybe two places near here where there are 2 transformers of
equal (physical) size that I think are wired as open delta. I'll take
a closer look, just in case.

>| I take that back, sort of.
>|
>| One weird setup I've seen, and I'm not totally sure exactly what it is:
>| 1 large 3 phase transformer (single can) with a small transformer can
>| below it on a pole. The small transformer has NO MV connection nor even a
>| MV bushing! It sits below the drops to the homes/businesses. The only
>| thing I can think it could be is the big can is 240V delta, and the high
>| leg powers the small can, with is a 208V/240VCT. The big can powers half
>| the residential services plus any 3 phase services, the small can powers
>| the other residential services. It's sort of Scott-T relative to the big
>| can. But this is a guess, I actually don't know how it's wired. I even
>| took a photo to try and figure it out. There are quite a few of these
>| setups in Philadelphia.

>If the big can is already 3 phase, why would anyone need to also have a
>Scott-T? That doesn't make sense. It must be something else. How many
>MV bushings on each can?

3 on the big can, 0 (yes, zero) on the small can.

I called it Scott-T like because I'm guessing the small can is fed from
the 240 delta high leg to neutral, which would be 90 degrees shifted from
the 240VCT winding. Assuming my guess at what it is is correct at all.

> How many secondary lugs?

4 on the big can, I believe 4 on the small can.

> While I have seen a
>few single-can three phase transformers in pole pig in pictures from other
>countries, I've never seen them in the USA.

There are a fair number around here (central Mass.), maybe 5-10% of all
pole installations. Want photos? :-)

>See if you can get multiple photos each at the same distance taken in a
>partial circle around the transformer setup so it can be seen in 3-D by
>pairing selected photos. Take them on a dismal cloudy gray overcast
>day. If you have exposure setting, take a second set overexposed by 2
>stops (to get more detail in the wiring itself). If using film, Tech Pan
>is the best choice unless something in color provides clues.

Any photography will have to wait several months before I go to the Philly
area again. I have a single photo of one setup which doesn't help
figuring out what's going on since the LV wiring is all bundled up.

Michael Moroney

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

"Ben Miller" <Ben@somewhere> writes:

>Michael Moroney wrote:
[color=darkred]
>You are not likely to see too many Scott T transformers with three-phase
>supplies feeding three-phase loads, as you simply don't need them. It is far
>more likely that the Large+small transformers are open delta.

I've heard that many single unit 3 phase transformers are internally wired
as Scott-T, since this requires only two cores and two sets of windings
instead 3 cores/3 sets of windings. Both the primary and secondary are
wired in the configuration of the 3 phase side of a true Scott-T
configuration.

Stuart

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

In article <13r9h2o39c8qn8d@corp.supernews.com>,
VWWall <vwall@large.invalid> wrote:

> Yep. That's one of the very few. I worked as a "broadcast engineer"
> whilst going to college. I still have my Radio Telephone First Class
> license.

I spent 20 years working in HF broadcast for the BBC external services,
then 7 years "domestic" - LF, MF, VHF and UHF TV then the last 10 years
repairing Microwave link equipment. I retired April 2007.

> Since you know about high power valves, do you remember the Rocky Point
> effect?

Can't say I've heard of that one, however, checking a definition via
google I think we would just have referred to "an internal flash-over" -
not something that happened very often. Seemed more common in Vac
capacitors which, without the protective circuits that valves usually had
could sustain an internal arc for several seconds.

Take a look here:

http://www.bbceng.info/Operations/t...oofferton_2.htm

I was never at Wofferton, spending all my HF career at Daventry but we had
the Marconi BD272s shown here in the first four pictures. The BY1144s were
used as final and modulator valves and had the two-phase filament we were
talking about. They were vapour (steam) cooled using the "steam down"
arrangement. By the look of the pictures Wofferton didn't take as much
care of their transmitters as we did!

(Note the safety "earthing wand" in some of the pictures)

When he speaks of needing 15mins for a wavechange however he is somewhat
exaggerating - two people working as a team would take around 5mins to
change all the coils and put all the settings on prior to powering and
tuning. (Welding gautlets were used to handle the hot coil members)

The last picture, of Sender 83, was like the new transmitters installed at
Daventry before I left. The Wofferton ones had a sort of pre-set tuning
arrangement and operated by remote command from a computer system that ran
the schedule. The Daventry ones (300kW) were a little later and fully
auto-tuning over the entire band.

The frequency synthesizer providing the drive was commanded via its HPIB
bus from the station computer control system. The Tx had what amounted to
a frequency counter at it's input, which derived the address for some
EPROMS, which stored coarse tune settings. Pneumatically operated switches
operated to tap the tuning coils and stepper motors wound Vac caps to the
correct place (HT was suppressed during this operation). Phase
discriminators provided fine tune information once low HT had been applied.

They had very fast acting protection for the valves (tubes) to prevent
internal damage.

It was tested by hanging about 5 feet of 5A fusewire from the HT (11kV)
supply to a vacuum contactor. The contactor was closed putting a dead
short across it and the protection was fast enough to prevent the fusewire
from blowing. It was quite spectacular when it didn't :-)

--
Stuart Winsor

From is valid but subject to change without notice if it gets spammed.

For Barn dances and folk evenings in the Coventry and Warwickshire area
See: http://www.barndance.org.uk

VWWall

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> VWWall wrote:

I first got it and my Telegraph Second in 1946, when I was discharged
from the Army Signal Corps.[color=darkred]
>
> Sure you do. There have been no new, or renewals of the 'First Class
> Radio Telephone License' for over 20 years. It was replaced with the
> 'General Radio Telephone License'. It was long gone when I went back to
> broadcast engineering in '87.

I forgot to say that is has the words "CANCELED" stamped on the last
renewal certificate, (P1-11-49835 Sep 23, 1976), which was a handsome
looking document. As you say it was replaced by the General license,
the only evidence for which is a little pocket card.

My last renewal of my Second Class Radiotelegraph License was Oct 15,
1981. After that they started charging for renewals.

Did you get your FCC Registration Number, which you now need do business
with the FCC? It gives you a password which must be used on their site.

--
Virg Wall, P.E., K6EVE

Stuart

2008-02-14, 8:25 pm

In article <4f714059b6SW_NOSPAM@dsl.pipex.com>,
Stuart <SW_NOSPAM@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> I was never at Wofferton, spending all my HF career at Daventry but we
> had the Marconi BD272s shown here in the first four pictures.

As an aside, I should have mentioned that the BD272s used two transformers
to give a six phase supply (since that seems to be the topic under
discussion) to two banks of six AR64 Mercury arc rectifiers.

--
Stuart Winsor

From is valid but subject to change without notice if it gets spammed.

For Barn dances and folk evenings in the Coventry and Warwickshire area
See: http://www.barndance.org.uk

Beachcomber

2008-02-14, 9:25 pm

>Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>

So that must mean that you know how to "Dip the plate and peak the
grid"...

The way it was...

I remember those days well. It was around 19 74 or 75 when I went
down to the Chicago Federal Building FCC offices. There was a big
classroom where they gave the tests. The tests were all multiple
choice and had a lot of trick questions.

If you were really a hot operator, you could also take the test for
Element 9 which was the "Radar Endorsement". That meant that you were
better than the guy who had a mere First Class Radio-Telephone License
without it. A lot of military and maritime guys would take the First
Class Radio-Telegraph License Test which was really cool, as well.

In later years, the FCC test stimulated the startup of a lot of
instant hack schools where they gave you the answers to actual FCC
tests. Anybody who could memorize the answers would get a "ticket".

Back then, even the disk jockeys needed at least a Third Class Radio
Telephone License if they were going to operate a low-to mid-power
radio station's transmitter.

Operation of a transmitter at a higher power station required the
First Class License.

If you got your license from going to such a school, you were often
considered a lowly "nine-week" wonder or whatever the length of the
school was by the people who had done it on their own.

There was a lot of pressure during those times to bring more women and
minorities into broadcasting and the broadcast station owners, among
others, lobbied to do away with the tests.

Before this, the government was limiting the supply of qualified
broadcast employees by requiring high standards and testing before
granting you your "ticket". From an employee standpoint, this was
good because the low supply kept wages high.

Beachcomber

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-15, 3:25 am

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:05:59 -0500 krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
| In article <47b3e384.5012812@news.verizon.net>, invalid@notreal.none
| says...
|>
|> >> B C
|> >> \ /
|> >> \ /
|> >>A----N----D
|> >> / \
|> >> / \
|> >> F E
|> >
|> >>A-N and N-D are both wound on the first core. B-N and N-E are both wound
|> >>on the second core. C-N and N-F are both wound on the third core. A third
|> >>of the 120/240 loads would be served from A-N-D. A third of the 120/240
|> >>loads would be served from B-N-E. A third of the 120/240 loads would be
|> >>served from C-N-F. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from A,C,E
|> >>and N. Half of the 208Y/120 loads would be served from B,D,F and N.
|> >
|> >I always wondered if either any electric company offered such a service,
|> >or if there was any such thing as a breaker panel that would support it.
|>
|> Are we not forgetting about the primary windings for such a scheme?
|
| ...and how does this "six phase" differ from a center-tapped three-
| phase?

When most or all of the loads are single phase, the "6 star" can keep the
loading balanced over the 3 incoming phases, while also providing genuine
240 volts to those single phase loads. 240DCT or 240DVCT puts most of
the loading on one phase angle (which might be 2 incoming phase lines).
208Y/120 balances the loads, but there's no 240. 240Y/139 is a bit rich
on the L-N circuits. 220Y/127 is sometimes a compromise.

|> Also, doesn't six phase distribution mean six phase transmission? Six
|> phase transmission for any distance is going to be horrorendously
|> expensive just to keep a few apartment buildings at 120/240 V.
|
| No need for six-phase transmission to get six phases at the
| "apartment building". Like you, I don't see the point though.

Which would you be willing to give up? Having 240 volts (and instead you
settle for a wimpy 208 volts) or having the phases balanced (this is more
of a utility concern)?

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-2135@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net

2008-02-15, 3:25 am

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:

|>If the big can is already 3 phase, why would anyone need to also have a
|>Scott-T? That doesn't make sense. It must be something else. How many
|>MV bushings on each can?
|
| 3 on the big can, 0 (yes, zero) on the small can.
|
| I called it Scott-T like because I'm guessing the small can is fed from
| the 240 delta high leg to neutral, which would be 90 degrees shifted from
| the 240VCT winding. Assuming my guess at what it is is correct at all.
|
|> How many secondary lugs?
|
| 4 on the big can, I believe 4 on the small can.

So the small can had 4 lugs and no MV bushings? Sounds like it might be
wired in as some kind of autotransformer. Maybe it is correcting the
voltage on the high leg or something.

--
|---------------------------------------/----------------------------------|
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (ka9wgn.ham.org) / Do not send to the address below |
| first name lower case at ipal.net / spamtrap-2008-02-14-2144@ipal.net |
|------------------------------------/-------------------------------------|