| Author |
Penalty for violation of FCC part 15 class B?
|
|
| midicad2001@yahoo.com 2006-02-06, 2:21 am |
| I am trying to convince my boss of the need for this.
I checked fcc web site but need a quick summary of what needs to be
done OR ELSE. Or else what?
I understand self-certification and Declaration of Conformity along
with details of radiated, conducted tests. I just need to put it into
language a business guy will understand.
Thanks!
DLR
| |
| Michael 2006-02-06, 6:21 pm |
| midicad2001@yahoo.com wrote in news:1139204135.819480.300840
@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
[snip]
> I understand self-certification and Declaration of Conformity along
> with details of radiated, conducted tests. I just need to put it into
> language a business guy will understand.
I think that this:
http://www.pseinc.com/faq.htm
will be good reading for a start.
The FCC issues statistics on non-compliancies and fines etc. (sorry, too
lazy to find that URL).
The most important phrase from a business point of view is that the
production can be halted (this is also valid for safety). The fines are
ground noise compared to the costs of a production stop when it comes to
larger volumes. If your customer is a company - be prepared for another
lawsuit.
HTH
Michael
| |
| hrhofmann@att.net 2006-02-07, 1:21 am |
| The FCC has levied fines starting at $10,000 USD for manufacturers who
violate the Parts 2 and 15 rules.
Suggest the number to your boss.
H. R. (Bob) Hofmann
| |
| John Hill 2006-02-19, 12:21 pm |
| Hello DLR,
What is the device that you are concerned about? Is it an intentional
radiator like a wireless device or something that has a microprocessor
in it?
John
| |
| harold@hallikainen.com 2006-02-22, 9:21 pm |
| A company was just fined $1,000,000 for importing unintentional
radiators without appropriate FCC testing. For the actual part 15
rules, see http://www.hallikainen.com
Harold
|
|
|
|